I feel that I have a very short, robust and simple to understand proof of GC. The only reason that I have not released it, is that I have many differing and...
16324
ratwain
Mar 30, 2005 2:39 pm
I think I can get to 10 different triplets that sum to 5449. The widest fanout in the process was 1301 ways to represent 1307. I can provide C source, the 10...
16325
jbrennen
Mar 30, 2005 2:57 pm
... It seems that we used different rules. Your rules seem to permit "back-tracking" of one or two of the primes, while my rules do not. Two different...
16326
Robin Garcia
sopadeajo2001
Mar 30, 2005 6:08 pm
I am an amateur and so cannot advice you. I sometimes think that Fermat (who was a true amateur) might have truly discovered a simple and marvelous proof of...
16327
€ ¢Ð’ºÐ°Ð»Ð°Ð±Ð¸Ð½ € ...
culturevolut...
Mar 30, 2005 7:01 pm
Hi to all. I'm new to this newsgroup and first of all I'm interested whether there's any program implementation of AKS algorithm open for public access. If...
16328
chrisdarroch
Mar 30, 2005 7:56 pm
Thankyou for your consideration, Robin. Thankyou for mentioning the unmentionable (money). I would have my proof ready and released within a week, if I thought...
16329
Décio Luiz Gazzoni...
deciogazzoni
Mar 30, 2005 8:34 pm
I hereby request that Chris Darroch be moderated. He lost track of mathematics and began talking about bets and money and so on again. As I believe the latter...
16330
Mark Underwood
marku606
Mar 30, 2005 9:13 pm
Hi Dick As you can tell I hurried - in fact I looked only at the first five rows of the first column, and then only the first row of the second column! How's...
16331
Gary Shannon
fiziwig
Mar 30, 2005 9:17 pm
Here's a different method of factoring I've been playing with. There's nothing really inovative in this, it's just a slightly different approach to a ...
16332
Décio Luiz Gazzoni...
deciogazzoni
Mar 30, 2005 9:35 pm
Sorry for top-replying, but here goes my analysis. What you're doing is basically a pseudorandom cycle method of sorts (a la Pollard rho), except that you try...
16333
Mark Underwood
marku606
Mar 31, 2005 7:08 am
Hi Chris Here's my advice. Assemble your papers and type your proof out into a file. Having it condensed all in one place in nice clean type can do wonders for...
16334
chrisdarroch
Mar 31, 2005 10:49 am
Thankyou for your kind post Mark, May I take this opportunity to offer my apologies, to any who have suffered under my posting strategy. I expect that I will...
16335
Dick
richard042
Mar 31, 2005 11:06 am
Hello, Take any number and square it and you are guaranteed a number that is "the best" regardless of it's factorization. -Dick ... bar ... attitude. ... ...
16336
Dick
richard042
Mar 31, 2005 11:40 am
... Sorry to say I am running short of spare time in the next couple of days, but I sense you are closer. In fact, I am looking forward to checking because if...
16337
Suresh Batta
subasoft
Mar 31, 2005 12:40 pm
Hi, I would like to find a page on the Internet that lists all the known algebraic prime number generators (non infinite ofcourse). Can somebody point to some...
16338
Adam
a_math_guy
Mar 31, 2005 2:31 pm
"Increasing their accurcacy" is not something a mathematician is going to be too generous about. You either have a proof of something and it is correct, or,...
16339
jbrennen
Mar 31, 2005 3:07 pm
... Yes, they potentially could claim the proof as their own if they publish it first. That is why if you actually do have a proof, it is imperative that you...
16340
Mark Underwood
marku606
Mar 31, 2005 3:37 pm
Yes, different rules. I like Ratwain's idea of using adjacent primes, whether increasing or decreasing. It extends the path and makes it more interesting, yet...
16341
chrisdarroch
Mar 31, 2005 4:57 pm
Your post allays the main themes of my worries. I believe that face to face, it is easier to attribute correctly, trust or not, in a person. Posting in this...
16342
chrisdarroch
Mar 31, 2005 5:12 pm
The rule, where there must be at most four 1's in any 2p period; it must be assumed that for the row header 3,the pattern of 1's and 2's will ensure that an...
16343
chrisdarroch
Mar 31, 2005 5:12 pm
The rule, where there must be at most four 1's in any 2p period; it must be assumed that for the row header 3,the pattern of 1's and 2's will ensure that an...
16344
jbrennen
Mar 31, 2005 5:21 pm
... Let me restate what I think you are trying to say... Assume a finite set of distinct odd primes, and for each prime p_i, an infinite periodic sequence of...
16345
Mark Underwood
marku606
Mar 31, 2005 6:06 pm
... Yes, I find some of my discoveries hard to believe as well! In one of my recent ones I found a relation such that the number of primes in an interval f(n)...
16346
Mark Underwood
marku606
Mar 31, 2005 6:12 pm
Correction: I had said: It is well known that given any two relatively prime a and b, there is always an r and s, r<a and s<b such that a*r - b*s = 1. ...
16347
chrisdarroch
Mar 31, 2005 8:40 pm
This is interesting. I put my effort on GC aside in the recent past in order to concentrate on something which had a definite prize for a result. It was the...
16348
Décio Luiz Gazzoni...
deciogazzoni
Mar 31, 2005 9:39 pm
... Hey Darroch, If you're really into integer factorization, I suggest you talk to my buddy James Harris over at the sci.crypt and sci.math newsgroups (if you...
16349
chrisdarroch
Mar 31, 2005 11:19 pm
Nice one....that made me laugh. You see, I seem to notice that if the pair of a product, are within a certain distance apart, then it is a simple matter to...
16350
Décio Luiz Gazzoni...
deciogazzoni
Mar 31, 2005 11:28 pm
... Yes, it's called Fermat's method. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FermatsFactorizationMethod.html ... Of course I did -- James is working in the state of the...
16351
Jud McCranie
judmccr
Apr 1, 2005 1:04 am
... And if you're in it for the money, as you said, then you should buy a lottery ticket instead - your chances of winning the lottery are much higher. ... ...
16352
Jose Ramón Brox
ambroxius
Apr 1, 2005 1:36 am
I think you are using Fermat's Factorization Method. n = a*b n = (d+s)(d-s) = d^2 - s^2 a = d+s b= d-s d= (a+b)/2 s= (a-b)/2 This method is invalid for numbers...
