protomuck : Message: Re: [protomuck] Speed up MUF execution

protomuck

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...

Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

Messages Help

Advanced

Speed up MUF execution

Message List

Reply | Forward

Message #826 of 839 |

Re: [protomuck] Speed up MUF execution

Ain't my program :-P These ones are found in the standard DB. but only 100 instructions per program default? I'd think my machine is fast enough to multiplex well enough with at least 2000. Probably more.

Thanks!

On Feb 9, 2009, at 11:04 AM, <hinoserm@...> wrote:

You may want to raise your instr_slice @tune, although at the point where
the default is introducing delays you may want to rethink the program design
first.

-Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Piacenti" <kelketek@gmail.com>
To: <protomuck@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 10:18 AM
Subject: [protomuck] Speed up MUF execution

Is there any way to speed up the execution of MUF programs? I'm using
a say replacement program and it's inducing a three second lag.
There's more than enough processing power on the machine to ensure
instantaneous execution, so what's the deal?

Mon Feb 9, 2009 5:11 pm

Show Message Option

Kelketek Rritaa <kelketek@...>

kindleflamem

Offline

Send Email

Forward

Message #826 of 839 |

Expand Messages	Author	Sort by Date
Is there any way to speed up the execution of MUF programs? I'm using a say replacement program and it's inducing a three second lag. There's more than enough...	Jonathan Piacenti kindleflamem	Feb 9, 2009 4:18 pm
You may want to raise your instr_slice @tune, although at the point where the default is introducing delays you may want to rethink the program design first. ...	hinoserm@... hinoserm	Feb 9, 2009 5:04 pm
Ain't my program :-P These ones are found in the standard DB. but only 100 instructions per program default? I'd think my machine is fast enough to multiplex...	Kelketek Rritaa kindleflamem	Feb 9, 2009 5:11 pm
Hm, I think the default is usually 10,000 .... I believe mine are set to 84,000. Try different values, you should be able to figure out where the best spot...	hinoserm@... hinoserm	Feb 9, 2009 5:22 pm
Wow, then 100 really is low! Guess I'll crank that sucker up. ... From: <hinoserm@...> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:21:56 To: <protomuck@yahoogroups.com>...	Kelketek Rritaa kindleflamem	Feb 9, 2009 5:26 pm
... <mailto:kelketek%40gmail.com>>...	Alynna Trypnotk alynnafoxie	Feb 13, 2009 6:08 pm
8192? That's an awfully precise number. ... From: Alynna Trypnotk <alynna@...> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:07:43 To: <protomuck@yahoogroups.com> ...	Kelketek Rritaa kindleflamem	Feb 13, 2009 10:03 pm
8192 is very precise, precisely 2^13...	David Horne dijit27	Feb 13, 2009 11:08 pm

< Prev Topic | Next Topic >

Advanced

Yahoo! My Yahoo! Mail
	Sign In New User? Sign Up
		Tech - Groups - Help

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...

Best of Y! Groups

Messages