Brian:
Now all you hae to do is the research, write a Doctoral Thesis and
find a university to grant you a PhD.
stanhbaker

--- In pulserpump@yahoogroups.com, "Brian White" <gaiatechnician@...>
wrote:
>
> This is just an overview. And it is also perhaps part of the reason
> scientists dont seem interested in researching the pump.
> The physics is incredibly complicated!
> Just the act of forming a bubble as the water goes down the tube!
> Big bubbles might require less energy to form than little ones? But
> little bubbles do not float upwards at the same rate, do they?
> So maybe it is better to break up the bubbles more. And what happens
> if 2 bubbles meet in the downpipe? Do they merge? do they break up
> more in the turbelence between them? (And this matters because you
> can send lots of air down to 7 feet deep or less air down to 10 feet
> from the same head. (I have found 10 ft deep better).
> Then there is the airlift section. You can use big pipes, you can use
> little pipes (Within a certain range) and the airlift process will
> carry on regardless. BUT it will not have the same efficiency.
> And it might be that to pump to different heights, you might need
> different size pipes for optimum results to those different heights.
> What i am trying to say is that the physics is too complicated and
> that experimental results trump theory is such instances.
> The way to build a better pulser pump starts with building a pulser
> pump.