This is a group of active inquirers into the boundaries of existing quantum mechanics theory seeking to resolve its deep mysteries.
Members respect the premiere
and established status of the theory
and those who uncovered and built it, but also intuitively suspect it is not the final word and perhaps
we are on the cusp of a "paradigm shift"
into a new theory.
Special emphasis is on cooperatively exploring
and developing local hidden
variable theories that are
consistent with known
quantum mechanics,
both theoretical and experimental.
Members are committed to the
highest standards of
mathematical and scientific rigor,
but also seek the most elegant
simplifications.
Members regularly
read scientific papers and books on the subject, and have high
respect for each
other and especially
the scientists currently
working in the field.
... ... Vznuri-- Hi. You posted a similar article about a week ago, I believe. It got me to hunt down the article by Klammer and Steinacker. It's somewhat
thought this an interesting article Getting a theory of everything by ditching tenet of physics A few recently published papers indicate that the long-running
hi all, this has an excellent update on a key question Ive wondered about, out loud in this blog I believe. did einstein know about the michelson morely
hi all, this qm cpu thing is going way slower than I thought, but heres some tangible progress. they use a lot of atoms that cohere.. dont know if this could
How ,,induction'' lamp works and absurdities of quantum hypothesis The induction lamp mechanism contradicts both classical electromagnetism and quantum theory.