Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
rael-science-select · get the news of tomorrow's science today
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Parents banned from taking pictures of their own children at sports   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #17729 of 18946 |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Source:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/5560978/Parents-banned-from-t\
aking-pictures-of-their-own-children-at-sports-day.html


Parents banned from taking pictures of their own children at sports day

Published: 6:41PM BST 17 Jun 2009
Parents cheer children on at school sports day: Parents banned from taking
pictures of their own children at sports day

Mrs Ethelston's Church of England Primary School, in Uplyme, Devon, prohibited
photos and video filming, claiming it was due to changes in child protection and
images legislation.

It is the first time the school has taken such measures.

Parents criticised the move and said they felt there was no legal reason why
they cannot take photos for personal use.

Jane Souter, who has a son at the school and is chair of the Parents Teachers
and Friends Association, said: "It is a shame but that is the way it is all
going now, you are not allowed to do a lot of things because of rules and
regulations.

"A lot of the parents think it is a great shame. There are people who have been
there for many, many years and they are upset about it, although they do not
blame the school.

"It is sad that you are not allowed to take pictures of your own children.

"It is all to do with the pictures getting into the wrong hands and the school
has to follow its own code of conduct. "I am sure the school do not like it just
as much as we do."

Another parent, who did not want to be named, said: "Parents want to record
achievements through their child's life and not to be made to feel that they are
all criminals and are going to upload dodgy photos to some porn site."

They added that many parents were upset that they could no longer take photos
and fear photography will be banned at every school event.

They said: "Speaking to many parents, they were extremely annoyed and
exasperated and no one really knew why they couldn't take photos of their
children as they done so in the past.

"Many seemed just resigned that it was a sign of the times."

They added: "Please, please, clear this ridiculous nanny state affair up."

A spokesman for the Devon local education authority said: "It's a decision which
individual head teachers come to, usually with consultation with governors."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its full
capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not mean that I
agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL" means that I believe
it is important for the people of this planet to know about what people think or
do, even when what they think or do is completely stupid and against our
philosophy. When I selected articles in the past about stupid Christian
fundamentalists in America praying for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader
was stupid enough to believe that I was supporting praying to change the
weather. So, when I select articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-semitic,
anti-Jewish, racist, revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group or
religion, or any other stupid article, it does not mean that I support them. It
just means that it is important for all human beings to know about them. Common
sense, which is usually very good among our readers, is good enough to
understand that. When, like in the recent articles on drug decriminalization, it
is necessary to make it clearer, I add a comment, which in this case was very
clear: I support decriminalizing all drugs, as it is stupid to throw depressed
and sad people (as only depressed and sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin
their life with a criminal record. That does not mean that there is any change
to the Message which says clearly that we must not use any drug except for
medical purposes. The same applies to the freedom of expression which must be
absolute. That does not mean again of course that I agree with anti-Jews,
antisemites, racists of any kind or anti-Raelians. But by knowing your enemies
or the enemies of your values, you are better equipped to fight them. With love
and respect of course, and with the wonderful sentence of the French philosopher
Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death
your right to say it".






Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:01 pm

kosmozz
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #17729 of 18946 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The Raelian Movement for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org ...
selected by Rael
kosmozz
Offline Send Email
Jun 23, 2009
8:04 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help