Hi! I want to lokalize my Rainbowportal 2006 to hungarian language. I have created in Resources folder file Rainbow.hu.resx and build project with VS2003. Now...
kubrna
kuba55@...
May 31, 2006 10:59 am
2515
In the next few days, I will release a preview build with our most talked about feature : ASPNETDB. I encourage everyone to download it and crush it in...
I posted a photo of a migration plan for most 1.1 sites. As long as you have not coupled a custom core to your site, you can safely migrate your site to 2.0....
I have released a migration Port of the 1.1 code. You may read about it here http://url123.com/yx5wd and direct questions to ramseur[at]gmail[dot]com....
RE: RainbowPortal on 1.1 framework Anyone built a superior user/role management module(s)? Anyone built a mechanism for capturing more data about a user during...
I can't really comment on this, except to say that the EasyListBox license was originally gifted to the Rainbow project for the purpose of "kicking up" the...
Ed: Images included ... hopefully, your mail service doesn't block them, if so then so won't see what I'm talking about. Here is a sample of users control I...
Thanks Bill, that's exaxtly the type of thing I'm after - can you send me the code when you have a spare moment please. Also, would you be happy to have this...
Hi, I am trying to install the version . I got the below error message. Please help me solve this issue. Server Error in '/R2A3' Application. Configuration...
Possubly, your Virtual directory runs under ASP.Net 1.1 instead of 2.0 Also, please use the following links to ask the questions: ...
Alexey 0 Moudrick
moudrick@...
Jun 23, 2006 12:31 pm
2524
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35157 I wonder if anyone else has noticed this behaviour with their RainbowPortal sites? Try...
If you are concerned about the spiders consider creating a "robots.txt". Spiders will read this file, if it exists, to determine what paths, if any, it can ...
Thanks Bill (& Eric), any other suggestions as Eric rightly points out robots.txt is already there and all spiders are allowed by default, where they spider is...
Hmm Maybe a solution would be to use the SQLMAPprovider in 2.0 and link that with a google site account. This way you can publish your site in xml to google...
About validation. In the rainbow 2.0 build, all the ASPX has been conformed to XHTML reqs. I did this back in the Alpha 2-3 builds. ... -- Eric Ramseur ...
relying on robots isnt so great anyway in my opionoin, long ago, google opened an api, and you can make google site maps, it was already in rhe rainbow plans,...
The portal should still be spiderable. Google sitemaps is a bonus as they make it easy, but there are search engines other than google that are still...
... On 6/30/06, Edward Daniel < yahoo@... > wrote: Thanks Bill (& Eric), any other suggestions as Eric rightly points out robots.txt is already there...
what happes to rainbow if in default.aspx if we use server.transfer instead of redirect? has anyone ever tried that? would that fix the w3c validator problem? ...
does the issue occur with all spriders, or only google...since they modifed their spider early last eyar, and it seems a lot of people ( not only asp.net )...
the only url that works "http://www.jonavi.com/desktopdefaul.aspx?pageid=218" in this case there is no redirect, and is the only "way" to accomplish this. ...
actually strange, even though on check header, http://www.jonavi.com/desktopdefault.aspx?pageid=218 worked before, now it returns 302. ... actually strange,...
Unfortunately this appears to be a common thing now amongst search engines to avoid mis-use such as page spamming - so if you put up a 302 it leaves. ... ...
Just been browsing this link: http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/ASPNET_Best_Practices.asp and read this: 6. Use Server.Transfer: Use the Server.Transfer...
Did a quick check - setting endResponse to false still gave a 302 redirect code. Server.Transfer seems the way to go - any thoughts on impact this will have...
The problem as I understood it was that the spiders were not following Response.Redirect redirections. Because server.transfer does not change the URL, this is...
default uses server.transfer last i checked... doesnt matter anyway, the problem happens even on desktopdefault when there is no redirect. its possible global...