Users of Rainbow Portal, I want to start a dialogue about Rainbow Portal and see what you guys have been missing as far as features are concerned, what you...
Ive cleaned up the default 2.0 install with the issues that came out after we released. I opened rainbow up in VS 2008, targeted the 2.0 framework and ...
http://rainbow.googlecode.com/files/rainbow2.0.0.1881e.zip Hit to you guys first to try. Please install this on multiple boxes so I can get some feedback if...
Also if you want to open it in VS 2005 then use the solution file in VS.2005.Backup. -- Regards, Eric Ramseur Software Solution Architect www.razavi.com ...
Can someone with VS 2005 please report that they got a clean compile/install? I only have VS 2008 currently and just use the target feature. I can see VS...
Ok early users are reporting that they need the cs project files that got replaced by VS 2008. Ill add them to the backup directory and rezip. Thanks for...
I am agree with Miguel, he is right! But please avoid drastic changes in one commit. I don't mean additions or deletions. I mean restructuring (moving files...
Alexey 0 Moudrick
moudrick@...
Dec 6, 2007 7:32 am
2733
All this creating branches and merging stuff is too complicated and too slow. I would like to propose a more agile approach which fits open source dynamic...
Yannick Smits
yannick@...
Dec 6, 2007 11:47 am
2734
This way applicable for each separate component, but not for the whole project. RB 1.6 could be developed component by component. in RB 2.0 and later a can see...
Alexey 0 Moudrick
moudrick@...
Dec 6, 2007 12:05 pm
2735
I use VSS 2005 at work so Im used to a different way. Regardless we have svn and I like it. Im buying visualsvn and just going to only check in code that...
I am ready to continue with performing "source keeper" role. Using singular Subversion or better public open source repository. The current googlecode ...
Alexey 0 Moudrick
moudrick@...
Dec 6, 2007 2:17 pm
2737
So Ive located that the Resources are our prime reason for failed installs. I had to weed out not just the file but the prescense that was deeply rooted in the...
That is how we did it originally and one of the main reasons I walked away aside from just lack of organization was the sandbox insanity. It was a real pain to...
So, .NET is at v3.5 now. Why are we still targeting v2? Is it a mono issue? Personally, mono can go jump off a cliff. I want LINQ. What is the point of playing...
Totally understand. Sandboxes are good when you have a stable version to work with and constent development. I was trying to get us away from making mistakes...
First of all most users dont even have VS 2008 and can take advantage of 3.5. Since 3.5 is just an addon to 2.0 anyone can go to 2.0. This is my whole point....
Yeah, that should be one of the first things done, fixing the resource mess. We need a few other things. Naming conventions for API Clear separation of what...
I am a huge fan of OO programming. In fact I use generated ( codesmith) business objects for every project I do. This way its not only OO but standards...
Ok, that makes sense. The code needs to be split up anyway so that should work fine. From: rainbowportal@yahoogroups.com [mailto:rainbowportal@yahoogroups.com]...
Yeah we have really taken the Rainbow framework into a new direction with 2.1 . If you sample that you can see the raw work that went into it because rainbow...
Ok, cool. We can make 2 DAL layers then. One with LINQ and the other with the older dataset for the .NET v2 crowd. Then once the older one has all the core...
Now youre thinking. Also I personally believe MONO will own. It makes it easy for us to deploy rainbow on anything. Personally id also like to support an...
Alright Folks, I uploaded the new file and as as always again ask for you to check it out and yell at me if anything is wierd of an install breaks. It runs...
Ok, before you go off and make a linux project out of this, back up a minute. If you can't even get buy-in from the team to make a windows centric version how...
Oh Will. Just ideas man. Im strickly Microsoft for now as its 100 percent supported. We can make our project under mono when the time comes. -- Regards, ...
Mono is just a framework. Not that much has to change for it to be on MS or mono. Have you downloaded it? Its actually easier then MS. You can develop in...
Then you missed my first point. I already explained that I would not use mono until it was gold and that it was close to that but not to even concentrate on...
Vote for *MVC*! Vote for *Naming convention*! Not only in API interface, since we are open source, we have to follow a good public convention. And even more -...
Alexey 0 Moudrick
moudrick@...
Dec 6, 2007 8:58 pm
2755
All that is good but we need something right now. Lets get rainbow working like it used to just with ASPNETDB and the APIs in their own assemblies. Thats a...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
