Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
recursive-partitioning · Recursive Partitioning
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: [RP] Methodology development: Open vs. Proprietary   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #80 of 95 |
T.S. Lim said
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Since most (if not all) applications of Data Mining
are in commerce, the risk of using unproven methodology that hasn't
been extensively scrutinized may be acceptable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I once asked Gwilym Jenkins, of Box-Jenkins forecasting fame, why
he was willing to sell commercial forecasting software with trade
secrets embedded when everyone knew that scientific peer review
was the only way to ensure that we were doing good science.

He replied that acceptance and use in the commercial world was
an alternative community to scientific peers for setting a
standard of excellence.

My opinion is that he was right: if you are willing for your
company to make bad decisions, you too can help prove that
the unreviewed science behind software is invalid.

George S. Cowan




Tue Oct 17, 2000 4:29 pm

cowan@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #80 of 95 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

T.S. Lim said <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Since most (if not all) applications of Data Mining are in commerce, the risk of using...
Cowan, George
cowan@...
Send Email
Oct 24, 2000
11:23 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help