Hello Jim,
Sunday, September 23, 2001, 3:32:09 AM, you wrote:
JP> Scott,
>> >The general rule is "Don"t open unexpected attachments from *anyone*".
heloo all,
iwant to ask, how to configure proxy server on linux by squid
and i have domain intranet i wan to setting dns on my machine
any can help me, please, how about setting dns with bind from first,
from how compile bind and setting dns
--
Best regards,
cihay mailto:deri_voorfo@...
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
I have installed RH7.1 on my P4 machine, I got the NIC recongnized and can ssh
and ping external sites. Was able to get X configured using 640X480,
X16colors.
Running an ATI Rage 128, AGP 4X, 32 M video ram., have tried installing other x
servers and none of them work for me. Would like to get higher resolutions
X65K colors. Any suggestions what else to try, have tried various x servers,
Xconfigurator, and even tried commercial X drivers version 3.5.
Has anyone been able to get this video card to work with RH7.1? iF SO how?
Suggestions welcome.
Emilio
Scott,
Thank you for your help. I now use kernel-2.4.9
Jacques
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott [mailto:scottro@...]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 9:00 PM
To: redhat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [despammed] RE: [redhat] Kernel Time
On 20:20 2001/09/30 -0400, Jacques wrote
>Before I go try your method. When I follow the README everything is
>successful but when I boot from the following in LILO:
>
>image=/boot/bzImage
>label=newlinux
>read-only
>root=/dev/hdb6
>
>it hangs after:
>ok, booting kernel
ARGH---I forgot to mention that, frequent as it is.
Ok, wrong processor---
Ok, here's what we do.
cd /usr/src/linux
DON'T make mrproper
make menuconfig
Go down to processor, choose the one that you have--that's another thing
(don't know if it's only RH in this case) but i586, for example, is what it
will show, even if you have a K6-II processor.
I'm REALLY sorry about that, I simply forgot to mention it.
Once you've chosen the processor to match your system, then
make dep; make clean; make bzImage (all that as before.)
make modules; make modules_install
cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.9 (or whatever--I guess you
left its name as bzImage)
run lilo again, even though nothing's changed
/sbin/lilo
boot and it should work. Again, I apologize for not mentioning that
part. FWIW it's happened to me many times the default is PIII I think.
Also, double check your boot sector to be sure that bzImage is in there
(although if it wasn't, lilo probably would have given an error message.
Start posting to the redhat group using the following address:
redhat@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Hello Jacques,
=== Monday, October 01, 2001, you wrote:
J> I have downloaded kernel 2.4.9. This is what I did:
>snip<
J> I though I was done but it doesn't seem to be updated or at least it doesn't
J> recognize it because when I do 'uname -r' i still get 2.4.2. Is there
J> something i am missing or what am i doing wrong?
J> Thanks
J> Jacques
Well I'm a newbie at this too, isn't it fun ???
Using RH-7.1 this is the method I use, it's worked with my upgrades
from 2.4.2, bla-bla, 2.4.9 so far, in the next few days I'll go 2.4.10.
This should work for you too, if using RH pay special attention to
step 10.
These steps are modified by me, I originally saw them posted on the
website of a member of another linux-list (thanks to skylinux).
Hope it works for you too :)
1--------
login as 'root'
2--------
'cp linux-2.4.2.tar.gz /usr/src/'
3--------
'cd /usr/src/'
4--------
Check if your old Kernel source is in /usr/src/linux if so,
do 'mv /usr/src/linux linux-X.X.X' where X.X.X is your curent kernel version.
This will keep your old Kernel source it case you don't like your new kernel.
You can remove it later.
5--------
'tar -zxvf linux-2.4.2.tar.gz'
6--------
Now move your new Kernel source,
'mv /usr/src/linux /usr/src/linux-2.4.2'
and create a link to it
'ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.4.2 /usr/src/linux'
7--------
Check the file 'linux/Documentaion/Changes' for the latest requirements.
8--------
Run 'make mrproper' in /usr/src/linux/
9--------
You are ready to configure your Kernel, you have 4 choices:
'make config' Config with bash, config asks you the config questions
'make menuconfig' Text based color menus, radiolists & dialogs.
'make xconfig' X windows based configuration tool.
'make oldconfig' Default all questions based on the contents of your existing
./.config file.
I recommend using 'make menuconfig' or 'make xconfig'
10--------
When you are done configuring your kernel AND you saved the configuration,
you should check you '/usr/src/linux/Makefile' if the paths are correct.
You proberbly don't need to change anything - but you should take a look!
REDHAT USERES WATCH OUT!!!
RedHat puts it's Kernel and stuff into /boot so uncomment the line
'#export INSTALL_PATH=/boot'
(that means remove the #)
11--------
Run 'make dep'
12--------
Run 'make clean'
13--------
Run 'make bzImage'
14--------
In order to use ppp run
'mknod /dev/ppp c 108 0'
to create a device called ppp
15--------
If you build ppp support as modules,
you will need the following in your '/etc/modules.conf' file:
alias char-major-108 ppp_generic
alias /dev/ppp ppp_generic
alias tty-ldisc-3 ppp_async
alias tty-ldisc-14 ppp_synctty
alias ppp-compress-21 bsd_comp
alias ppp-compress-24 ppp_deflate
alias ppp-compress-26 ppp_deflate
16--------
Run 'make modules'
17--------
Install the modules 'make modules_install'
18--------
When it's done,
'cp /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-x.x.x'
19--------
edit 'vi /etc/lilo.conf' and add the new kernel image.
boot=/dev/hda
map=/boot/map
prompt
timeout=50
message=/boot/message
default=new
image=/boot/vmlinuz-x.x.x
label=new
read-only
root=/dev/hda5
image=/boot/vmlinuz-x.x.x
label=old
read-only
root=/dev/hda5
20--------
run 'lilo'
You're done!!!
I'm trying to set up a simple Firewall(via IPTABLES) here at work as
a side project but I'm having a little problem. The one computer
behind this firewall can't ping or be pinged, this computer currently
has Win2000 on it. Here is my setup:
10.0.0.60(External Network)
10.0.0.65(Internal Network)
10.0.0.66(Win2000 Client behind Internal Network)
255.0.0.0(Subnet Mask for the whole setup)
I was following the instructions at http://www.e-
infomax.com/ipmasq/howto/beta/m-html/ipmasq-HOWTO-m.html#AEN1406 I
followed them all the way up to Section 5.3 where it wanted the
internal MASQ client to ping the MASQ server which I spent all day
trying to do with no luck. At one time I did have a DHCP server
running off of the MASQ server and I could get DHCP addresses but I
could not get the MASQ client to ping the MASQ server(and vice versa)-
I have a static IP setup on it now. I even changed out a network card
(on the MASQ server) and re-imaged the Win2000 computer.
My company is migrating operations from a mainframe environment to a
UNIX platform. We currently receive data monthly in EBCDIC format on
tape cartridges that are read into the mainframe and then processed
by a SAS program. We now want to read these files directly from the
tape drive to the UNIX system (the goal to abandon any dependency on
the mainframe). However, these EBCDIC files unfortunately have
packed decimal data in them that becomes corrupt when converting the
EBCDIC to ASCII. What can I do to get a clean conversion of the
packed data into an ASCII format the SAS program on the UNIX platform
can process? There has to be a solution out there. I've been
looking everywhere with no luck. I can't believe I'm the first to
confront this issue. Any help would be most welcome. Thanks all.
regards,
Marc Grabowski
True... IIRC, the only workable winmodems are the ones using the Lucent
LT chipsets and then the fixes to make them work are kludgy.
Have you seen those horrid little winmodems that are the size of a
matchbook roughly and use that tiny little proprietary PCI slot on newer
motherboards? (the slot is about a 3rd the size of a standard PCI slot).
Ugh...What is the point of those things? Why dont they just make a phone
jack on your soundcard, and let you just do it that way? (since all that
winmodems amount to anyway are specialized soundcards).. heh heh
cheers
Jeff
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Tim Fairchild wrote:
> On Friday 28 September 2001 21:10, Jeff Lane wrote:
>
> > SO what NIC and Modem are you using? And what is the problem you are
> > having.
>
> IIRC it was a winmodem. The advice was to ditch it for a real modem. I don't
> think he liked the advice. In my area I ditch winmodems on Win boxes as well.
> They're pretty useless on rural lines.
>
> tim
you need to set up the correct forwarding...
for example lets say you use the 192.168.1 space on your internal lan, and
your IP for the DSL connection is 207.54.0.100
in that case, you would have to set your router up to route all incoming
port 80 packets to the internal address of your web server. Not knowing
anything about your particular setup, best I can say is that you need to
look into a router (or at least proper router configuration,
portforwarding, and NATing the internal addresses)
cheers
J
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Jacques wrote:
>
> I want to set up my linux box(rh7.1) as a server, host my site and set up
> ftp. I am using a hub to split the dsl between a dual boot(rh7.1, win me)
> and win me. I have gotten as far to get apache to work on my lan, i use the
> ip address from 'ifconfig' but can't access it through my dsl ip. With ftp
> I am just lost with that and need some help there. Could anybody give me
> newbie instructions on how I can do this?
man wvdial
less wvdial.conf
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, zingi wrote:
> I tried and failed to go online from the console mode of RH Linux 7.1. I
> tried the book Rh Linux 7.1 Unleashed and its commands but some commands
> don't work and it's too corny.
>
> Can anyone refer me to a single file (preferably in pdf/ ps/ doc/ ppt or
> txt) that gives elaborate description with examples of how to connect to
> the net thru' the text mode of RH Linux 7.1 distro.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Scott wrote:
> This is one that I wonder about--the thing is, crackers (the more proper
> name as hacker should really be anyone interested in playing with computers
> [he wrote pedantically]) aim their stuff at IIS. I think, that as Linux
> becomes more mainstream, they'll find the weaknesses in Apache as
> well. It's just that MS is such a tempting target. :) (I could be
> TOTALLY wrong about this too, of course.)
That is a good point to consider... but consider the other side of the
coin as well.
Given an IIS server and an Apache server, and equal market share, equal
exposure, and equal popularity, the Apache server will still probably win
out.
The reason, at least in my opinion is two-fold. First, IIS is made up of
a LOT of weird proprietary stuff that M$ would rather not let you know
about. (then again thats true of most all of their other products as
well). They say that IIS has more features than Apache. Sure.. Then
again, Apache would run Directx and other bad things too if they were
opend up.
Secondly, and this is a direct relation to the first thing, the nature of
proprietary v. open source. given the same two machines, say an exploit
is found for each of them, that is roughly the same. Say some sort of
buffer overflow or something that would equally affect both servers.
(Thats TWO strikingly similar exploits, not one exploit to use against
both machines)
IN order for the IIS admin to get his machine going, he would need the
following:
A: notice of the exploit. THis would come from a mail elert, BugTraq, or
somethign like that. (M$ really doesnt like their exploits mentioned at
all on BugTraq for some reason)
B: M$ to produce a patch to IIS to fix the exploit.
B2: M$ or some other outlet to notify him of the fix
C: download the patch and apply it.
D: test the machine for integrity
E: put machine back online
Now The same applies to the Apache admin as well. HOWEVER there is one
striking difference: In teh case of the apache server, a fix could be
available in a matter of minutes (theoretically) since the number of
apache maintainers worldwide, and people who arent necessarily maintainers
but are quite capable of patching a security hole outnumber the amount of
IIS maintainers.
Also, if Red Hat doesnt immediately release a patch, there are quite a few
other distros that ship Apache that would gladly take the lead and put out
a patch (this is NOT to say Red Hat == Linux, it is just used as an
example. Perhaps you could s/Red Hat/$DISTRO/g here)
And if all those fail, there are the apache maintainers and other hackers
over the world that could and would do it.
The point is, IMHO, that the time to get a fix for Apache vs. IIS is
faster for Apache.
Then again, I could also be wrong... but hey, who knows... in a perfect
world. <grin>
J
I downloaded freebirth....tar.gz
i did the following:
tar xzvf freebirth....tar.gz
cd freebirth...
make(as the install says to do)
then there is a executable freebirth which I do ./freebirth to execute but
after that it hangs
can anybody assist me please
thanks
Jacques
On 21:25 2001/10/02 -0400, Jacques wrote
>I downloaded freebirth....tar.gz
>i did the following:
>tar xzvf freebirth....tar.gz
>cd freebirth...
>make(as the install says to do)
>then there is a executable freebirth which I do ./freebirth to execute but
>after that it hangs
It doesn't say do make install?
Scott
no it only says to do 'make'
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott [mailto:scottro@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 PM
To: redhat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [despammed] [redhat] Freebirth
On 21:25 2001/10/02 -0400, Jacques wrote
>I downloaded freebirth....tar.gz
>i did the following:
>tar xzvf freebirth....tar.gz
>cd freebirth...
>make(as the install says to do)
>then there is a executable freebirth which I do ./freebirth to execute but
>after that it hangs
It doesn't say do make install?
Scott
Start posting to the redhat group using the following address:
redhat@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Hi,
I´ve a problem with sendmail and i´ll explain it by this example:
If i send an email to bob@... , the email goes very fast without
warnings.
If i send an email to bob@... the email stay in my outbox and the
server keep trying to resolve the name with no sucessfull.
I´m just having problem with hotmail!
So i just wanna the sendmail doesnt need to resolve the recipient email
before send it
thks!!
<>-------------------<>
Fernando Barros
<>-------------------<>
My company is migrating operations from a mainframe environment to a
UNIX platform. We currently receive data monthly in EBCDIC format on
tape cartridges that are read into the mainframe and then processed
by a SAS program. We now want to read these files directly from the
tape drive to the UNIX system (the goal to abandon any dependency on
the mainframe). However, these EBCDIC files unfortunately have
packed decimal data in them that becomes corrupt when converting the
EBCDIC to ASCII. What can I do to get a clean conversion of the
packed data into an ASCII format the SAS program on the UNIX platform
can process? There has to be a solution out there. I've been
looking everywhere with no luck. I can't believe I'm the first to
confront this issue. Any help would be most welcome. Thanks all.
regards,
Marc Grabowski
I would like to know if somebody knows any software that scan some
words(I´ll choose) and not delivered the message if found it
Thks!
<>-------------------<>
Fernando Barros
Depto Internet
<>-------------------<>
I've been working to get RedHat 7.1 working properly on a Micron laptop for
a while now. However, I've had a lot of difficulty setting up the Ethernet
card. After scanning the Ethernet howto and pcmcia howto, it looks like the
key is to be setting things up with linuxconf. Strangely enough, it doesn't
seem to be installed. I was trying to dig through the package list to see
if I could figure out where it is, but have not had any success. The
install I did was the typical graphical install choosing the "laptop" option
(no customization). My questions are:
1) Where is linuxconf in RH7.1? Has it been replaced by another
application?
2) Is there a master list of the files located in the packages that come
with the CD somewhere? I have yet to find it, and being able to search for
"linuxconf" within a list of package contents would be handy.
Any help would be appreciated.
Jeff
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 16:14:30 -0400, "Henze, Jeff" <jeff.henze@...>
wrote:
> 1) Where is linuxconf in RH7.1? Has it been replaced by another
> application?
No, it just isn't installed by default
> 2) Is there a master list of the files located in the packages that come
> with the CD somewhere? I have yet to find it, and being able to search for
> "linuxconf" within a list of package contents would be handy.
I do, however, advise against using Linuxconf. It tends to break more things
up than it fixes - in my experience anyway.
It is perfectly possible to do this without resorting to linuxconf. I have 3
netted boxes, 2 of them running RH7.1, and linuxconf is installed on
neither of them.
First of all what kind of network card are you using? Depending on what you
have, you might have to recompile your kernel. Once you've determined what
kind of NIC is is and ascertained whether you need to recompile or not, use
"setup" (as root) and go into the Network setup section. You'll be asked a
bunch of questions about your setup (dynamic or static IP#, subnet mask
etc...), just leave blank the field for the default gateway.
Once that's done, still as root:
# /etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart
And you should be up and running.
--
____________________________________________
| G. Stewart -- gstewart@... |
| Port de Pontille, FR-37500 CHINON, FRANCE. |
____________________________________________
J,
Could you please explain to me in detail how I can do this? Keep in mind I
have a HUB not a router.
Thanks
Jacques
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Lane [mailto:jlane@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:09 PM
To: redhat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [redhat] Newbie help
you need to set up the correct forwarding...
for example lets say you use the 192.168.1 space on your internal lan, and
your IP for the DSL connection is 207.54.0.100
in that case, you would have to set your router up to route all incoming
port 80 packets to the internal address of your web server. Not knowing
anything about your particular setup, best I can say is that you need to
look into a router (or at least proper router configuration,
portforwarding, and NATing the internal addresses)
cheers
J
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Jacques wrote:
>
> I want to set up my linux box(rh7.1) as a server, host my site and set up
> ftp. I am using a hub to split the dsl between a dual boot(rh7.1, win me)
> and win me. I have gotten as far to get apache to work on my lan, i use
the
> ip address from 'ifconfig' but can't access it through my dsl ip. With
ftp
> I am just lost with that and need some help there. Could anybody give me
> newbie instructions on how I can do this?
Start posting to the redhat group using the following address:
redhat@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
I recently did this myself (but with a cable modem).
The only way you'll be able to do this is with SEPARATE IP addresses for
each computer on your network (cost to service provider: maybe $6 extra
per month for *each* extra IP address). Remember, you're trying to do
this with a HUB. A hub does not translate IP addresses! (In fact, you
don't even need a hub if you only have 2 computers!)
Now, what you probably really want to do is get yourself a router. A
router is able to translate the IP addresses either side of the device.
i.e. you have the Internet on the outside (WAN), and your interior network
on the inside (your LAN).
Fork out the $120 for the RP114 Netgear router (up to 4 PCs), and you can
set it up (initially) in 1/2 hour. First thing: make ONE computer work
(your Service Provider's connection will see your PC's MAC address only).
Next, connect the router in between, and see that that is working.
Finally, add other PCs. Your first computer will be 192.168.0.2 (the
router is 192.168.0.1). What happens is a request coming from the next PC
(say, 192.168.0.3) will be passed through the router, and the router
translates it such that your DSL thinks it's the first computer still!!
Neat, huh? Worry about the other stuff later. What you'll be doing, is
setting up the router to accept an incoming request (on port 80, for a
browser), and passing all such requests to a specific PC (of your
choosing).
Charles Kirby
_____ . .
' \\ . . |>>
O// . . |
\_\ . Charles Kirby . |
| | . . . . |
/ | . . . . |
/ .| kirbych@... ...o |
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Jacques wrote:
> J,
>
> Could you please explain to me in detail how I can do this? Keep in mind I
> have a HUB not a router.
>
> Thanks
> Jacques
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Lane [mailto:jlane@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:09 PM
> To: redhat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [redhat] Newbie help
>
>
> you need to set up the correct forwarding...
>
> for example lets say you use the 192.168.1 space on your internal lan, and
> your IP for the DSL connection is 207.54.0.100
>
> in that case, you would have to set your router up to route all incoming
> port 80 packets to the internal address of your web server. Not knowing
> anything about your particular setup, best I can say is that you need to
> look into a router (or at least proper router configuration,
> portforwarding, and NATing the internal addresses)
>
> cheers
> J
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Jacques wrote:
>
> >
> > I want to set up my linux box(rh7.1) as a server, host my site and set up
> > ftp. I am using a hub to split the dsl between a dual boot(rh7.1, win me)
> > and win me. I have gotten as far to get apache to work on my lan, i use
> the
> > ip address from 'ifconfig' but can't access it through my dsl ip. With
> ftp
> > I am just lost with that and need some help there. Could anybody give me
> > newbie instructions on how I can do this?
>
>
>
> Start posting to the redhat group using the following address:
>
> redhat@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> Start posting to the redhat group using the following address:
>
> redhat@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
I would appriciate somebody who can help me, how to do a kernel
recompilation on linux 7.0 box. I need this to make oracle database
run. I have changed necessary variable values in sem.h and shmparam.h
files. but when i try to recompile kernel, it throws some error's
like, "num_cups declared twice", and exit with error-2.
Thanks & Regards
Bhanu
Systems Administrator
infoGlyptic Software Pvt Ltd
Bangalore
email: bhanun@...
Hi,
I am looking for the hi-availabilty(redundancy) solution for Linux
RH. Something like Veritas for Solaris. It has to be a LOCAL
filesystem shared between two Linux machines. NFS is not good enough
since it is not local. Can anybody point me out to something?
Thanks, Eduard
hello everyone
so here i am trying to install redhat 7 onto my windows 98se machine.
firstly i made a linux ext2 partition with partion magic, then used my windows
boot disk to access the cd drive , went into dosutils, then autoboot, got things
going . . .
but when i came to the install window ( picking custom ) the process gave up
with the error message ' no valid devices were found on which to create new
filesystems '
so can someone please inform me where i went wrong
much thanks
quilpi
I don't know if this helps, but there are several solutions that
effectively mirror servers over IP networks. I don't know exactly how
they do it, but they charge so much for the technology that it must be
reasonably reliable. It includes DNS fall back and stuff like that.
I can't remember what/who off the top of my head, but if you do a search
for "server network mirror" or similar on Google, you should find it.
Faris.
-----Original Message-----
From: eduard.goldberg@... [mailto:eduard.goldberg@...]
Sent: 04 October 2001 09:49
To: redhat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [redhat] Veritas-like solution for Linux
Hi,
I am looking for the hi-availabilty(redundancy) solution for Linux
RH. Something like Veritas for Solaris. It has to be a LOCAL
filesystem shared between two Linux machines. NFS is not good enough
since it is not local. Can anybody point me out to something?
Thanks, Eduard
Start posting to the redhat group using the following address:
redhat@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
----- Original Message -----
From: <quilpi@...>
> hello everyone
>
> so here i am trying to install redhat 7 onto my windows 98se machine.
> but when i came to the install window ( picking custom ) the process gave
up with the error message ' no valid devices were found on which to create
new filesystems '
Sounds like it's not seeing the hard drive. If I might, I'd recommend
skipping 7.0 and going to 7.1 I never used 7.0 but from what many many
people have said, it was horribly buggy.
Scott
>
> so
Hi,
Check your outgoing SMTP server address.I think this could be the
problem.There is no problem with hotmail server.The problem seems to
be at your end.Try pinging to your SMTP outgoing server and rectify
the problem.
Regards,
Mehul
--- In redhat@y..., "Fernando Barros" <fernando@o...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I´ve a problem with sendmail and i´ll explain it by this example:
>
> If i send an email to bob@c... , the email goes very fast without
> warnings.
> If i send an email to bob@h... the email stay in my outbox and the
> server keep trying to resolve the name with no sucessfull.
>
> I´m just having problem with hotmail!
>
> So i just wanna the sendmail doesnt need to resolve the recipient
email
> before send it
>
> thks!!
>
> <>-------------------<>
> Fernando Barros
> <>-------------------<>
Please!!
I have this rotine that read a file who contains some words(.bat, .exe,
.com), and if found it, the rotine needs to set up ExisteAnexos variable
like1. What is it wrog?
------------------
Excluir='cat /etc/mail/extensoes_a_excluir'
for conta in ${Excluir}; do
if grep $conta `${tmpdir}/filelist.txt; then
ExisteAnexos=1
Exclusos='cat ${tmpdir}/filelist.txt'
fi
done
-----------------------
Thks!,
Fernando
Sorry for the question, it may seem very stupid, but can anyone give my a
brief description about how to make a network from two computers running red
hat 7?
Saleh Diab
MCP sine 2000
www.salehd.8m.com
Send Email
