Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
revInterop · Revolution Interoperability Project
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Projects   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #476 of 497 |
There is a broad category of tools which could benefit from having some
definition of a "project", a list of all UI stacks, libraries, externals, etc.
that comprise a given product or system.

The types of tools that could use this information include installer makers,
version control systems, code analyzers, and even marketing support. If there
were a common definition of a "project", such tools could be used
interchangeably.

This raises a variety of questions:

1. Should a "project" be defined as a property of the mainstack for an app, or
should it be a separate file?

2. What info should be included in the definition for a "project"?

3. Is this actually useful, or could there be some other way of dealing with
multi-file deployments that may be quite different?

I'm very interested in your feedback.





Mon Apr 6, 2009 4:41 pm

fourth_world
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #476 of 497 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

There is a broad category of tools which could benefit from having some definition of a "project", a list of all UI stacks, libraries, externals, etc. that...
Richard Gaskin
fourth_world
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2009
4:48 pm

2009/4/6 Richard Gaskin <Ambassador@...> 1. Should a "project" be defined as a property of the mainstack for an app, ... I'd say a property of the...
David Bovill
fortyfoxes
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2009
12:19 am

Hi Richard Gaskin and RevInterop crowd, :) ... Indeed! I wholeheartedly agree. There is strength in unity! :-) ... This may or may not be useful to y'all,...
Alain Farmer
alain_farmer
Offline Send Email
Apr 10, 2009
7:56 pm

Alain- ... Yes! Absolutely. ... I'm not sure that "containing" one-or-more stacks would work. Maybe relative file paths to the various stacks and documents....
Mark Wieder
ahsoftware
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2009
4:02 am

... Isn't this going into building plist-type structures from OSX? Robert...
Robert Brenstein
robelko
Offline Send Email
Apr 28, 2009
5:52 pm

A simplistic answer might be "the components required to deliver the outcome". Required hardware (such as external servers and their software, data routing...
Hugh Senior
h_flco
Offline Send Email
Apr 11, 2009
12:44 pm

Richard- ... Very useful, but I'm wondering if it might not be possible to piggyback off the existing cRevStandaloneSettings propertyset of a stack? -- -Mark...
Mark Wieder
ahsoftware
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2009
3:47 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help