Chipp wrote a nifty and very complete handler for determining if a stack is visible to the user, named "isStackCurrentlyVisibleOnAnyMonitor". The handler was...
Richard, After you asked that, I got to thinking why would I want this function in stdLib? And in all the years of using Rev, I have never had the need to use...
... May be we should consider having two libs, stdLib for commonly used stuff and utilLib for stuff needed sporadically or in special circumstances only....
... Me neither. Though I can imagine—vaguely—a circumstance where I might want to. But then I'd probably also want to tweak it so that I would know which...
... I have a similar function I use called "isOnScreen" but I've only used it for one project so far, so IMHO it's not something I'd use often enough for ...
Richard- ... I don't really have an opinion about whether or not this should go into the stdLib - I think it's a clever hack and I'd like to have it stashed...
Hi, all. Looking at this thread together with the prior thread, it seems developers ought to choose what they want from the library, and register for updates....
There is a broad category of tools which could benefit from having some definition of a "project", a list of all UI stacks, libraries, externals, etc. that...
Hi Richard Gaskin and RevInterop crowd, :) ... Indeed! I wholeheartedly agree. There is strength in unity! :-) ... This may or may not be useful to y'all,...
A simplistic answer might be "the components required to deliver the outcome". Required hardware (such as external servers and their software, data routing...
Richard- ... Very useful, but I'm wondering if it might not be possible to piggyback off the existing cRevStandaloneSettings propertyset of a stack? -- -Mark...
Alain- ... Yes! Absolutely. ... I'm not sure that "containing" one-or-more stacks would work. Maybe relative file paths to the various stacks and documents....
I'd be real interested in starting to use / develop for the MC IDE, but don't want to have to switch between applications. Here are my thoughts on some future...
David- Monday, April 27, 2009, 5:48:55 AM, you wrote: Not to sidetrack the issue of an plugin interoperability structure, but the latest glx2 beta (both the...
... Hooray! I've been sidetracked for a while into web development with Django and Python etc. in my day job, but now I get to do a proof-of-concept in Rev...
Tereza- ... I seriously doubt it. What I had to implement in glx2 (and this goes back to the heart of the interoperability matter) is a switch like this...
Similarly I have a number of switches for things like (from memory): - ide_ScriptEditor - ide_SelectedScriptObject - ide_ScriptEditorField which switch...
... . . . ... A shame. Despite the virtues of GLX2, I long for the project editor (stack/object browser with search) and customized contextual menus of Galaxy....
hi- Recently the rev IDE's property inspector has gotten a bit over-zealous about not allowing keywords as custom property names (filed as BZ #8186), even if...
I use uRIP ["name"] pretty extensively by now - not keen on changing it just to get around RevIDE issues. If we did I guess, I'd go for a "type-of-component"...
David- Well, I'm not keen on changing it either, but if we want to encourage people to use the standard then we probably shouldn't have roadblocks like this. I...
... I would vote for not changing it. The Rev behavior in the PI is troublesome for more than just uRIP settings and needs to be fixed. Also, I think getting...
I write the uRip properties in a script Metadata header - on compile this is saved as a uRIP - that way I never need to check the custom properties because I...