The minutes from the meeting are below.
You can also get a PDF of Dean's presentation by going to:
http://www.rmiug.org/pres-080311.pdf
Thanks,
JZ
>>>>>>>>>>
Contactless Payments or CASH 2.0
About the Presenter:
Dean Rizzuto (Dean.Rizzuto@...) recently worked for one of the
only active Mobile Payment companies in the US actively taking live
payments, called MocaPay. Dean was involved in all aspects of the
mobile payment engine from transaction processing, Banking/ACH
interfaces, SMS gateway integration and support, customer and merchant
support, POS integration and support as well as the design and
implementation of the core payment transaction processing engine.
Dean's experience has provided him with a unique perspective of the
design, development, support and growth of a Mobile Payment engine
from one of the only companies in the US currently doing live Mobile
Payment transactions. Prior to working at Mocapay, Dean spent 10+
years in Online/Web Strategy and Analysis developing Website and Web
Application Strategies, developing Business and Functional
Requirements and producing and managing the implementation of
large-scale web applications and websites including nationally
recognized eCommerce sites, complex games associated with major
sporting events, citizen journalism, publishing platforms and many others.
Presentation
Most people in the audience have used cash, debit cards, credit cards.
Few of us have used cell phones to purchase items.
Why would consumers want to use this method to buy things?
Contact payment (credit or debit cards) how it works:
Players in this field:
Credit/debit cards (credit card processing players will also be
involved in contactless payment)
Cashier
Merchant Point of Sale (POS)
Mobile Handset
Acquiring bank (processes transactions)
Issuing bank (they issue the card to you)
Processing network (cost associated with line sending payment/credit
info)
Credit card associations
Typical credit card transaction
You hand card to cashier
Cashier runs it through the POS system or dials out; whatever the
process, it costs someone money to perform this process
Card account number, purchase amount, and merchant's purchase ID are
captured (the account number is captured from the magnetic stripe)
The acquiring bank routes the information to the credit card
association into the Transaction Network; they verify that the card is
valid
Credit card association routes to the Issuing Bank to check the
user's credit line (does the user have enough cash in account to make
this purchase?). These associations charge a fee, but they have a lot
of responsibility they verify whether the purchase is valid, card is
good, etc.
The purchase is approved or declined
Billing/invoicing occurs
Settlement (before the merchant actually gets the money in their bank
account) may take a few days from time of purchase
There's a lot of money involved in this process and many people
handle/touch the transaction
Detailed Scenario
Suppose Dean goes into a big box retailer (like Best Buy, Circuit
City, etc.)
Dean is buying an MP3 player that costs $150
2-3% of total purchase price is a transaction fee
The merchant actually receives between $144-147 (purchase price less
the transaction fee)
Acquirer Costs, Credit Card Association fees, and Issuing Bank fees
may be between $3-5 (Interchange fee)
Issuing Bank handles the following:
Revenue Costs
Interest fees Billing / invoicing
Late payment fees Charge backs
Over credit limit fees Fraud prevention
Processing fees Fraud recovery
Rewards points
Interchange fees
What affects the amount a Merchant pays to accept credit/debit/smartcards?
Type of merchant
Also average transaction amount
Is card information hand-keyed in or magnetic stripe read?
Is the card physically present? (phone or ecommerce trans)
Card type (business cards cost more to process)
Settlement date: the sooner merchant wants to receive payment, the
more they might have to pay
Why pay by credit card?
Consumers:
Convenience
Speed
Tracking
Get points
Merchants:
Speed
More secure than checks (because the bank guarantees the transaction)
Discourages employee theft
Security associated with credit cards
Security is low, Fraud is very high
Issuers are trying to reduce fraud to manageable levels, since it
can't be completely eliminated
What is the cost to merchants and consumers?
o Big box retailers: get paid quickly and cost isn't that high
o Consumers: need a PIN, a CVV (card verification value on back of
card), SmartCards
Contactless Payments Scenario
Scenario: you are buying a cup of coffee
Cost is $1.60
3-6% of that cost are transaction network fees (approximately $.25)
Merchant receives approximately $1.30 1.25
Acquiring bank costs, credit card association fees, issuing bank
they get $.05 - .10 for this purchase
Merchant must ask:
Can I afford to take credit cards for purchases? OR
Can I afford NOT to take credit cards for purchases?
How much is actually being saved by not taking credit cards?
RFID chip can be included in many things such as cell phones. iPods,
keychains, bracelets. RFID reader sits on counter and reads your chip.
Why consider contactless payments?
Consumers:
Convenience
Speed
Tracking
Points
Merchant:
Speed
More secure than checks
Average speed of transactions
Cash transaction takes 34 secs
Mag stripe card transaction takes 24 secs
Smartcard transaction takes15 secs
SmartCard contactless payments (contains an RFID chip)
Can be used for purchases that are less than $25 (no signature required)
Increase holder's propensity to spend (a plus for merchants)
Card never has to leave the holder's hand feels more secure
Disadvantages:
New equipment is needed for merchants
Doesn't work in all transaction situations (where pre-authorization
is required; tipping the wait staff)
SmartCards and Security
It's secure because the device is always in purchaser's hand
Phantom reader scenarios are unfounded (being too close to reader,
accidental scan) because of security:
o Triple DES with 128-bit encryption
o Account information is not transmitted (just transmits a transaction
number), unlike magnetic stripe cards
Similar cardholder liability limitations on SmartCards; liability is
fairly limited in case of fraud
Unproven technology, so some users may be scared to use them
Mobile Phone Contactless Payments
RFID (or Near Field Communication NFC) based
o Similar security issues to SmartCards
Another mouth to feed (transmission costs money)
Beyond RFID Mobile Phone/Technology Advancement
Mobile Phones
Processing Power
Internet/data connectivity (SSL)
Native applications can be developed to run on the phone
Graphical interfaces (can use bar codes). Companies can send coupons
with bar code via cell phone
People are more likely to leave their wallet at home rather than
their cell phone, so it's a definite part of their daily life
Typical RFID transaction
Very similar to typical credit card transaction slide
Big difference is that an encrypted transaction code is passed
rather than the user's account number
This transaction uses the existing infrastructure used by credit
card systems
How can we use cell phone in ways that don't follow the typical path,
cut out some of the processing/transaction fees, middlemen, etc.?
Most likely scenario:
RFID/NFC
Use same magnetic stripe infrastructure
Players remain the same
Costs will probably be consistent
Alternatives include:
SMS or
Internet technology
SMS Based Scenario (similar to MocaPay)
Set up account with them (all cash based)
User enters store about to make a transaction and enters PIN into
cell phone (Sends SMS, which includes PIN, phone number)
Text message goes to SMS aggregator and based on information from
user, validates information and returns a purchase code back to user
Give code to clerk to make purchase
Cashier enters code and sends it to MocaPay server; purchase is
approved or declined.
Settlement happens every night so merchants get paid daily
Flat $.19 transaction fee charged by MocaPay for all purchases,
regardless of amount
High security because each phone has its own PIN and you need that
phone and that PIN to make a purchase.
Potential problems:
SMS Aggregator may be very busy or down
Cell phone doesn't have enough power or reception to make a call
Challenges to merchant:
Need separate card reader or integrate into merchant's existing POS
system.
Cashier must understand how to use it; they must be trained how to
use it
Internet-Based Scenario
1. Chase puts cell-top application on cell phone.
2. Securely sends PIN, phone ID, Merchant ID, Purchase amount
3. Phone is GPS-enabled so it pulls merchant ID into phone and pushes
it out, via SSL, to the Internet.
4. Validation: PIN, Phone ID, Funds availability (all via Internet/SSL)
5. Once information is validated, it's sent to POS and receipt it
automatically printed. This is contactless (no cashier is involved).
Another example:
You go to supermarket with a cart filled with items.
You walk by an RFID reader
Cost of all items is calculated and you are given a payment total
for the entire purchase.
Security of Other Models
Mobile phone all can use SSL, so it's better than having phone in
hand. Account can be tied to your physical phone, so you can't take
another person's phone and access your account.
Limitations
No connectivity, connectivity problems in remote locations
You run out of battery power on your cell phone
SMS charges (may be costly)
SMS Aggregator problems (slow or down)
Contactless payments What's in it for me?
Mobile Carriers
Increased data and Internet usage on phone plans
More loyalty to cell phone carriers because it's too much trouble to
switch all information to another carrier
Sell more units
Other RFID applications (handset manufacturers). Chip is already in
handset so it can be used for lots of other applications. Enables more
commerce can buy tickets with your phone and using your phone as the
actual ticket.
Credit Card Issuers
Ways to extend their current reach
Want you to use existing infrastructure and want to stay in the loop
Cut into cash payments; they want you to use cards instead of cash
Less credit cards issues; cost saving for them
Regular credit card business will still exist ATMs, for example
Merchants
Lower transaction costs
Minimal equipment changes/upgrades
More transactions = more money
Contactless buyers may spend more
Embrace new technology; be tech-friendly
Change need less cash on hand and no making change for customers
Amex says: ExpressPay transaction is less than both cash and credit,
and typically users spend more
Consumers
Device/card is secure because it never leaves your hand
Same liability as with credit cards
All-in-one device Electronic Wallet
o Link phone to online banking
Money transfers
o All accounts available
Summary contactless payments
The technology is here; it's just a matter of time before it's used by
mainstream. Over next few years, technology will grow.
Make most sense for merchants with high-volume, cash-driven
QSRs (quick serve restaurants) - 80% of trans under $25 mean
transaction is $12
Movie theaters
Mass transit; some have even set up their own systems
Adoption of technology
Chicken / egg (merchants are waiting on users and vice versa)
Potential fraud risk is much smaller
Architecture
Standardized protocols (ISO 14443). Agreement that all transmissions
will be done in the same manner
RFID on cell phone
Other scenarios ticketing, contests, etc.
Q & A
Q. RFID how long has it been small enough to use in mobile devices?
A. For awhile and now it's more secure. Technology has been around for
awhile but it's become improved and more secure. This is primarily
used for US-based transactions right now. iPhone takes away the need
for the cell phone company to be involved (because it uses WiFi) and
takes a cut.
Q. What happens to ecommerce transactions if this technology takes off?
A. Might need credit card for those scenarios; this is one of the
areas that needs to be ironed out. Company that accomplishes this task
will have a great product.
Volume may lower the $.19 transaction fee charged by companies like
MocaPay. Big retailers have the ability to leverage their costs by
their volume. There is a hope that high overhead costs will go down.
Points are a big draw for using credit cards. But contactless payment
providers are exploring ways to reward users for using their service.
Part of the problem is that companies that want to use this technology
must educate their cashiers/workers, etc. about how to use it.
Education is a big part of the puzzle.
MocaPay technology may be more critical as a technology than as a
consumer product.