Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
roddier · Roddier Test
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 573 - 603 of 683   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
573
Group - anyone have a link to a site where I could download Roddier v.1.0 and/or Roddier v.1.5? I am still studying results differences between versions and...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Oct 6, 2008
8:18 pm
574
Group - I have posted to the Files section (folder Test Results Comparison) a revised version of the original test results table (see post #572)and a new...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Oct 10, 2008
12:48 am
575
Group - I have uploaded test results from some additional image pairs run through three different versions of Roddier software: Beta 0.4 WinRoddier2.0 ...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Oct 17, 2008
10:15 pm
576
Mick, I read with interest your results and want to recognize the effort you put into it. Here are my observations: The images you submitted have a lot of...
glenn_jolly
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
12:29 am
577
... Mr. Jolly - thanks much for having a look at the test images and study results. Sorry to say, I don't have any good way to examine image statistics myself...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2008
11:55 pm
578
Mick, I placed the recipe for creating test images using Aberrator30 and the images used in a folder called Perfect150. Let me know what you think. Glenn ...
glenn_jolly
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
4:26 am
579
... Mr. Jolly - splendid. I will get back at this investigation today (Mon 3 Nov) or tomorrow and am most interested to see what comes of it. Thanks much for...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
6:29 pm
580
Group in the referenced message, second paragraph of my reply, the following statement is made: "Each image was around 900 frames out of 1024 stacked in...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
6:40 pm
581
Roddier users: Should have cautioned the following about the use of Aberrator as a means to generate test images. The images created including the PSF and...
glenn_jolly
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
6:59 pm
582
Hi Mick, I finally got a chance to start catching-up with your excellent tests from October. I put a PDF file in Files > Test Results Comparison > Comparison...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
11:45 pm
583
... Dr. Biretta - welcome back and many congratulations on getting Hubble operating again. ... Seems like the above must be important points. I have not been...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Nov 4, 2008
4:40 am
584
Dr. Biretta/Group - I have placed in the Files section (Test Results Comparison folder, Comparison IV sub-folder) some images, results, and a small...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Nov 4, 2008
11:25 pm
585
Hi Mick, Here are some thoughts: 1- I would think that Roddier was optimized for an obstructed scope because I believe it was originally designed with a...
Ron Jones
ron8f8
Offline Send Email
Nov 5, 2008
1:15 am
586
... Results ... and ... astigmatism ... with ... out ... usually ... Introducing CO to an imperfect optics WILL change resulting Zernike coeffitients....
bratislav3162
Offline Send Email
Nov 5, 2008
2:07 am
587
Two points: 1)Aberrator can be used for qualitative checks only. As I said earlier, Aberrator uses what Cor Berrevoets calls a special gamma function for...
glenn_jolly
Offline Send Email
Nov 5, 2008
2:45 pm
588
Mick, Glenn, et al., A couple quick thoughts on this Central Obstruction business: (a) I think there is indeed something to the Aberrator gamma problem. I ran...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Nov 5, 2008
9:26 pm
590
Dr. Biretta/Mr. Jolly/Group - profound thanks for the extremely interesting and useful discussions of my test images/analyses and their interpretations and...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Nov 6, 2008
2:29 am
591
What power should you take the star test at for a 4" APO. I have some at 272X and some at 136X and they both give VERY different results. Thanks,...
teche70
Offline Send Email
Nov 28, 2008
3:07 am
592
Hi. I usually think in terms of pixels. Between 80 and 150 pixel diameter for the star images seems to work well. I don't know what detector size you have --...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Nov 28, 2008
3:11 am
593
Thanks John, I used a Phillips SPC900 webcam which I think is 5.6 micron/pixel. When you say blank space around the star images do you mean when you select the...
teche70
Offline Send Email
Nov 28, 2008
10:43 am
594
... OK, so that chip is 640 x 480 pixels. ... you ... covers ... Yes. ... For you detector, you want images that are between 1/6th to 1/3rd the height of the...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Nov 28, 2008
10:54 am
595
... Group - using some suggested technique improvements from experienced group members (wider image crop window with images further from window egdes,...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
3:42 am
596
... snip ... In other words one wants an image about 100 or 200 pixels diameter, right? I am working with a monochrome astro camera (ST2000) not a web cam. Is ...
ancient.sull
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2008
11:43 pm
597
IIRC, the original Roddier test required at least a 16-bit camera. Averaging was done by a 30sec exposure. The details are in the Roddier paper in the files...
Tanveer Gani
burdbeen
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
12:32 am
598
Group - the title line for message #595 is erroneous and misleading. The tests discussed in #595 were not done using simulated images but were on images of...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
6:23 am
599
... Yes, thats about right. I usually aim for 80 to 160 pixels diameter. I've gone as low as 40 pixels with reasonable results. There is some trade-off...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
7:51 am
600
Mick, I think you have good results with the C6R - you know you need that mask and you end up with a really fine 5.5" instrument! I'm interested in your 10"...
glenn_jolly
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
6:22 pm
601
... Mr. Jolly - thanks for the interest and advice that the Newt mirror is probably pretty good. Concerning the 10 inch newt: I have been assuming that...
m_hollimon
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2008
6:57 pm
602
I'm trying to get the program running using the C11 test images in the files section. After I open the files and set the parameters, I click on the tests...
piekielrl
Offline Send Email
Dec 18, 2008
4:34 pm
603
Hi Bob, Maybe I see what is happening. The thresholds have not been set yet, and the default thresholds do not work for those images. Try this.... Using...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Dec 18, 2008
6:46 pm
Messages 573 - 603 of 683   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help