Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
roddier · Roddier Test
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 94 - 123 of 683   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
94
I've been using a 50 micron pinhole from Edmund Optics. I can also add Narrow Band filters to the assembly if I want. I have sometimes used the solar glint off...
Don Klabunde
dpk_faculae
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2007
11:14 pm
95
Using a 50um artificial star set approx 100feet away from my C11 on Jan 27, 2007 I collected some intra/extra Toucam web data. I opened my observatory up 2hrs...
foogesowl
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2007
10:15 pm
96
Hi Steve, ... it ... align, ... my ... right ... I have sometimes also seen this problem where Roddier fails to align the images. It usually results from some...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Feb 6, 2007
1:34 am
97
PS -- I suggest to also post the "wavefront" image which Roddier makes. Sometimes there are interesting clues there....
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Feb 6, 2007
1:37 am
98
Couple more thoughts. The 50 micron pinhole at 100 feet is about 0.34 arcseconds. The resolution of the C11 is about 0.36 arcseconds. So pinhole is just...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Feb 6, 2007
2:00 am
99
John, thanks for your feedback. I just posted a screen shot of the wavefront data, although I don't really understand what it means. I totally agree that...
foogesowl
Offline Send Email
Feb 6, 2007
3:48 am
100
Wavefront map mostly looks like coma (collimation a little off) and various types of spherical on top of that. I think that you are already getting 71% Strehl...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Feb 6, 2007
12:25 pm
101
John, My last collimation was done for the first time using http://www.astrogeeks.com/Bliss/MetaGuide/ software which involves real time collimation feedback...
foogesowl
Offline Send Email
Feb 6, 2007
5:07 pm
102
Thanks for posting! The test is sensitive to the actual focal length of the telescope. While a SCT is labeled f/10, IIRC they have longer focal lengths when...
blandp11
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2007
3:06 am
103
Ops, posted under the wrong thread! This was meant to be about the '86 C11. Philip...
blandp11
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2007
3:09 am
104
Philip, I just inputted my 2.5x barlowed intra/extra data (7000mm focal length) into the Roddier program and the strehl number increased from 0.71 to 0.85. I...
foogesowl
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2007
4:35 am
105
Hi Group Tomorrow, I am going to take some inside & outside of star focus images using my 132mm WO FLT refractor and SXV-H9 ccd camera and was wondering how...
Chris Appleton
bingsca
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
2:00 am
106
Hi Chris, I do not have your exact setup, so my advice is only of a general nature. You will want to expose long enough to average-out "seeing" effects --...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
2:26 am
107
... Hi John Thank you very much for the kind words and helpful suggestions. Here is my setup Losmandy G11/Gemini Level 4 goto Starlightxpress SXV-H9 16 bit...
Chris Appleton
bingsca
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
3:36 am
108
... Hi John I also forgot to mention that my WO FLT refractor has graduated markings on both the focuser drawtube and camera angle adjuster. I will take...
Chris Appleton
bingsca
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
3:41 am
109
... is ... design. OK, this sounds like a good setup. So I would suggest to take several sub-images maybe 30 or 60 seconds at each focus position. You can...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
2:20 pm
110
... Yes, these markings on the drawtube will certainly make things easier. You should end-up with patterns having about the same diameter on the computer...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
2:24 pm
111
... Thank you John for the great advice, I will give it a try and let you know how things turned out. Cheers, Chris A ... I...
Chris Appleton
bingsca
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
9:16 pm
112
Hello everybody, I'm trying to get a handle on doing this testing correctly, and then repeatably. The scope I'm testing is a 10" f5.47 with a 1.83" diameter...
blukasik_vjt
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2007
10:33 pm
113
Hi Bob, After puzzling over your images for a while, some comments: I think your basic technique is sound. The images seem well exposed without obvious...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2007
12:05 am
114
Hi John, Thanks for the informative reply. The camera is an Imaging source DBK21af04.as. The CCD is similar (maybe identical) to the ToUcam. This is a RAW...
blukasik_vjt
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2007
1:26 am
115
Interesting report! The use you are putting the Roddier test to is one of the reasons I think it's so exciting. Try the test again on a single star as high...
blandp11
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2007
3:26 pm
116
Bob, Looks like you have the technique well in-hand, and just need some better seeing, and maybe a little collimation work. These seeing "slow waves but very...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2007
8:08 pm
117
Hi Group Last week I tried to take 1 sec, 10 sec, 30 sec and 60 sec images of the star Dubhe from 3mm to 9mm outside & inside of focus using the green filter....
Chris Appleton
bingsca
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2007
7:57 pm
118
Hi Chris, If I recall you are using a conventional CCD camera in a 132mm scope? Yes, it is likely far over-exposed. I use very bright stars, but I am also...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2007
9:25 pm
119
The Roddier test does not use the classic star testing diffraction ring pattern that we are familiar with from visual star testing. The images are taken much...
blandp11
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2007
9:26 pm
120
We seem to be on the same schedule for Yahoo groups reading... ;) Philip...
blandp11
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2007
9:33 pm
121
Yes, like Philip says, it would be good if you could take lots of short images (<1 second to few seconds) and then stack them up. This also avoids potential...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2007
9:36 pm
122
... Hi Philip and John Thank you very much for the suggestions. I will try a 4 to 5th mag star tonight and take < 1 sec exposures. Philip, I looked at your ...
Chris Appleton
bingsca
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2007
11:10 pm
123
Chris, Yes, the images are just far over-exposed. There is a fainter star below and right of the bright one, and that shows rings and nice details. That is...
zeissnut
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2007
11:31 pm
Messages 94 - 123 of 683   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help