Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
rpm-list · Redhat RPM List
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 19809 - 19838 of 26827   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
19809
... But in any case BuildRoot has a value: defaut, specified in the spec file or specified in the macros file. So, override specified in spec file value have a...
Valery Reznic
valery_reznic@...
Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
10:31 am
19810
I'm attempting to make an rpm of the Python interpreter, version 2.2.2. When doing the initial build from source, I needed to create two new files,...
Tom Shore
tshore@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
8:20 pm
19811
Hi all, Is there a way to build an RPM that won't execute the preun and postun scripts during an upgrade? I have some files that need not to be deleted during...
Joe Luong
Joe.Luong@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
2:25 am
19812
... Start with the .spec file in .../python/dist/src/Misc/RPM ? -- KBK _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list ...
Kurt B. Kaiser
kbk@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
4:19 am
19813
Joe- I ran into the same issue a few months ago, looks like I missed the section of Max RPM that contains how to do this, here is the answer.. Regards, --Nick ...
Buro, Nicholas
nicholas_buro@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
3:44 pm
19814
Hello and happy new one, there are more and more rpm repositories created (even I have one ... ;), which bring up this old bug in rpmvercmp: ... I checked...
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
4:14 pm
19815
... There's progress on the issue, you just don't know what to look for ;-) rpm-4.1 now treats a missing/unspecified epoch as Epoch: 0. See how many package...
Jeff Johnson
jbj@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
4:50 pm
19816
... Nah, modulo 3 doesn't work. Neither do any of bash$ dc 503 2 % p 1 503 3 % p 2 503 5 % p 3 503 7 % p 6 503 11 % p 8 503 13 % p 9 503 17 % p 10 503 19 % p 9...
Jeff Johnson
jbj@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
5:10 pm
19817
... I noticed in his original email he was actually asking about 00503 being less than 6, not 503. Clearly there's a special case that could be defined for...
Chris Garrigues
cwg-rpm@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
5:37 pm
19818
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 11:36:28AM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote: Hmmm, comparison modulo 503 make 503 < 6 ;-) ... Yup, finding what breaks with any new scheme...
Jeff Johnson
jbj@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
5:44 pm
19819
... I think I found it: Consider 3 values: 00503, 6, 10 00503 < 6 (00503 lt 006) 6 < 10 10 < 00503 (0010 lt 00503) So as soon as perl got to version...
Chris Garrigues
cwg-rpm@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
6:04 pm
19820
... [..] Better find/complet maintainers list which perl modules are incorrectly versioned and send them short instruction how to correctly manage versionig...
Tomasz Koczko
kloczek@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
7:10 pm
19821
... But this doesn't fix the problem with non-antisymmetric ordering operator. This should be fixed as foo-1.2.a and foo-1.2.1 are currently both ... But it...
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
7:22 pm
19822
... Yes, it doesn't. ... OK, so you *really* want bugzilla #50977 (iirc) fixed. What's going to be needed first is idetification of actual, not potential ...
Jeff Johnson
jbj@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
9:02 pm
19823
... I would be happy to gather a list of all the EVRs from all released RHL versions from 6.2 to current, along with as many errata versions as I can find....
Peter Bowen
pzb@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
9:53 pm
19824
... Thank you, that would help a lot. ... <grin> We appear to agree: "minimum ... necessary". Note carefully, however, that the difference between how dpkg and...
Jeff Johnson
jbj@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
10:10 pm
19825
Thank you for your response, Nick. ... From: Buro, Nicholas [mailto:nicholas_buro@...] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:43 AM To: 'rpm-list@...' ...
Joe Luong
Joe.Luong@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
11:52 pm
19826
Hi, I am using 'Alternate Root' support (i.e. --root) a lot, beyond the normal use from a ramdisk based starter system. Because with Linux for on zSeries with...
Rob van der Heij
rvdheij@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2003
11:13 am
19827
--On Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:12 PM +0100 Rob van der Heij ... Interesting issue. I suppose that things like user-adds should really be done by...
Kenneth Porter
shiva@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2003
4:13 pm
19828
... Or by separate setup tools that the administrator can run before enabling a service. Debian's dpkg/apt system gets this right via a sort of "configure"...
Jim Knoble
jmknoble@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2003
11:45 pm
19829
Hi there all, I am just tring to find out what Epoch is meant to represent in a spec file. I have checked max-rpm and the mandrake rpm howto but they dont seem...
Michael Honeyfield
mhoneyfield@...
Send Email
Jan 5, 2003
3:35 am
19830
... It is an abomination (though a necessary one, I keep telling myself) wherein the packager can override all other versioning information. A package with an...
Joe Cooper
joe@...
Send Email
Jan 5, 2003
3:59 am
19831
I see, Thank You kindly for the heads up :) I haven't been using, just saw it in a couple of rpms I was updating and wonder what it was about. Once again...
Michael Honeyfield
mhoneyfield@...
Send Email
Jan 5, 2003
4:03 am
19832
--On Saturday, January 04, 2003 9:57 PM -0600 Joe Cooper ... It exists to deal with broken version information in the original package, like the Perl...
Kenneth Porter
shiva@...
Send Email
Jan 5, 2003
2:56 pm
19833
... Yes, it exists for a reason...but if you use it you're stuck with an epoch forever. I prefer to accept the problem the first time around (making a note to ...
Joe Cooper
joe@...
Send Email
Jan 5, 2003
9:06 pm
19834
... That would not solve anything is one is using an automatic dependency resolver (or whatever name it is used), like apt-get. I do agree that epoch should be...
Rodrigo Barbosa
rodrigob@...
Send Email
Jan 5, 2003
9:32 pm
19835
Hello, I have created a rpm package. But when I try to install it, it gives the following error. [root@test1 i386]# rpm -i test-2.0-B16.i386.rpm error: failed...
Manjula
mramacha@...
Send Email
Jan 6, 2003
12:36 pm
19836
... I think, at least one of the scripts in your test-2.0-B16 package contains line #!/sbin/sh So, or change this script(s) if you can use something else, or...
Valery Reznic
valery_reznic@...
Send Email
Jan 6, 2003
12:46 pm
19837
Hello, Thanks, It worked..I had a script which was using /sbin/sh. Changing it to /bin/sh worked. Regs, Manjula ... ...
Manjula
mramacha@...
Send Email
Jan 6, 2003
1:06 pm
19838
Hello, Also what should I install if I should not get dependency error for libncurses.so.4 error: failed dependencies: libncurses.so.4 Regs, Manjula Hello, ...
Manjula
mramacha@...
Send Email
Jan 6, 2003
1:08 pm
Messages 19809 - 19838 of 26827   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help