Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
rpm-list · Redhat RPM List
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 25686 - 25715 of 26827   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
25686
Hi, For some reason I thought the rpm version/release comparison was done by comparing the dotted components, but this does not seem to be the case. For...
Jos Vos
jos@...
Send Email
Jan 1, 2005
10:33 pm
25687
... A change between alphabetic characters and numeric ones is considered as two components as if there was a dot in between. Thus you have for your first...
Robert Schiele
rschiele@...
Send Email
Jan 1, 2005
10:41 pm
25688
Wojtek and Hal, Thanks very much for your replies. After your posts I was able to get the result I wanted. It would appear that inexperience was my biggest ...
John
rpm@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2005
3:55 am
25689
Hi all, I've created an SRPM for a program called osiris (osiris.shmoo.com). During the creation I wanted to add in 2 additional modules which come in separate...
Jason Frisvold
xenophage0@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2005
4:38 am
25690
... Do the tar files contain the actual subdirectory? (That's pretty standard.) If so, just totally leave off the -n flags. (And don't do -b on the first one.)...
Matthew Miller
mattdm@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2005
7:54 am
25691
... Or: first second pkg-1.0-3 3 pkg-1.0-3A 3 A pkg-1.0-3A.B 3 A.B pkg-1.0-3.B 3 B Explained in: /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.3.1/dependencies as: The algorithm that...
Dag Wieers
dag@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2005
11:08 am
25692
... That's the problem .. The second 2 tar files do not.. I need to change into the subdirectory first... I can re-package these, but that means I'm no...
Jason Frisvold
xenophage0@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2005
2:30 pm
25693
... Incidentally, if it helps, the SRPM is here : http://www.godshell.com/osiris ... -- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold XenoPhage0@... ...
Jason Frisvold
xenophage0@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2005
2:30 pm
25694
... You can always untar them without using the setup macro.... -- Matthew Miller mattdm@... <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University...
Matthew Miller
mattdm@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2005
6:12 pm
25695
... But won't that break cross-distribution installations? I can't be 100% sure that tar and gzip are in the same location across all distributions... I'm...
Jason Frisvold
xenophage0@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
1:46 am
25696
... It won't matter at install time, just at build time. And as long as it's in the builder's path, which it oughta be, no problem. (And if it fails, that's a...
Matthew Miller
mattdm@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
2:13 am
25697
Hi All, Am new to RPM signing stuff. Can anyone let me know this :- -Which is the lowest version of RPM that supports signing on these platforms - SuSE Linux...
Manoj S
hellhogger@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
6:01 am
25698
... [...] RPM has supported signing for a long time -- according to the changelog, GPG support was added in 2.90, and PGP support even earlier. I don't think ...
Matthew Miller
mattdm@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
6:51 am
25699
On Friday, 31 December 2004, at 01:03:15 (+0000), ... Mezzanine does this for specgen. The spec files it generates contain the following lines: Release:...
Michael Jennings
mej@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
7:50 pm
25700
Hi, i develop a small rpm-frontend in java. The main feature is to check if a package could be installed without the requirement to download it first. I find...
Ralf Lehmann
ralf@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
8:03 pm
25701
... Yes, the requirements, but not problems with conflicting files, version comparison, the fact that other packages might conflict with this one, etc. It is...
Jos Vos
jos@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
8:08 pm
25702
Hi, I was going to use rpm2html but README file begins with "PROJECT is dead, if someone feels like taking over, contact me, I will provide all bits I have." ...
ACario
acario@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
9:00 pm
25703
... I'm a little confused by this whole duplicate RPM business as well. I recently installed FC3 on a new AMD64 machine. I noticed that some RPMs were...
Vadim Nasardinov
vadimn@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
10:15 pm
25704
... If you manage to compile it, you may use it, but if it fails, break, overwrite your / with html files or burn your /var/www partition I don't want to hear...
Daniel Veillard
veillard@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
10:21 pm
25705
... In what sense? Files/directories can be owned by multiple packages *if* they are exactly the same (otherwise the packages would conflict). This happened in...
Jos Vos
jos@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
10:23 pm
25706
... You and apt both. :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@... <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------>...
Matthew Miller
mattdm@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
10:30 pm
25707
... I didn't want any harm inflicted on my /var/www partition, so I hacked up a quick and ugly script that, in its current form, would most likely be useless...
Vadim Nasardinov
vadimn@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2005
10:42 pm
25708
... Well, except for elf binaries. if they are binaries and two files would conflict and they are 32bit and 64bit package binaries they're checked to see which...
seth vidal
skvidal@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2005
12:28 am
25709
... Then 'rpm --erase' one of the packages. Then 'rpm --verify' the other package. The 'erase' will have removed the files which were in common. At least...
Bob Proulx
bob@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2005
1:05 am
25710
... Try: rpm -U --test ftp://package.xyz.rpm There still could be package dependent checking in the package's %pre scriptlet that would cause a real install to...
Hal Wine
hal@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2005
1:35 am
25711
Hi, I have try to install a x86_64 and i386 package on my EM64T machine. But the behaviour you mention did not happened. ie. the 32bit binary file from i386...
John Lau
cflau@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2005
4:49 am
25712
... did you INSTALL them or did you update them? you can update i386 over x86_64 with rpm. But if you install it it won't be the same. -sv ...
seth vidal
skvidal@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2005
4:51 am
25713
Hi, I have tried both install and update, same result. My RPM version is 4.2.2, of RHWS3 update 2. Best regards, John Lau ... -- John Lau Chi Fai ...
John Lau
cflau@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2005
4:55 am
25714
... Ok i can not detect conflicts on this way. But is there a other possibility? What i want is to test if the package could be installed without complete...
Ralf Lehmann
ralf@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2005
7:54 am
25715
Hal Wine wrote, around 01/03/2005 17:34:07 ... No only "rpm -qp" command reads only the header all other commands download the package first. so i must find a...
Ralf Lehmann
ralf@...
Send Email
Jan 4, 2005
5:32 pm
Messages 25686 - 25715 of 26827   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help