rcade wrote:
> A new draft of the RSS Feed Autodiscovery specification has been
> published:
>
> http://www.rssboard.org/rss-autodiscovery
>
> The board's vote on this proposal ends today, so please let us know if
> anything needs to be addressed.

I don't believe its fair to do these kind of major changes and then not
reset the voting period.

Less than two hours after making these changes, you announced that this
vote 'passed' the board.

My recommendation is this:
Version all future specifications. Vote on SPECIFIC versions. If a new
version is made available, vote on it with a new voting period. Maybe
we need a deeper separate discussion thread on this.

In the open source world, you would vote on a release tag, rather than
the state of 'trunk'...

> This draft incorporates the following changes based on feedback here
> and on Randy's RSS blog.
>
> Major Changes
>
> * removed suggestion to use this spec with Atom

-1 against this spec with this change.

We should create and support something that works with all feeds, both
RSS and Atom, in an interoperable manner.

-Paul