Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
rss-board
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #284 of 292 |
Re: [rss-board] Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

I vote +1 for all changes. I just want to share my 2cents about the following edit.

> 6. The definitions for skipHours and skipDays in the supporting document [10] are extremely short. I'd like to bring them into the specification's optional channel elements section [11] by replacing "More info here" with the definitions.
>

I would prefer to add 2 new sections called

<skipHours> sub-element of <channel>
<skipDays> sub-element of <channel>

and refer to these sections from the element table instead of moving all the content into the main table.

I never really understood why some elements deserved a specific section (image, cloud, ttl) while others are just listed in the element table with a short description (generator, category...).
In the past I received feedback that this approach makes the document less easier to read.

I would propose (perhaps in a future discussion) to

1. improve the readability of the documentation (for example with section numbers 1, 1.1.2, 2.1, 2.1.1...)
2. create an extended section for any element in the channel and item table and refer to the specific sections from the elements table along with examples and tips.


-- Simone

Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:42 pm

wepposcarletti
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #284 of 292 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Today begins the seven-day vote on the six proposed admin edits to the RSS spec. I've restated the proposal in full here: I'd like the board to consider some...
rcade
Offline Send Email
Mar 20, 2009
6:09 pm

I vote +1 for these changes. Thanks, Paul...
Paul Querna
pquerna
Online Now Send Email
Mar 20, 2009
6:22 pm

I vote in favor of all of these proposed edits....
scamden
Offline Send Email
Mar 20, 2009
11:41 pm

+1 -- Ryan Parman <http://ryanparman.com> On Mar 20, 2009, at 4:41 PM, "scamden" <sterling@...>...
Ryan Parman
skyzyxufks
Offline Send Email
Mar 21, 2009
12:23 am

I vote yes for the proposal....
rcade
Offline Send Email
Mar 21, 2009
2:04 am

... In the interests of completeness, I noticed another difference between the two versions of the enclosure use-case document: ...
James Holderness
james_holder...
Offline Send Email
Mar 22, 2009
12:15 pm

I vote +1 for all changes. I just want to share my 2cents about the following edit. ... [10] are extremely short. I'd like to bring them into the...
Simone Carletti
wepposcarletti
Offline Send Email
Mar 22, 2009
5:03 pm

I vote in favor of the edits...
Randy Morin
randymorin
Offline Send Email
Mar 25, 2009
3:43 pm

All the amendments are approved. Voting Results were 7-0 in favor. For: Querna,Camdem,Parman,Cadenhead,Holderness,Carletti,Morin Against: none Didn't vote:...
Randy Morin
randymorin
Offline Send Email
Mar 28, 2009
3:26 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help