As I've previous written here, we've been working on official specification for RSS autodiscovery. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-autodiscovery To date, there has...
+1 . Nice and simple. About the only thing I would have added is that, if there is more than one feed referenced (even though it is NOT RECOMMENDED), that the...
... I'm copying this to RSS-Public since I have a few comments and the document suggested discussing comments and corrections there. On the whole, it looks...
Some other suggestions that you may want to consider incorporating in the spec: - Describe the differences in implementation between HTML and XHTML (possibly...
... For the record I'm +1. I'd like to see some of the issues addressed that have been discussed in rss-public, but if there are strong objections to any...
... I am also +1 on the current spec. I also agree with all of the points James has raised, and would like to see another revision incorporating some of them. ...
A new draft of the RSS Feed Autodiscovery specification has been published: http://www.rssboard.org/rss-autodiscovery The board's vote on this proposal ends...
The proposal to create and publish an RSS Autodiscovery specification has passed the RSS Advisory Board with members Matthew Bookspan, Rogers Cadenhead, Jason...
... I don't believe its fair to do these kind of major changes and then not reset the voting period. Less than two hours after making these changes, you...
Paul, I agree with your concern regarding the timing. So that we don't appear to be ramming this thru, I would be fine with a re-vote. As for Atom. We don't...
... Our charter requires a vote to end after seven days. This is our first substantive specification, and I think we can address your concerns in this manner: ...
... This sounds acceptable to me, as long as in number 2, you are voting on a spec that does not change, at all, during the voting period. Any changes to me...
... That's a good rule of thumb. We should freeze a proposal's language when the voting period begins. If changes need to be made before the vote ends, the...
WHAT-WG is actively seeking input on their definition of feed autodiscovery links, which is part of a Web Applications 1.0 specification under development they...
... I second the proposal to reopen the RSS autodiscovery specification for a vote. This begins one week of discussion followed by one week of voting. Changes,...
Since we're putting this back on the floor, I think we should consider recasting the autodiscovery specification as an autodiscovery profile, a set of...
Yahoo Groups produces invalid author elements in its RSS 2.0 feeds -- they aren't valid e-mail addresses. Though this is a minor error for most consumers of...
The draft spec for RSS 2.0 has been updated: http://www.rssboard.org/rss-draft-1 Changes: 1. In item-description, changed "The description MUST be suitable for...
... The seven-day revote begins today on the RSS Autodiscovery spec. The text has not been revised since the last vote. I vote Yes. There may be a point at...
I vote yes. I just wanted to confirm that previous votes on the subject will be voided by this one. So, everybody has to re-vote. Correct? Thanks, Randy...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
