Ken MacLeod <ken@...> wrote:

>> Ken MacLeod wrote: <http://www.egroups.com/message/rss-dev/1006>
>>> Am I close?
>> I find it a good summary.
> If this solves the immediate need, then the next step is to word it as
> specific changes to the spec, and propose those changes. I know this
> would be several tasks down on my list, so if anyone can pick it up
> (Eric, Aaron, anyone?), let us know when you start.

Before writing these up as spec changes, I'd like to see a poll and perhaps
even a vote on the issue. I was under the impression that there might be
some resistance to the change, which is why I planned on saving it to 1.1.
However, it seems to be a somewhat important issue, which is relatively
unclear in the current spec, and so we need to pick at least _some_ sort of
resolution.

Second for a poll?

--
[ Aaron Swartz | me@... | http://www.aaronsw.com ]