--- In rss-dev@y..., Dan Brickley <daniel.brickley@b...> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Chris Croome wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sat 07-Sep-2002 at 03:54:28PM -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:
> > >
> > > But all the time RSS feeds want to have a meaningful default
> > > ordering (which will often _not_ be the same as that you'd get
> > > from ordering on date of item), I want to be able to get this
from
> > > the rdf:Seq too.
> >
> > I agree, but what about getting the order from rdf:List as per
Sean
> > Palmers suggestion?
>
> That'd be possible, though I think this group could better spend
its time
> working on tools, tips and guidelines than on changing the spec
again.
> Maybe put rdf:List on the wishlist, and wait until the next set of
W3C RDF
> specs are finalised before spending RSS-DEV time on it?
>
> Dan
>
>
> --
> mailto:danbri@w...
> http://www.w3.org/People/DanBri/

I rather thought that the RDF syntax was more or less stable, Dan.
Something about stack in the dirt, along those lines.

Saying to the group, focus on tools, tips, and guidelines -- what
about the RSS community, the two initiatives, the process of
simplifying the model, a move to promote this group's effort, get buy
in from other tool makers, and so on?

Tools, tips, and guidelines? Really? Hmmm

Shelley