--- In rss-dev@yahoogroups.com, "Jairus Pryor" <jairus@...> wrote:
>
> --- In rss-dev@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Kearney" <ml2_yahoo@> wrote:
> >
> > > ...so if I were to create an RSS 1.0 fork and/or modification
> >
> > Fork? Good Lord, why?
>
> Masochism, mostly.

Heh.

> That, and a need to syndicate fairly specialized statistical data to
> modified tools that already speak RSS. (Fork is a strong word,
> actually. Extension is much more accurate.)

That's why RSS 1.1 has had such great longevity. It's very easy to
create extensions that fit into the framework. Now, if you want to
create one that's fully RDF-savvy it can get a bit more complex.

So, care to discuss what sort of data you're planning to integrate?
There might be folks here with some suggestions/experience to offer on
how to effectively get it all working.

-Bill Kearney
Syndic8.com