> That's why RSS 1.1 has had such great longevity. It's very easy to
> create extensions that fit into the framework. Now, if you want to
> create one that's fully RDF-savvy it can get a bit more complex.
>
RSS 1.1 ?? Is that regarded as a viable format (I have not followed
this list for very long so I was not even aware of RSS 1.1)? Is it
widely supported? (Perhaps this was intended to be ironic & flew past
me??)

-Peter Keane
daseproject.org

> So, care to discuss what sort of data you're planning to integrate?
> There might be folks here with some suggestions/experience to offer on
> how to effectively get it all working.
>
> -Bill Kearney
> Syndic8.com
>