Hi, There's been mention of RDDL a few times on this list (mainly wrt to spec/module documentation). I've written an RDDL tutorial [1] which might prove...
1638
David Megginson
david@...
Mar 1, 2001 6:17 pm
... I think this is a good suggestion. I didn't follow the RDDL development on XML-Dev, but I gave the spec a thorough read during my flight to New York...
1639
Sean B. Palmer
sean@...
Mar 1, 2001 8:35 pm
... Sounds good to me. It'd be nice if parsers could start to accept RDDL where appropriate... but because it can encompass almost any form of schemata or...
1640
Eric van der Vlist
vdv@...
Mar 1, 2001 8:47 pm
... The taxo module has been written as RDDL :) ... Eric -- See you in Austin (Knowledge Technologies 2001) ...
1641
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Mar 2, 2001 9:31 pm
In accordance with our procedures, the content module has been voted an official module. The vote is at: http://logicerror.com/rss-votes-content Should the...
1642
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Mar 2, 2001 9:47 pm
As RSS increases in popularity and utility, and as we begin to discover more RSS 1.0-related things, I feel that it becomes more important than ever to have a...
1643
rss-dev@yahoogroups.com
Mar 4, 2001 2:12 am
The following rss-dev poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: WG Vote on moving the taxonomy module to standard. See ...
1644
Edd Dumbill
edd@...
Mar 4, 2001 5:04 pm
For what it's worth, I think David really hits the mark with his ... The recent activity in this group seems to be consisting of at most 3 people voting here...
1645
Eric van der Vlist
vdv@...
Mar 4, 2001 7:44 pm
For the record (and for those of you who are not on xml-dev), I forward a recommandation from David Megginson worth thinking about ! Thanks David, Eric -- See...
1646
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Mar 4, 2001 8:10 pm
... I agree that David's comments should be considered and discussed here. However, I don't know if this is such a good idea. There _are_ requests for these...
1647
Ian Graham
ian.graham@...
Mar 4, 2001 9:54 pm
... OF course experimenting with a new module is different from adding a new module to the specification. It might be reasonable to set a developer ...
1648
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Mar 4, 2001 10:05 pm
... But we do not add modules to the specification! We merely publish them as "standard";. The spec is not modified when a module is added, and clearly states...
1649
Dion Loy
dion@...
Mar 5, 2001 2:23 am
Sunday, March 04, 2001, 2:05:40 PM, you wrote: ... AS> But we do not add modules to the specification! We merely publish them as AS> "standard";. The spec is...
1650
Mike Gunderloy
MikeG1@...
Mar 5, 2001 2:33 am
I'll delurk here for a minute to say hi and perhaps contribute a bit to the discussion. I've been providing an RSS 0.91 feed from my weblog for a while now,...
1651
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Mar 5, 2001 2:35 am
... So another vote for a Candidate Rec-type phase, and another complaint about lack of implementers. ... Awesome! With RSS 1.0 support, right? That rocks! ......
1652
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Mar 5, 2001 2:38 am
... Could you send me the URL to the feed offlist? ... I don't think there is, and IMHO it's a tool that's sorely needed. Please let us know when it comes out...
1653
Mike Gunderloy
MikeG1@...
Mar 5, 2001 2:49 am
Whenever I've got something with even half-assed functionality I'll post a pointer here, and let folks tell me what it should REALLY do :) Mike Gunderloy ... ...
1654
David Megginson
david@...
Mar 5, 2001 3:33 am
... Give them time. The core members of your group have finished solving only the specification problems for RSS 1.0 -- now you have to wait, patiently, and...
1655
Nick Lothian
nl@...
Mar 5, 2001 3:44 am
... "Anything RSS 1.0 related" isn't pure evil. Software, tools, documents, websites and feeds are great. Just no more specs!...
1656
David Megginson
david@...
Mar 5, 2001 11:42 am
... Right -- and specifically, no more specs from this group. There's nothing wrong with other parties publishing their own specs to work with RSS 1.0, since...
1657
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Mar 5, 2001 1:01 pm
... To clarify - No one is "limiting"; their use to RSS, we're merely providing an XML representation so that they can be included in RSS. They can still be...
1658
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Mar 5, 2001 1:10 pm
... Well seeing as I proposed this last week [1] I'm all for it! :) David Megginson [2], Eric [3] and Sean Palmer [4] were also for using RDDL as well. As we...
1659
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Mar 5, 2001 1:16 pm
... Now I think we ... One of the reasons (the main one?) to add modularization is to allow people to make extensions to RSS without having to get it...
1660
Eric van der Vlist
vdv@...
Mar 5, 2001 1:16 pm
... This is a tough question. On the other hand, if we end up with a number of different incompatible modules to do the same things, it will also be confusing....
1661
hpyle@...
Mar 5, 2001 4:13 pm
Hi folks, Coming a bit late to this, I can't find a succinct description of how the taxo module should be applied. Can anyone here enlighten me a little? ...
1662
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Mar 6, 2001 4:38 am
... It's to attach things (items, channels, topics) to categorizations. Here's my new quick-start guide on how to use it: ...
1663
jborden@...
Mar 6, 2001 5:46 am
... demonstrate ... Yes and my apologies for being tardy getting this up, but i've been working out a few natures and purposes to properly describe these sorts...
1664
hpyle@...
Mar 6, 2001 9:22 am
Thanks Aaron, that's exactly what I was looking for. One suggestion: the opening paragraph should explain *why* you'd want to do this (ie. to give aggregators...
1665
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Mar 6, 2001 9:24 am
I'm forwarding this message on request. I think we should revise the spec based on this advice. Its also good news with regards to the RELAX grammars....
1666
peteb@...
Mar 6, 2001 4:02 pm
Section 5.5. of RSS RC1 indicates "There may be a minimum of one and a maximum of fifteen items per RSS document." Why the min of 1 ? Scenario: Using channel...
