... Jeff Barr said earlier that he didn't want it the "syndic8" in there, so what about this modified version: <?generator agent="AmphetaDesk"; version="0.91"...
... And we slide down the slippery slope of specifying what other attributes are appropriate. The Mozilla team's work on version strings is what I've emulated...
And wouldn't we want to use dublin core qualifiers for the various field types? Name, email, contact, subject, keywords, etc, ad nauseum? Seriously, how...
... Not that I'm aware of. The last time around on this topic, we did make a module proposal: http://209.134.132.87/2001/05/mod_admin_draft.html This draft...
There's been some activity in the bug report for RSS support in Mozilla. See <URL: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66054 >, and feel free to add...
Hi all, So, after last week's thread, has there been a consensus on what format would be useful? The thread: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/2347...
... I would say no. The two formats have a rationale for representing their information as they do, for the tools that read them. Specific to "why not" XML...
2374
rss-dev@yahoogroups.com
Feb 8, 2002 2:30 am
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the rss-dev group. File :...
... I don't recall any suggestions to change or negative comments to the admin module proposal, so for RSS 1.0 feeds: xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" ...
I'm ready and able to support something like this in Syndic8, but we need to hear from the groups that (a) you are ok with the representation and (b) that you...
Is there any interest in submissing RSS1.0 to the IETF? I'm happy to do the work here if this group has the will. If so, there should be discussion of whether...
... Yes, I think that would be a great idea. ... There would at least need to be a reformatting to IETF format, which would include a new section or two...
Hi, ... I vote no. I don't quite see the point. Either we use RSS 1.0 and there's no point voting. Or we try and stay closer to RSS .91 and then I suggest we...
... My apologies for not checking the To: list and being clearer about what the poll applies to. The poll is for whether the RSS 1.0 Administration module is...
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the rss-dev group: Are you OK with the representation in the RSS 1.0 proposed module Administration...
... dev/files/Modules/Proposed/mod_admin.htm I'm not sure I like the ambiguity presented in this proposal. It's not clear why the description states RSS...
[splitting the issues into two threads] ... The relevant text: For general RDF usage, it is suggested that admin:errorReportsTo and admin:generatorAgent be...
... I followed the thread on possible metadata about generators, and agree wholeheartedly that it should exist -- somewhere :-) . The Admin proposal recommends...
... Hash: SHA1 ... <snip/> I am sorry... can I change my vote? Could the namespace be changed to something like http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/admin ?? Kevin ...
... Yes, you can change your vote at any time before the poll ends by revisiting: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/surveys?id=868633 and revote or cancel...
... The theory being a purl is 'more permanent'. The purl.org sites keep track of various URLs. You can use a purl server to redirect it's link to whatever...
2393
rss-dev@yahoogroups.com
Feb 16, 2002 2:21 pm
The following rss-dev poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Are you OK with the representation in the RSS 1.0 proposed module ...
