... The RDF Core draft doc I edit RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/ has contained a RELAXNG schema for the last 3...
4716
Joseph Reagle
decard13
Jan 3, 2003 3:01 pm
... A relaxNG schema can be found at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Sep/0164.html (The comments about trying to get something to work in...
4715
Jon Hanna
hack_poet
Jan 3, 2003 11:44 am
... Are you using this to validate arbitrary RSS input, or RSS coming from your own applications? An XML Schema for RSS would be very difficult if not...
4714
Eric van der Vlist
evlist
Jan 3, 2003 9:08 am
Hi, On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 09:54, Dr Noop <4yahoo-groups@...> ... There can't be any normative schema using W3C XML Schema (WXS) since the RSS 1.0...
4713
Dr Noop <4yahoo-gr...
drnoop
Jan 3, 2003 8:55 am
Hi! Where is RSS Schema? I need a root Schema with this namespace: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema Thank's...
4712
Dave Beckett
dj_beckett
Jan 2, 2003 8:14 pm
... It is in the current rdf/xml working draft. The Status section at the top pointed at it: [[some non-namespaced attributes were returned to the grammar...
4711
Bill Kearney
wkearney99
Jan 2, 2003 2:49 pm
Correct, and in RDF your example would end up being layered into a "flattened" item: <item rdf:about="http://example.com"> <title>Example title</title> ...
4710
Bill Kearney
wkearney99
Jan 2, 2003 2:37 pm
... As long as you're not making the same item assertion is there a problem? It does lead to issues of properly handling multiple elements (more than one ...
4709
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 2:29 pm
... I agree. ... I think that this is the intention of the spec. But it's an artifact of treating the RSS as simple XML. If it was being processed as RDF then...
4708
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 2:24 pm
... It's both. I'm making two different sets of assertions about the same URI. - Ian <iand@...> "Chance favors only the prepared mind."...
4707
Bill Kearney
wkearney99
Jan 2, 2003 2:15 pm
... I doubt that's the real intention of the spec. Is it more that the rdf:about isn't supposed to be used on another rss:item? That way one would avoid more...
4706
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 2:06 pm
... The actual wording in the spec is: "The {resource} URL of the channel element's rdf:about attribute must be unique with respect to any other rdf:about...
4705
Ben Hammersley <be...
bhammersley_uk
Jan 2, 2003 1:52 pm
... it a link or a ... perma-link to the ... a non-issue ... destination ... I can summarise, I think: The rdf:about attribute of <item> should be the URI of...
4704
Jon Hanna
hack_poet
Jan 2, 2003 1:47 pm
... I'm pretty sure the decision was in one of the published WG minutes. It could take a while to actually end up in the draft. Requiring that both must be...
4703
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 1:38 pm
... I know we discussed this recently. Did anyone produce a summary of the issues and positions? If not, I'll see if I can knock one together. - Ian...
4702
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 1:35 pm
... My only argument is the old Jon Postel Robustness Principle [1] "...be conservative in what you send". Using rdf:resource is, and will be, unambiguous. I...
4701
Bill Kearney
wkearney99
Jan 2, 2003 1:28 pm
... The two items /are/ about the site, correct? This is the old is it a link or a perma-link argument. I still see the rdf:about URI being the perma-link to...
4700
Jon Hanna
hack_poet
Jan 2, 2003 1:21 pm
... Yes, otherwise you risk coherent and open discussion....
4699
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 1:20 pm
... Is that the done thing these days? I'm so old fashioned ;) - Ian <iand@...> "Chance favors only the prepared mind."...
4698
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 1:19 pm
... Agreed. - Ian <iand@...> "Minds are like books - they work best when open"...
4697
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 1:17 pm
... Here's a contrived example: I write about a new website being launched at http://example.com. Two months later I write again that the site has been...
4696
Jon Hanna
hack_poet
Jan 2, 2003 1:10 pm
... Apart from the security and accessibility issues, it's a bugger to code for, unless you pass it all to a browser to deal with. I don't like the idea that ...
4695
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 1:06 pm
... OK, either you do two passes or you have two copies in memory. Putting the items first doesn't change the process. Suppose I'm using SAX to convert from...
4694
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 12:56 pm
... This is a very good idea. Http is the only MUST as far as I'm concerned. I don't want to jump the gun and label JavaScript as MUST NOT though. It's...
4693
Bill Kearney
wkearney99
Jan 2, 2003 12:53 pm
... NO! You don't have to create them in two different passes! Create them /in memory/ together and then write them to disk. Or create a placeholder in the ...
4692
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 12:48 pm
... I'm a huge fan of the typed-node syntax and would strongly encourage any RDF specs to promote it. My point in the issue was that I think it is overly...
4691
Ian Davis
ianalchemy
Jan 2, 2003 12:36 pm
I've split my replies to make it easier to respond to individual points. ... If the allowable RDF were not constrained by the spec it would be possible to...
4690
Bill Kearney
wkearney99
Jan 2, 2003 12:20 pm
... I disagree. If, for example, one provided a *feed document* with more than one channel in it how would you know which items belong to which channel? Not...
4689
Jon Hanna
hack_poet
Jan 2, 2003 11:59 am
... I agree. This restriction limits the use of some modules considerably (DC in particular - in most other use cases duplicate elements are common) and bans ...
4688
Luka Sherron
blogginslut
Jan 1, 2003 8:20 am
I meant to post the resolution by forwarding an email but i didn't post. well, i contacted the voidstar.com person they actually responded and fixed the...
