Note: forwarded message attached. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
7386
vdv
evlist
Aug 28, 2006 10:15 am
... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
7387
tsmpereira
Oct 16, 2006 5:00 pm
Hi, I can not access to the specification of the RSS 1.0. It is only possible to access to the modules. Last week I did access to the spec but today it only...
7388
Mumia W.
mumia.w.18.spam+nospa...
Oct 17, 2006 2:24 pm
... The site you posted, http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/spec , works for me. It also links to this site: http://purl.org/rss/1.0/spec Perhaps your proxy or...
7389
rcade
Dec 12, 2006 4:40 am
The existence of two similar but incompatible formats that call themselves RSS is a persistent problem for everyone who supports these formats, whether they're...
7390
Bill Kearney
wkearney99
Dec 12, 2006 4:51 am
... Yes you are, and no there's not....
7391
Jon Hanna
hack_poet
Dec 12, 2006 3:12 pm
RDF Site Summary-RDF? RDF, so good they named it twice? :)...
7392
rcade
Dec 12, 2006 4:31 pm
... I've pinged RSS 1.0's authors along with several of the working group members who joined afterward. RSS 1.0 would do better, marketing wise, under the name...
7393
Alan Dean
alan_james_dean
Dec 12, 2006 4:35 pm
... How about "RDF-Syndication"? Alan Dean...
7394
rcade
Dec 12, 2006 4:37 pm
... I was thinking more along the lines of RSS for the Resource Description Framework (RSS-RDF), but I'm enough of a dork to appreciate a recursive acronym...
7395
gary.berosik@...
glberosik55075
Dec 12, 2006 5:03 pm
If renaming becomes a reality, I would suggest that the new name should NOT have an embedded dash in the name (e.g., RSSRDF, RSSrdf or rssrdf instead of...
7396
Bill Kearney
wkearney99
Dec 13, 2006 3:30 pm
... Ah yeah, right. Let's see, one format comes up with a name, then some jackass hijacks it by playing version number games. Then it becomes the ...
7397
rcade
Dec 14, 2006 12:24 am
... I'm not suggesting that the RSS-DEV Working Group is obligated to change the name of RSS 1.0 because of confusion with RSS 2.0. I'm suggesting that RSS 1.0...
7398
rcade
Dec 14, 2006 12:28 am
... I have a longer reply in Yahoo Groups limbo. In case it doesn't make it, here's the short version: The RSS-DEV Working Group has no responsibility to...
7399
Eric van der Vlist
evlist
Dec 16, 2006 8:41 am
Hi, Le mardi 12 décembre 2006 à 03:32 +0000, rcade a écrit : ... As far as I remember, this poll reflects the mixed feelings that we had about changing our...
7400
rcade
Dec 18, 2006 4:34 pm
... Given the response to the RSS 1.1 proposal here when it was pitched in January 2005, it appears that a successive version of RSS 1.0 is highly unlikely. I...
7401
Bill Kearney
wkearney99
Dec 18, 2006 5:44 pm
That *you're* not getting traction doesn't equate with much. You're pushing an agenda that isn't in keeping with what the effort thus far has desired. An...
7402
Eric van der Vlist
evlist
Dec 18, 2006 6:28 pm
... A lot of them have changed their email addresses. Have you got more recent addresses than those on the spec? ... There is still hope: you've succeeded to...
7403
rcade
Dec 18, 2006 7:17 pm
... I went looking for more recent addresses, and was successful for all but a few authors. There's only one I didn't contact intentionally, because I ran into...
7404
rcade
Dec 18, 2006 7:21 pm
... We (you, me, Jon Hanna and Randy Charles Morin) didn't get much traction with the joint RSS MIME type proposal here either. It also seemed like the RSS 1.1...
7405
Bill Kearney
wkearney99
Dec 18, 2006 7:46 pm
... I'm not sure it's worth rehashing again. ... Bingo. ... I don't share that assumption. ... So that's, what, a threat? Gee, how unlike the 2.0 hijacking...
7406
rcade
Dec 19, 2006 2:37 am
... Calling it a threat presumes that withholding my future proposals would be some form of punishment to the working group. As I said, it's just where I'm at...
7407
John Breslin
jgbreslin
Dec 22, 2006 4:41 pm
Surely you mean RDFSS Jon? :) ... Subject: Re: [RSS-DEV] Renaming RSS 1.0 as RSS-RDF Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:04:29 +0000 From: Jon Hanna...
7408
Hammond, Tony
thammond_2004
Jan 25, 2007 2:43 pm
Hi: Am looking for some feedback on an approach we are looking at to upgrade our current RSS feeds (RSS 1.0) to a wider (and neutral) offering (RSS 1.0, RSS ...
7409
James Holderness
james_holder...
Jan 25, 2007 4:54 pm
... One major problem is that Atom doesn't allow multiple content elements per item. I suppose you could put the XHTML in a summary element and leave the RDF...
7410
Hammond, Tony
thammond_2004
Jan 26, 2007 11:26 pm
Thanks, James. Gosh, I¹ve got a big red face now. I hadn¹t realized that Atom had a one content element only per entry restriction. (Was thinking that it had...
7411
Mario
tcblues56
Feb 18, 2007 3:15 pm
Hello: I'm looking for a RSS/Atom Aggregator for ASP.NET. Somebody knows anything about this? Thank you....
7412
William Lefkovics
wlefkovics
Feb 18, 2007 4:56 pm
There was a sample or two of this in MSDN. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa478968.aspx http://www.rssbandit.org/ _____ From: rss-dev@yahoogroups.com...
7413
maniscript
Mar 5, 2007 11:34 pm
Is there a list of translation for RSS 1.0? Is there a french translation?...
7414
karlos_napfos
Mar 6, 2007 2:00 pm
Hello, Line 6 of http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/ contains an error: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../../style.css" //> (the...
