Hi, I can not access to the specification of the RSS 1.0. It is only possible to access to the modules. Last week I did access to the spec but today it only...
... The site you posted, http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/spec , works for me. It also links to this site: http://purl.org/rss/1.0/spec Perhaps your proxy or...
Mumia W.
mumia.w.18.spam+nospa...
Oct 17, 2006 2:24 pm
7389
The existence of two similar but incompatible formats that call themselves RSS is a persistent problem for everyone who supports these formats, whether they're...
... I've pinged RSS 1.0's authors along with several of the working group members who joined afterward. RSS 1.0 would do better, marketing wise, under the name...
... I was thinking more along the lines of RSS for the Resource Description Framework (RSS-RDF), but I'm enough of a dork to appreciate a recursive acronym...
If renaming becomes a reality, I would suggest that the new name should NOT have an embedded dash in the name (e.g., RSSRDF, RSSrdf or rssrdf instead of...
... I'm not suggesting that the RSS-DEV Working Group is obligated to change the name of RSS 1.0 because of confusion with RSS 2.0. I'm suggesting that RSS 1.0...
... I have a longer reply in Yahoo Groups limbo. In case it doesn't make it, here's the short version: The RSS-DEV Working Group has no responsibility to...
Hi, Le mardi 12 décembre 2006 à 03:32 +0000, rcade a écrit : ... As far as I remember, this poll reflects the mixed feelings that we had about changing our...
... Given the response to the RSS 1.1 proposal here when it was pitched in January 2005, it appears that a successive version of RSS 1.0 is highly unlikely. I...
That *you're* not getting traction doesn't equate with much. You're pushing an agenda that isn't in keeping with what the effort thus far has desired. An...
... A lot of them have changed their email addresses. Have you got more recent addresses than those on the spec? ... There is still hope: you've succeeded to...
... I went looking for more recent addresses, and was successful for all but a few authors. There's only one I didn't contact intentionally, because I ran into...
... We (you, me, Jon Hanna and Randy Charles Morin) didn't get much traction with the joint RSS MIME type proposal here either. It also seemed like the RSS 1.1...
... I'm not sure it's worth rehashing again. ... Bingo. ... I don't share that assumption. ... So that's, what, a threat? Gee, how unlike the 2.0 hijacking...
... Calling it a threat presumes that withholding my future proposals would be some form of punishment to the working group. As I said, it's just where I'm at...
Hi: Am looking for some feedback on an approach we are looking at to upgrade our current RSS feeds (RSS 1.0) to a wider (and neutral) offering (RSS 1.0, RSS ...
... One major problem is that Atom doesn't allow multiple content elements per item. I suppose you could put the XHTML in a summary element and leave the RDF...
Thanks, James. Gosh, I¹ve got a big red face now. I hadn¹t realized that Atom had a one content element only per entry restriction. (Was thinking that it had...
There was a sample or two of this in MSDN. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa478968.aspx http://www.rssbandit.org/ _____ From: rss-dev@yahoogroups.com...
Hello, Line 6 of http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/ contains an error: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../../style.css" //> (the...
To All I am hoping for discussion about RSS 1.0 and extending using Modules and have needed one for some time. However, the focus of this group has been on...
To All I am hoping for discussion about RSS 1.0 and extending using Modules and have needed one for some time. However, the focus of this group has been on...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
