This is exactly what I was afraid of. Please treat these as warnings,
not errors. The schema attribute is harmless.
Thanks,

Randy Charles Morin
http://www.kbcafe.com/rss


--- In rss-public@yahoogroups.com, "rcade" <cadenhead@...> wrote:
>
> I updated the RSS profile to reflect the spec's rule against extending
> core RSS elements with attributes in a namespace.
>
> The Introduction section now includes this sentence:
>
> "The elements defined in the specification MUST NOT be extended by
> attributes defined in a namespace."
>
> http://www.rssboard.org/rss-profile#introduction
>
> The RSS 2.0 specification includes an Extending RSS section that
> describes how the format can be extended by namespaces:
>
> http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification#extendingRss
>
> "RSS originated in 1999, and has strived to be a simple, easy to
> understand format, with relatively modest goals. After it became a
> popular format, developers wanted to extend it using modules defined
> in namespaces, as specified by the W3C.
>
> "RSS 2.0 adds that capability, following a simple rule. A RSS feed may
> contain elements not described on this page, only if those elements
> are defined in a namespace."
>
> Because this language mentions elements and excludes attributes, the
> simplest read of the spec is that core elements cannot contain
> namespaced attributes.
>
> For those who are new to this list, the RSS Profile is a set of best
> practices for RSS we've been working on since March. New drafts are
> published for public comment -- if you agree or disagree with a
> revision, please let us know here on RSS-Public.
>