If we call this an error, I'll propose a change to the spec to allow
extension attribute. Please try and be civil instead of trying to
create an issue. This is an obvious compromise.
Thanks,

Randy Charles Morin
http://www.kbcafe.com/rss

--- In rss-public@yahoogroups.com, Sam Ruby <rubys@...> wrote:
>
> Randy Morin wrote:
> > This is exactly what I was afraid of. Please treat these as warnings,
> > not errors. The schema attribute is harmless.
>
> From a coding perspective, the difference between coding a check for a
> warning and coding a check for an error is inconsequential.
>
> I'll hold off for a few days, but in the end, I would rather code to
> what the profile actually says, and not based on input I see in an
> individual email or weblog posting.
>
> While I would agree that the schema attribute is relatively harmless,
> "The spec, on the other hand, if read literally, is clear on the
matter."
>
> - Sam Ruby
>