draft-1 says of the rss element "This element is required and must contain only one child: a channel element." which strikes me as eminently reasonable, and...
Is it worth a few more words in draft-1 to make it clear that the <day> in <skipDays> is a UTC/GMT day, and that if you are a publisher in GMT-08:00, your...
... Corrected, thanks. Here's the revised rss section: This element is REQUIRED and MUST contain one child element: a channel element. The rss element MUST NOT...
... Going all the way back to Netscape 0.91, I can't find a spec that indicates the timezone to use for <day>. Because skipDays and skipHours have been...
An e-mailer asked of the spec language "The channel may contain each of the following optional elements ..." this question: "One each? (In other words, can you...
... The Feed Validator will flag duplicate cloud elements. I've heard no complaints. It would be nice if the question of how many <enclosure> elements are ...
... I haven't implemented skipDays (or skipHours for that matter) so this isn't really an answer to your question, but you may be interested to know my ...
... I found Dave's take from some previous discussion, probably <enclosure>, completely persuasive: the only sane way to interpret having some elements which...
... Hopefully the goal of the proposed replacement is that such inferences are not necessary. In the proposed draft, it is exliclitly mentioned that...
... That's true. Aggregators are not forbidden from requesting the document during the times identified by skipDays and skipHours, by my read of the specs. The...
... CDATA sections are part of the XML specification and since an RSS document MUST conform to that specification I would assume CDATA sections MUST be valid...
... XML grammars (like RSS 2.0) are subsets of well-formed XML. If SOAP can disallow DOCTYPEs, then RSS *could* disallow CDATA. Note: I'm not suggesting...
Just yesterday, somebody figured out how craft a trackback in such a way as to cause my comments feed to become invalid. I quickly fixed the problem, but I...
... FYI, I did a bit of testing on RSS relative references a while back to see how various aggregators handled the situation. Of the 15 I tested, 1 failed ...
This is likely an area where we can clear up the spec. We have several options, of which two are... -Specify the handling of these elements more precisely. ...
Here's Dave's thoughts on the issue... http://archive.scripting.com/2004/12/21#multipleenclosuresOnRssItems ...which align with Phil's and I agree with y'all....
... You agree to what? The original intended meaning of the spec, or that the proposed revision could make this clearer? Hopefully both, as the fact that it...
... First, kudos for being willing to at least vocalize the tough decisions that need to be made. Proposal: a change is made to the Feed Validator to flag the...
The new spec should specify exact cardinality and it should be zero or one for the channel and item optional elements that are not specifically referred to in...
Sam, Do you already have extended help pages in the FeedValidator for <skipX>? If so, then would you mind sharing how many pageviews you get? Thanks, Randy...
... The Feed Validator only has extended help pages for conditions that involve warnings or errors. Three such messages are specific to SkipHours and/or...
The history of HTML markup in Really Simple Syndication: * 0.91 (Netscape): "We ... are not allowing any HTML markup beyond the commonly used entities such as...
Just a clarification. <content:encoded> could include HTML. So could <xhtml:body>. Better wording might be... RSS elements, other than item description and RSS...
... I agree that's probably the most accurate way of interpreting the spec, however it's worth considering the following quote from Wikipedia: "Userland's RSS...
... The key words in that sentence are "defined in the RSS 0.91 DTD". See below. ... The question as to whether or not a given element in an RSS document can ...
... Is it your belief that an author of an RSS document must be able to express the content type of an element's character data (text or HTML) for aggregators...
... Not at all. From http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/05/28/detente If the spec were to be updated to merely say how various textual elements SHOULD be...
... Not at all. From http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/05/28/detente If the spec were to be updated to merely say how various textual elements SHOULD be...
