DeWitt Clinton: But what if you wanted to put something interesting inside a syndicated content feed? What if you wanted to put valid XHTML in a feed? You went...
Aristotle, Are you implying that we shouldn't bother trying? I think we should. Hopefully, the rest of the RSS Advisory Board is on the same page. Thanks, ...
Hi Randy, ... not at all! Sorry if I gave that impression. I was reacting to ... I meant that I doubt you will ever be able to say that RSS2 is on par with...
... Personally, I would love to see RSS fully support XHTML. Since the spec is frozen, I'm curious as to how this would be accomplished in the profile. Does...
Yes, my understanding is that the profile would recommend extensions. This simply hasn't happened yet. Thanks, Randy Charles Morin http://www.kbcafe.com/rss ...
... Yeah, me too. ... A good start would be to get the current board members to support it or at least commit to supporting it in their products. So far it...
... Woops, yeah. I was looking at them in an app that unescaped them automagically. Thanks for catching that. -- Mark Woodman http://markwoodman.com...
... Thinking over this again, I'm not sure that it matters. If you want to include xhtml:body in a feed as Randy is suggesting you're still going to be ...
... In around 10 days I'm going to begin a final 30-day push to finish the first version of the RSS Profile and propose it to the board. If it is approved,...
James, Agreed, the recommendation should be to use xhtml:body in addition to description, not instead. Thanks, Randy Charles Morin http://www.kbcafe.com/rss ...
Rogers, I personally, would rather go with xhtml:body, as many aggregators already support it. Whereas atom:content would be something entirely new. MHO, Randy...
... going to be ... compatibility. So ... still be ... An issue with this thinking is that RSS implementors don't have an order of precedence when several...
Rogers, If we limit inclusion to stable XML vocabularies and avoid volatile ones, then we should never have this problem. I doubt xhtml:body, content:encoded...
... By that criterion, the IETF-ratified Atom 1.0 is the strongest candidate for namespaced extensions: it’s never ever going to change. SCNR :), -- ...
... I think great care should be taken to pick extensions for mention in the profile. The overarching, all-consuming goal at this point is interoperability....
Point of information ... I thought that one could legitimitely embed CDATA sections in RSS feeds. XHTML can go in CDATA sections, can it not? Aggregators...
... Double-escaping and CDATA sections are one and the same. Both are opaque string blobs as far as the XML parser is concerned. Double-escaped XHTML data is a...
Yeah, I'm with Randy on this. Last time I checked I found 9 aggregators that supported xhtml:body in some form or other, but only one that supported ...
... content:encoded was designed for RSS 1.0. xhtml:body was designed for XHTML. atom:content was designed for Atom. None of them are likely to ever describe...
... At FeedBurner, we have an informal precedence based upon the body of feeds that we've seen. Basically, if an item has both content:encoded and description,...
Hello, Thank you everybody ! I'm Filipe and I would like understand how i must use rss, feeds and things to help my "datavalorizar" for the New Economy 4G3W. ...
Dear community, In order to complete my Diploma thesis I am desperately searching for statistics about the market share of Web feed formats, i.e. how many Web...
Does anybody here have any opinion on this? http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=21715201&forum_id=37467 Bonus points for opinions that are...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
