Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

sacredlandscapelist · Archaeoastronomy, sacred geometry, more!

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 5800 - 5829 of 7668   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#5800 From: Ambrose Hawk <ahawk@...>
Date: Mon Jan 2, 2006 2:19 am
Subject: squeaky machines ...
AmbroseHawk
Send Email Send Email
 
The review on Supernatural: Meetings with the Ancient Teachers of
Mankind by Graham Hancock included this old bromide:  Before this,
humankind had no  art, no religion, and no creative thinking to speak
of. Yet the abilities and  concerns we associate with "being human"
seemed to appear - in archaeological  terms - overnight.
----
Once again, absence of evidence is not proof of absence of being ....
the fact that such items finally happened to occur in a manner and a
locale in which they were accidentally preserved should indicate that
they had developed prior to the event in some way.  How many little
bodies do you find while walking through the woods ... does this mean
there are no squirrels, moles, birds, etc. floundering through the fauna
with you?
Bottom line, we don't know what was going on before, just that it was
definitely going on by the time its observed ...
:)
Ambrose


--
IN HOC MODO MILLIS FRANGITVR .

#5801 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Mon Jan 2, 2006 4:35 am
Subject: Re: [sl] squeaky machines ...
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 
Absolutely right Ambrose.  Its never hard to pull Hancock up on points of detail of this kind.  Though he's often worth reading for leads and ideas he's not a scholar and _always_ needs checking.  When I said 'our old friend' my tongue was in my cheek.  He is indeed a 'squeaky machine' : )
 
To be fair however this was a review - not the author speaking, and the reviewer nay have been summarising carelessly. 
 
I recall, though I can't locate the details, a much older african paleolithic society - up to 2 million years old, pre-homo-sapiens; who made black stone tools of a superb standard.  Does that ring bells for anyone?
 
http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/  seems a good starting point for rock art; but if anyone can supply leads to better sources of information on early toolmaking that could supply us with good sketches of mankind's beginnings it would be nice. 
 
Mike. 
 
In a message dated 1/2/06 2:19:39 AM GMT Standard Time, ahawk@... writes:
The review on Supernatural: Meetings with the Ancient Teachers of
Mankind by Graham Hancock included this old bromide:  Before this,
humankind had no  art, no religion, and no creative thinking to speak
of. Yet the abilities and  concerns we associate with "being human"
seemed to appear - in archaeological  terms - overnight.
----
Once again, absence of evidence is not proof of absence of being ....
the fact that such items finally happened to occur in a manner and a
locale in which they were accidentally preserved should indicate that
they had developed prior to the event in some way.  How many little
bodies do you find while walking through the woods ... does this mean
there are no squirrels, moles, birds, etc. floundering through the fauna
with you?
Bottom line, we don't know what was going on before, just that it was
definitely going on by the time its observed ...
:)
Ambrose


--
IN HOC MODO MILLIS FRANGITVR .
 

#5802 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Mon Jan 2, 2006 5:25 am
Subject: Re: [sl] Re: submitting the infinite to rational analysis
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 
In a message dated 12/31/05 7:18:40 PM GMT Standard Time, ahawk@... writes:
Mike asked:
What objections might there  have been, and might remain, to "
submitting the infinite to rational  analysis."
---
The primary objection is that in analyzing the infinite from a finite
and apparently necessarily flawed perspective must always introduce a
massive amount of idiocies ... G.I.G.O.  Bluntly, "rational" is an ideal
which is all too illusory in practice.
Somebody (alas, not me) once put it this way:  Humans are not a rational
but rather a rationalizing species.

Me, I don't trust machines or ghosts ... but I think we need both as
well as something else to watch over and moderate them
LOL
Ambrose

--
IN HOC MODO MILLIS FRANGITVR .
It is, in my view, a trick question.  I don't know what the book has to say, but I think we're talking about two different 'infinites'. 
 
1    Mathematicians are interested in mathematical conceptions of infinity, how to handle mathematical tasks that require 'infinite analysis' etc. 
 
2    Godly types tend - for a variety of reasons - to define their god as infinite  (interestingly this means people like me and Saddam are included in God)
 
>Humans are not a rational but rather a rationalizing species.
 
I like that.  We might recognize too, as my masters might say, some participate in the rational more than others : )
 
December 30th saw the lastest sunrise; and so the birth of the New Year is not only complete, but well underway.  The snowdrops in my garden are shooting as I write.  May I wish you all, in your chosen landscape, the finest of years . 
 
Mike

#5803 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Mon Jan 2, 2006 2:07 pm
Subject: The Ethical Concerns of Scienctific Advances
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Gene,
 
I keep spotting odds and ends that bring to mind your points below on the issues surrounding science and ethics.  I think the way I wrote earlier might have been a result of my getting the wrong end of... the wrong stick.
 
I do agree that many new scientific advances require the input of some kind of ethical judgement, and that the scientists themselves are the wrong people to make them.  I think the question of who the people are is a tricky one.  In theory, in a democracy, we, the people should make them; and should do so through our legitimate agents, our governments.  But I think what sounds simple in theory turns out to be a whole lot harder in practise.
 
To begin with, different kinds of discoveries have different kinds of impacts - in both different areas and with different degrees of certainty and predictability.  We therefore need - if science is to continue - a first-line of expert judges to decide where and how to focus our attention.  We then need a secondary system that will provide space for voices from all the different interest groups and individuals.  Finally, we need a system of legislation to ensure their judgements are implemented into law.
 
This sounds like a huge lump of bureaucracy, with a whole load scientists and religious wallahs putting their oars in, and of lawyers making expensive arguments on behalf of the different groups that feel different things should steer policies.  It sounds like a job for a government body and/or government oversight (to provide legitimacy).  And it seems to me to be absolutely necessary - given the alternatives.
 
Its also pretty much what we have already.  So I guess all that's left to argue about is whether the system is working, and if not how to improve it.  I guess you'd like to argue for something close to the English system, where the House of Lords provides a second chamber containing, among others, a whole load of bishops who argue their end. 
 
To be honest while I have my doubts about our system, I'm not sure I'd want to see their Bishopnesses taken out of the equation - at least not without a good deal of thought going into the question of how their input is to be matched in the new system.
 
I though of all these while reading a report of an effort made by the web magazine, The Edge, on the ethical and moral dilemmas faced by society as a result of the blooming advances in the fields of biology and especially genetics.  A number of well - known voices contributed, including Steven Pinker, Ricard Dawkins, Craig Ventner, and the Royal Society (the top English body of scientific matters) Sir? Martin Rees, who says:
 
 
"... the most dangerous idea was public concern that science and technology were running out of control. "Almost any scientific discovery has a potential for evil as well as for good; its applications can be channelled either way, depending on our personal and political choices; we can't accept the benefits without also confronting the risks. The decisions that we make, individually and collectively, will determine whether the outcomes of 21st century sciences are benign or devastating."

Professor Rees argues that the feeling of fatalism will get in the way of properly regulating how science progresses. "The future will best be safeguarded - and science has the best chance of being applied optimally - through the efforts of people who are less fatalistic."

Full Guardian report - with some useful links at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/genes/article/0,,1676468,00.html
 
I think I agree with most of that. 
 
There's much food for thought here.  Chief in my mind is, these are not simple issues.  There's no simple solution.  But we do need a consensus - the 'commonly accepted ethical values' you speak of.   I think lots of discussion - often rather expensive discussion - is the only answer.
 
Best,
 
Mike
 
PS Be warned, next term I'm taking a course in Ethics... : )
 
 
In a message dated 12/29/05 6:08:38 PM GMT Standard Time, eugenemj@... writes:
Here I think we come to a fundamental question, namely, "can we find
a scientific basis for ethics.?"  In the past religion provided the
foundation for ethical behavior and human values, but now science
provides the dominate world-view.  Can humanity survive without
commonly accepted ethical values? 

Is the secular humanist position to just not do to others what you
don't want them to do to you and you will be accepted sufficient?
Isn't this a rather passive, spiritually dead, way of living?   If
the human being is not recognized as having any genuine spiritual
value then is there a moral, ethical problem of simply eliminating
old and defective people if it will make the lives of the remainder
better?  Doesn't this make rational sense?  If people are primarily
animals what does it really matter?  

If there is no scientific foundation for ethics then how can ethics
influence science?

Science itself is meaningful for certain kinds of questions but for
existential ones it seems silent.
 

#5804 From: "Eugene Johnson" <eugenemj@...>
Date: Tue Jan 3, 2006 3:58 am
Subject: Re: Straw Men
anthropik9
Send Email Send Email
 
--Hi Mike,

Straw men?  I think the points I have raised are more substantial
than that, particularly the issue of a balanced and controlled use of
science and technology.  I haven't seen any evidence to the contrary
that we, collectively, apparently must do whatever is scentifically
possible and technically feasible, no matter what the human cost.
This is not a very promising way to run a planet.  The problem, of
course, is the age old one of, "who is going to run the show"?

The Unabomber let his obsession with these problems unhinge his mind,
nevertheless, eventhough he was crazy, he did have a though
provoking  insight when he pointed out that it will be the
scientific/technical community that ultimately call the shots because
they will be the only ones who know and understand the "system" well
enough to do this.  But, even their expertize may be surpassed by the
capacity of self-replicating computers which will construct systems
of such complexity that surpass even the brightest among us to
master. In his scenario we will not be able to turn the 'system' off,
even though it is out of control, because we have become too
dependent on it.  A dire picture.

The proportion of the population that have training in science and
mathematics declines every year ( in the West I am sure ), a trend
that supports his assertion.

My argumant in this discusssion has been that only a rebirth of human
spiritual sensibilities will suffice to counter this drift toward a
society dominated by science/technology and restore some sense of
balance.  I am not against science, but I am for putting science in
its proper place and in right perspective.

When I brought up the medieval world-view I did so to contrast it
with the present unilevel view of science.  The medieval model, The
Great Chain of Being, in its basic form had three levels, Heavens,
Earth, Hells.  These correlate with the 'macro', 'meso' and 'micro-
worlds' of science except for the medieval these three worlds were an
integrated whole with spiritual as well as physical significance,
whereas from a scientific point of view, the macro realm of the
planets and the quantum micro world are all the same 'stuff'as the
terrestial, hence essentially the same as 'one level', with
meansurable physical properties, but no spiritual dimension.

The scientific 'world-view' is really no world view or model at all
because it has provides no dimensional structure ( from whence has
sprung the post modern philosophy of 'destructuralism' ) .The
medieval provided a model centered on the human plane with the higher
worlds ascribed with meaning and importance because they were
saturated with Divinity.

I am not so naive as to believe that the medieval period was a Golden
Age, it abounded in suffering of all kinds, but it did provide a
sustaining spiritual model for living which survived until the rise
of modern science.

Now the medieval understanding of physical reality was minimal and
largely incorrect with a world-view has been abolished, but, has 'the
baby been thrown our with the bathwater' to use a trite phrase?

Humanity, it appears, has throughout its sojourn on this planet, has
had its stories, myths and models of creation and man's place and
role in the cosmos. We seem to innately need that sort of thing.

A question now is can we live well without a such a model?

You may object that science does give us a model and what is wrong
with it?   Well, one big obstacle it that the language of science is
mathematics while the language of the laity is words.  If people
don't understand what the priesthood is saying how can they follow?
How can it mean anything?

Another point of objection is that a satisfying model of the cosmos
should give humanity a place in it. Without this how can meaningful
connections are relations be defined?

And then there is reductionism.  The problem with reductionism is
that it attempts to explain the greater in terms of the less ( of
course it one thinks that the notion of 'greater' and 'lesser' is
pure fiction, then there is no reductionism ).  The consequence is
that that the greater is diminished, and the lesser is
misunderstood.

In the medieval, or Hermetic view, the terrestial plane proceeds from
an intermediate plane and is defined by it, and the intermediate from
the celestial and the celestial from the Divine.

Huston Smith's, "Forgotten Truth - The Common Vision of the World's
Religions", is an enlightening read on the subject of science and
religion.  Europeans have suffered enormously from religious
persecutions and wars, but I don't believe the fault lies so much in
the intrinsic nature of religion as in the misinterpretation and mis
handleing of religion.

The book's Chapter Five, "The Place of Science" makes some thought
provoking parallels between science and religion:

They both claim : (1) Things are not as they seem
(2) The other-than-the-seeming is a "more"; indeed, a stupendous more
(3) This more cannot be known in ordinary ways
(4) It can however be known in ways appropiate to it
(5) the appropiate ways require cultivation
(6) And they require instruments....

Best regards,  Gene J

>
> Hi Gene
>
> I can agree with much that you say, and find sympathy too with some
of
> Berman's complaints - but say again - you (and he) attach the
wrong  target.  It is
> the pursuit of profit that has co-opted human experience and
imagination,
> wrapped in fairy dust and sold it back to us, killing the thing in
the process.
>
> you write:
> " In today's world money is
> king, indeed, it is practically our real  'god'. Science/Technology
> and Corporatism/Capitalism or 'joined at the  hip'.  Science, while
it
> likes to present itself as a high minded  'search for truth',
beyond
> the mundane quest for wealth and power, is in  fact, right in there
> with the rest of us jocking for the funding, grants,  and contracts
to
> be doled out by governments and corporations.   Universities which
in
> the past were devoted to the education of the whole  person and
> producing a graduate with genuine critical thinking skills has  now
> prostituted itself on the alter of money and power and  has lost
its
> voice of true authority,settleing for merely cranking out
> graduates  "with saleable skills".
>
> This is a picture of your country; the most religious of the first
world.
> It is not our (European) experience.  The blame for this state  of
affairs lies
> within your own political process - the weddedness of money to
political
> power; not to 'secular values'.
>
> That this is so can be seen as clear as day by making comparisoms
with
> European countries, with their advances systems of social care and
human  rights.
>
> Secular humanism recognises, and places centre-stage, the human
spirit.
> Capitalisim will capture, patent, and sell us both this and the
very air we
> breath if we let it.
>
> I understand many of your views and complaints to originate in the
> circumstances of your own culture - as does Berman, when he writes
of the death  of
> american culture.
>
> The thing I've be trying to say for some time here is - its not
like that
> over here.  Here we at least try to reject the worst of capitalism,
and
> moderate the remainder to serve the needs of humans.  The funny
thing is,  we are not
> religious - European secular social humanism seeks to nurture
(among  other
> things) the very things you complain are missing.  Science is its
handmaiden,
> its servant - not its master.  Capitalism likewise.   The world you
rail
> against is not a construct of science, nor of of  godlessness, but
is your very own
> increasingly fundamentalist  capitalist jungle.
>
> I've written at length on this issue in past months; but you seem
to be
> blind to the message.  Please re-read my posts and try to get  to
grips with my
> message - I am a humanist who values imagination,  freedom of
consciousness, the
> rights of mankind, the environment; who loves  learning, is
fascinated by the
> universe and by human achievement and  culture.  I'm not blind to
the dangers
> of 'scientism'.  I can  distiguish between good and bad science;
recognize
> that science is a tool which  like any other can be put to good use
or employed
> to do harm.
>
> "The 'scientific method' and 'peer review' are
> barren entities,however,  they can only say 'not this, 'not this',
and
> seldom produce anything."
>
> These are jaundiced words indeed.  You will reject scince and
replace  it
> with what?  A priesthood?  Speaking the words of God.  This  chills
me to the
> bone.  I've seen ideas like this a thousand time in the  history of
my continent.
>  This is America's - and the world's - number one  problem in One
Gene.
>
> "Here I think we come to a fundamental question, namely, "can we
find
> a  scientific basis for ethics.?"
>
> Why ask that question?  Who does?  I ask: Can we find a  humanistic
basis for
> ethics; and the answer is a resounding yes!
>
> "In the past religion provided the foundation for ethical behavior
and  human
> values, "
>
> Sometimes.  The humanistic outlook is ancient and venerable.  And
what a
> wonderful ethical entity that religious foundation was!  Do you
anything of the
> history of Christianity at all?
>
> "but now science provides the dominate world-view.
>
> You've slipped here from ethics to knowledge.  Science provides
the  dominant
> knowlege base, for sure.  But it doesn't control, and barely even
informs,
> ethics.  Democracies, better and worse, do.  People make the  the
laws.
>
> "Can humanity survive without commonly accepted ethical values?   "
>
> Yes and no - this is a complex question that does not benefit from
> simplistic approaches.  What would you include in ethics?  The
right  to pollute the
> air of the planet?  What people do in the privacy of their
bedrooms?  What is
> your focus here; from where would you have our ethics  guided?
>
> "Is the secular humanist position to just not do to others what
you
> don't want them to do to you and you will be accepted sufficient? "
>
> No.  While that is a component, it is only a small part.  The
European
> ethical model is a deeply considered and highly developed attempt
to  find a way
> for people of all beliefs to live together, and to find ways to
empower their
> creative spirits and seek to minimise their footprints on the
planet.
>
> "Isn't this a rather passive, spiritually dead, way of  living? "
>
> If that was the way secular humanists lived, it would be, but it
isn't.
>
> Killing foreigners by the hundreds of thousands so you can drive
your 4*4
> from one end of the country to the other on a whim for a few
dollars, while
> poisoning the air we all breathe - that I call spiritually dead.
Keeping blacks
> in a state of unrelieved poverty in order to provide an  underclass
to do the
> dirty work, and imprisoning them in rediculous numbers and  killing
them,
> those things I find spiritual dead.
>
> You complain of conditions made of political acts of will,  then
attack the
> very means by which you could master them.  Gene,  you continually
attack straw
> men.
>
> And you seem to believe in a golden age when religion provided
ethical and
> political guidance and everyone lived happily.  Could you please
provide me
> with just one thing: a date, and a place when this scenario held
sway?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
>

#5805 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Tue Jan 3, 2006 5:14 am
Subject: Re: [sl] Re: Straw Men
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 
In a message dated 1/3/06 3:59:29 AM GMT Standard Time, eugenemj@... writes:
"--Hi Mike,

Straw men?  I think the points I have raised are more substantial
than that, particularly the issue of a balanced and controlled use of
science and technology.  I haven't seen any evidence to the contrary
that we, collectively, apparently must do whatever is scentifically
possible and technically feasible, no matter what the human cost.
This is not a very promising way to run a planet.  The problem, of
course, is the age old one of, "who is going to run the show"?  "
 
My argumant in this discusssion has been that only a rebirth of human
spiritual sensibilities will suffice to counter this drift toward a
society dominated by science/technology and restore some sense of
balance.  I am not against science, but I am for putting science in
its proper place and in right perspective.
Hi Gene,
 
First, straw men; I think you (and Chris) misundersood me.  I'm saying that 'science' in itself is not the problem.  The misuse of scientific discoveries undoubtedly is.  To attack a 'science-that-causes-all-our-problems' is therefore to attack a target that doesn't exist - a 'straw man'. 
 
Science is merely a tool for separating truths from falsehoods, in those areas in which it can operate.  Just like a hammer it can be used to build or kill.  The hammer is not to blame for killing, and banning hammers isn't helpful.  (thought controlling their use may be) 
 
You must attack the misuse of the technologies that are harmful, rather than the science that undoutedly enabled them. 
 
Responding to the remainder of the paragraphs above, and the general issues raised below; my thoughts are - as you note above, that this is a political and not a scientific issue.  I think we agree that we are beings capable of making a huge mess, that that mess impacts of other humans and non-humans, (and of course ourselves) and that - as it stands - is an immoral situation.  We need to learn to control ourselves and our societies, and that means having the will to address questions of how we impact on others in both direct and indirect ways.
 
As democracies, this can only come about through the will of the people - so we have to:
 
a) change the people to make them want to put the rights and needs of others before our own comforts, _and_
 
b) change the power structures to make them more responsive to the new will of the people; or,
 
c) adopt non-democratic power structures that enforce such a program; or
 
d) other.
 
It seems to me - and I could be wrong here - that you advocate changing the people by injecting some spirituality into them?  Is this right?  I guess, what I'm saying here is, tell me more about yourself - we agree there's a problem, we are starting to agree the solution involves a decision-making process, but... we are you coming from.  What is your solution/what strategies would you employ.  What is the fix as you see it? 
 
 
My solution is to agree that we all have a shared interest, and a responsibility, to right these wrongs, and the the best way to find commonality of purpose is to set aside differences of a religious kind and find a common morality in righting the wrongs directly.  Attack misuse of science and technology as defined by negative outcome on a register defined by adverse impact on a mix of ecological and human targets.  That itself is will awaken a spirit of common interest, of care, cooperation and humanity.  At the same time we should adopt programmes that educate youngsters in ethical issues, centred on a realistic evaluation of the effects of self-interested behaviour. 
 
We should not attempt to reawaken religious approaches to morality for a whole range of reasons; starting with the fact that teaching 'revealed' truths is a falsehood, and, more prosaically it simply won't work in a multicultural world.  Focussing on common humanity sets a context that a) will operate from a basis of demonstrable truthfullness (impartial scientific appraisals of setting, problems and solution), and b) might actually work.
 
I'm saying that the issues are basically those of good or poor husbandry of the planet; and we will stand or fall by that measure.  That is the problem that must be attacked directly.  Resurrecting medieval ways of 'knowing' 'god' isn't going to help.  They were incorrect in every sense and remain so.  We have to stand to one side of ourselves and our self-interestedness, to see what the real problems are, and create the best possible solutions to fixing them - in a manner that is also ethically proper.  On these grounds, and these alone, can we find the commonality of purpose you rightly identify as necessary. 
 
The "rebirth of human spiritual sensibilities" you advocate must be non-denomenational - in every sense of the word... that is; humanism, secularism and atheism must be included, and denomenational inputs downgraded.  We must locate a non-religious 'spirituality of Man' that accepts that notions of 'divinity' are private matters of faith, and offer no grounds for shared beliefs or actions. 
 
Best,
Mike
 
 
...
The Unabomber let his obsession with these problems unhinge his mind,
nevertheless, eventhough he was crazy, he did have a though
provoking  insight when he pointed out that it will be the
scientific/technical community that ultimately call the shots because
they will be the only ones who know and understand the "system" well
enough to do this.  But, even their expertize may be surpassed by the
capacity of self-replicating computers which will construct systems
of such complexity that surpass even the brightest among us to
master. In his scenario we will not be able to turn the 'system' off,
even though it is out of control, because we have become too
dependent on it.  A dire picture.

The proportion of the population that have training in science and
mathematics declines every year ( in the West I am sure ), a trend
that supports his assertion. 

My argumant in this discusssion has been that only a rebirth of human
spiritual sensibilities will suffice to counter this drift toward a
society dominated by science/technology and restore some sense of
balance.  I am not against science, but I am for putting science in
its proper place and in right perspective.
  
When I brought up the medieval world-view I did so to contrast it
with the present unilevel view of science.  The medieval model, The
Great Chain of Being, in its basic form had three levels, Heavens,
Earth, Hells.  These correlate with the 'macro', 'meso' and 'micro-
worlds' of science except for the medieval these three worlds were an
integrated whole with spiritual as well as physical significance,
whereas from a scientific point of view, the macro realm of the
planets and the quantum micro world are all the same 'stuff'as the
terrestial, hence essentially the same as 'one level', with
meansurable physical properties, but no spiritual dimension. 

The scientific 'world-view' is really no world view or model at all
because it has provides no dimensional structure ( from whence has
sprung the post modern philosophy of 'destructuralism' ) .The
medieval provided a model centered on the human plane with the higher
worlds ascribed with meaning and importance because they were
saturated with Divinity. 

I am not so naive as to believe that the medieval period was a Golden
Age, it abounded in suffering of all kinds, but it did provide a
sustaining spiritual model for living which survived until the rise
of modern science.

Now the medieval understanding of physical reality was minimal and
largely incorrect with a world-view has been abolished, but, has 'the
baby been thrown our with the bathwater' to use a trite phrase? 

Humanity, it appears, has throughout its sojourn on this planet, has
had its stories, myths and models of creation and man's place and
role in the cosmos. We seem to innately need that sort of thing.

A question now is can we live well without a such a model? 

You may object that science does give us a model and what is wrong
with it?   Well, one big obstacle it that the language of science is
mathematics while the language of the laity is words.  If people
don't understand what the priesthood is saying how can they follow? 
How can it mean anything?

Another point of objection is that a satisfying model of the cosmos
should give humanity a place in it. Without this how can meaningful
connections are relations be defined? 

And then there is reductionism.  The problem with reductionism is
that it attempts to explain the greater in terms of the less ( of
course it one thinks that the notion of 'greater' and 'lesser' is
pure fiction, then there is no reductionism ).  The consequence is
that that the greater is diminished, and the lesser is
misunderstood. 

In the medieval, or Hermetic view, the terrestial plane proceeds from
an intermediate plane and is defined by it, and the intermediate from
the celestial and the celestial from the Divine.

Huston Smith's, "Forgotten Truth - The Common Vision of the World's
Religions", is an enlightening read on the subject of science and
religion.  Europeans have suffered enormously from religious
persecutions and wars, but I don't believe the fault lies so much in
the intrinsic nature of religion as in the misinterpretation and mis
handleing of religion.

The book's Chapter Five, "The Place of Science" makes some thought
provoking parallels between science and religion:

They both claim : (1) Things are not as they seem
(2) The other-than-the-seeming is a "more"; indeed, a stupendous more
(3) This more cannot be known in ordinary ways
(4) It can however be known in ways appropiate to it
(5) the appropiate ways require cultivation
(6) And they require instruments....

Best regards,  Gene J

>
> Hi Gene

> I can agree with much that you say, and find sympathy too with some
of 
> Berman's complaints - but say again - you (and he) attach the
wrong  target.  It is
> the pursuit of profit that has co-opted human experience and 
imagination,
> wrapped in fairy dust and sold it back to us, killing the thing in 
the process.

> you write:
> " In today's world money is
> king, indeed, it is practically our real  'god'. Science/Technology
> and Corporatism/Capitalism or 'joined at the  hip'.  Science, while
it
> likes to present itself as a high minded  'search for truth',
beyond
> the mundane quest for wealth and power, is in  fact, right in there
> with the rest of us jocking for the funding, grants,  and contracts
to
> be doled out by governments and corporations.   Universities which
in
> the past were devoted to the education of the whole  person and
> producing a graduate with genuine critical thinking skills has  now
> prostituted itself on the alter of money and power and  has lost 
its
> voice of true authority,settleing for merely cranking out
> graduates  "with saleable skills".
>
> This is a picture of your country; the most religious of the first 
world. 
> It is not our (European) experience.  The blame for this state  of
affairs lies
> within your own political process - the weddedness of money to 
political
> power; not to 'secular values'.  

> That this is so can be seen as clear as day by making comparisoms
with 
> European countries, with their advances systems of social care and
human  rights. 

> Secular humanism recognises, and places centre-stage, the human 
spirit. 
> Capitalisim will capture, patent, and sell us both this and the 
very air we
> breath if we let it.

> I understand many of your views and complaints to originate in the 
> circumstances of your own culture - as does Berman, when he writes
of the death  of
> american culture. 

> The thing I've be trying to say for some time here is - its not
like that 
> over here.  Here we at least try to reject the worst of capitalism,
and 
> moderate the remainder to serve the needs of humans.  The funny
thing is,  we are not
> religious - European secular social humanism seeks to nurture
(among  other
> things) the very things you complain are missing.  Science is its 
handmaiden,
> its servant - not its master.  Capitalism likewise.   The world you
rail
> against is not a construct of science, nor of of  godlessness, but
is your very own
> increasingly fundamentalist  capitalist jungle.

> I've written at length on this issue in past months; but you seem
to be 
> blind to the message.  Please re-read my posts and try to get  to
grips with my
> message - I am a humanist who values imagination,  freedom of
consciousness, the
> rights of mankind, the environment; who loves  learning, is
fascinated by the
> universe and by human achievement and  culture.  I'm not blind to
the dangers
> of 'scientism'.  I can  distiguish between good and bad science;
recognize
> that science is a tool which  like any other can be put to good use
or employed
> to do harm. 

> "The 'scientific method' and 'peer review' are
> barren entities,however,  they can only say 'not this, 'not this',
and
> seldom produce anything."

> These are jaundiced words indeed.  You will reject scince and
replace  it
> with what?  A priesthood?  Speaking the words of God.  This  chills
me to the
> bone.  I've seen ideas like this a thousand time in the  history of
my continent.
>  This is America's - and the world's - number one  problem in One
Gene.

> "Here I think we come to a fundamental question, namely, "can we
find
> a  scientific basis for ethics.?" 

> Why ask that question?  Who does?  I ask: Can we find a  humanistic
basis for
> ethics; and the answer is a resounding yes! 

> "In the past religion provided the foundation for ethical behavior
and  human
> values, "

> Sometimes.  The humanistic outlook is ancient and venerable.  And 
what a
> wonderful ethical entity that religious foundation was!  Do you 
anything of the
> history of Christianity at all? 

> "but now science provides the dominate world-view. 

> You've slipped here from ethics to knowledge.  Science provides
the  dominant
> knowlege base, for sure.  But it doesn't control, and barely even 
informs,
> ethics.  Democracies, better and worse, do.  People make the  the
laws. 

> "Can humanity survive without commonly accepted ethical values?   "

> Yes and no - this is a complex question that does not benefit from 
> simplistic approaches.  What would you include in ethics?  The
right  to pollute the
> air of the planet?  What people do in the privacy of their 
bedrooms?  What is
> your focus here; from where would you have our ethics  guided?

> "Is the secular humanist position to just not do to others what
you 
> don't want them to do to you and you will be accepted sufficient? "

> No.  While that is a component, it is only a small part.  The 
European
> ethical model is a deeply considered and highly developed attempt
to  find a way
> for people of all beliefs to live together, and to find ways to 
empower their
> creative spirits and seek to minimise their footprints on the 
planet.
>
> "Isn't this a rather passive, spiritually dead, way of  living? "

> If that was the way secular humanists lived, it would be, but it 
isn't. 

> Killing foreigners by the hundreds of thousands so you can drive
your 4*4 
> from one end of the country to the other on a whim for a few
dollars, while 
> poisoning the air we all breathe - that I call spiritually dead.  
Keeping blacks
> in a state of unrelieved poverty in order to provide an  underclass
to do the
> dirty work, and imprisoning them in rediculous numbers and  killing
them,
> those things I find spiritual dead.

> You complain of conditions made of political acts of will,  then
attack the
> very means by which you could master them.  Gene,  you continually
attack straw
> men. 

> And you seem to believe in a golden age when religion provided
ethical and 
> political guidance and everyone lived happily.  Could you please
provide me 
> with just one thing: a date, and a place when this scenario held
sway?

> Cheers,

> Mike
 

#5806 From: "Daniel N. Washburn" <danw@...>
Date: Tue Jan 3, 2006 2:07 pm
Subject: Book List: NeuroTheology
danw888
Send Email Send Email
 
Amazon NeuroTheology list
http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/listmania/fullview/1TGVU6C1FE9C6/104-9042791-66\
66329?%5Fencoding=UTF8

Neuropsychological Bases of God Beliefs.
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0275926486/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_1/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Michael A. Persinger
$70.95



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_0/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fen\
coding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=RGTSxzbmi2bbJnXEzd2qroqFNOq3oBdLX5N3GWqmL\
Xtcd8SykwYGPjsx6EI4uid7BKUFLacg%252FRY%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry\
&asin.0275926486=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0688172172/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_2/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

Phantoms in the Brain : Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0688172172/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_2/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by V. S. Ramachandran
$10.88   Used & New from: $5.00



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_1/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fen\
coding=UTF8&type=wishlist&asin.0688172172=1&offeringID.1=fEEGynRIYumNlTkbWdXsrdd\
hrXNVyRW3UmOe3ckbaHsJ%252Foh1xK3UGRFtGTkBYydIQIj31Kdz3CM%253D&submit.add-to-regi\
stry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0971644586/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_3/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

NeuroTheology: Brain, Science, Spirituality, Religious Experience
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0971644586/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_3/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Rhawn Joseph
$44.00   Used & New from: $37.00



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_2/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fen\
coding=UTF8&asin.0971644586=1&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=Nj3nkdTzYamzQ53yGGbiSGk\
iuHki6clcz66OMqF1BODLYjgKUocnYqiVrEZ%252F46%252BVqHx7c1sPcuk%253D&submit.add-to-\
registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/006251671X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_4/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

The Secret of the Soul : Using Out-of-Body Experiences to Understand Our
True Nature
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/006251671X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_4/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by William L. Buhlman
$10.20   Used & New from: $7.98
Out of Body Experiences can be induced by stimulating the right angular
gyrus



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_3/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fen\
coding=UTF8&asin.006251671X=1&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=LI%252BaKXcN6eARf5ge0Dw\
wqZKDidFKfRo93MAjw05D0Qwqp%252FhfjoGbEsoDscgF0v7v5ERhqPclneE%253D&submit.add-to-\
registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571742999/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_5/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

The Unanswered Question: Death, Near-Death, and the Afterlife
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571742999/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_5/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Kurt Leland
$11.53   Used & New from: $3.79
The question isnt unanwered, the answer is Hypoxia..check it out in a
medical journal  !



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_4/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fen\
coding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=8IBWhe96y6OZQwd2YNESZUHP9%252BRvTIS6WWFSX\
Z6vBiQfHvnRWIWRWLuLUTwbTKp1j42SC58w610%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry\
&asin.1571742999=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0906165008/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_6/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

A sense of presence: The phenomenology of certain kinds of visionary and
ecstatic experience, based on a thousand contemporary first-hand
accounts (Studies in religious experience)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0906165008/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_6/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Timothy Beardsworth
Used & New from: $104.50
An explanation for this? Sure! Abnormal activity in the temporal lobe

	
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_5/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fen\
coding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asi\
n.0906165008=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0970813716/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_7/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

The Biology of Belief: How Our Biology Biases Our Beliefs and
Perceptions
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0970813716/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_7/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Joseph Giovannoli
$19.95   Used & New from: $15.19



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_6/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fen\
coding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=%252BD8Xqr%252BLCqFaeEiNJCEsgJwsWN%252FYp\
F8WSOHOM5vUOxE2nuOCnq8FToNSm469%252Fw%252F7yQEDTX%252F2C0M%253D&submit.add-to-re\
gistry=addToRegistry&asin.0970813716=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0966036700/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_8/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

The "God" Part of the Brain
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0966036700/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_8/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Matthew Alper
$11.95   Used & New from: $9.75
An atheists perspective



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_7/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fen\
coding=UTF8&asin.0966036700=1&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=R%252B1nL%252BzgM7yCK9S\
qESpbZnIJFFIAg5fQIyaNE4MCn5DzYnhQeI2g9oFO651SgVA5eeNTjjQV9k8%253D&submit.add-to-\
registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0970073313/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_9/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

The Transmitter to God : The Limbic System, the Soul, and Spirituality
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0970073313/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_9/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Rhawn Joseph
$24.00   Used & New from: $14.70



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_8/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fen\
coding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=tF0b1mJXcv7nxf2ZHCP2jGIy9%252F8UTtQ747JCA\
DDZry44fn5%252FauZTPZt0%252BcUYH0xE9zl9TToBMsc%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addTo\
Registry&asin.0970073313=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0975991477/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_10/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

The Biology Of Belief: Unleashing The Power Of Consciousness, Matter And
Miracles
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0975991477/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_10/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Bruce H. Lipton
$16.50   Used & New from: $16.33



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_9/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fen\
coding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=WJ5JJmXGNh2WSqQ54%252FBUrV99%252FkcmxqZn5\
E9wiqoZ9VOAtsWvglSOi4XQh63wNZJ2H1hIfZ958KU%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegi\
stry&asin.0975991477=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/034544034X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_11/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

Why God Won't Go Away : Brain Science and the Biology of Belief
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/034544034X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_11/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Andrew Md Newberg
$11.20   Used & New from: $7.48
Written by theists for theists



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_10/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fe\
ncoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=TSYGh0qP43TZBDK%252FvDbRzs%252FukZj%252F\
Q0MhuLiZkRkBQdNWs6cv1M%252Bztrbb5%252FEDiz%252FbqP9FkW0aCAs%253D&submit.add-to-r\
egistry=addToRegistry&asin.034544034X=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0945724012/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_12/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

Neurotheology: Virtual Religion in the 21st Century
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0945724012/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_12/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Laurence O. McKinney
$13.95   Used & New from: $8.50



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_11/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fe\
ncoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&asin.0945724012=1&offeringID.1=%252F8ly7uBGCfDPd76oVo\
XnpmTJrSG%252FwI0KcZnjt8reYZCxTvQsoJ27LjS1rW19mQdQhrwRWmPK7b4%253D&submit.add-to\
-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0759106673/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_13/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

Why Would Anyone Believe in God? (Cognitive Science of Religion Series)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0759106673/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_13/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Justin L. Barrett
$19.95   Used & New from: $16.00



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_12/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fe\
ncoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=dtTJg1w7Vo984enHt%252B0Su2bA8CdbYiUXy7ke\
uPjvfgbn4pSYrulKp2bJotHEa7iIGBzxUWKxLAc%253D&asin.0759106673=1&submit.add-to-reg\
istry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0465006965/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_14/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0465006965/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_14/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Pascal Boyer
$11.90   Used & New from: $10.99



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_13/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fe\
ncoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=Ff0KK5ZkPZ8xVHMu%252Fi0ozeeLT7j6O2CFNXaK\
pdie%252FESeaZ5D176WLf%252FuUTkK9VeJqwqR4v8a%252F3o%253D&submit.add-to-registry=\
addToRegistry&asin.0465006965=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0385500580/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_15/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

The God Gene : How Faith is Hardwired into our Genes
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0385500580/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_15/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Dean H. Hamer
$16.47   Used & New from: $12.47



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_14/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fe\
ncoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=2aPqJmjLgIlL90WV%252BqHVNtVixUPb1vhSWv4h\
sC7Ymy0F7f%252BfLp0AztKcdsb1jlZowRbnk67T%252F00%253D&asin.0385500580=1&submit.ad\
d-to-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0800631633/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_16/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

The Mystical Mind: Probing the Biology of Religious Experience (Theology
and the Sciences)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0800631633/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_16/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Eugene G. D'Aquili
$13.60   Used & New from: $10.00



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_15/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fe\
ncoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=m9zXuWkNlLbWLdaXZLPTXbn22WvSVBIRmhPWgpuS\
FPRV1lRqGhoLobX3mXcRoHMpM2SwvBc3OFE%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&as\
in.0800631633=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0333912756/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_17/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

Approaches to Consciousness : The Marriage of Science and Mysticism
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0333912756/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_17/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Brian L. Lancaster
$79.00   Used & New from: $67.15



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_16/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fe\
ncoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=7kzasxLv%252B7G6gfo2CKVStiSefaUkc6%252F2\
yS6LWr66ub8dfyTBJKd0J55bF5euE64HqrVmtMmnuE0%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToReg\
istry&asin.0333912756=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0262523027/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_18/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness (Bradford
Books)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0262523027/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_18/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Bernard J. Baars
$47.03   Used & New from: $46.52
great compilation



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_17/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fe\
ncoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=p%252Fjd5jnup9orwSlH1ylYF1FSCuBO9GCOi4F3\
8ISsqVq2aygOKekhN0ewu04zjMy2x%252FTD790gS%252Fg%253D&asin.0262523027=1&submit.ad\
d-to-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1591022673/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
dimg_19/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>

The Psychological Roots Of Religious Belief: Searching For Angels And
The Parent-god
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1591022673/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_19/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by M. D. Faber
$17.82   Used & New from: $11.44



<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_18/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fe\
ncoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=XfVb6Rc5pZEYkyGU33Qm9cDdnZ7GSpEVbOXpYKnL\
WDXUC2HR4KU4n%252BOxNxoanPSjVh7WGYHuY40%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistr\
y&asin.1591022673=1>



shapeshifting list
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/guides/guide-display/-/3GIQMWC2HIRYN/ref=cm\
_bg_dp_m_1/104-9042791-6666329



Afterlife list
http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/listmania/fullview/20AI131QLH8US/104-9042791-66\
66329?%5Fencoding=UTF8

#5807 From: "Daniel N. Washburn" <danw@...>
Date: Tue Jan 3, 2006 2:19 pm
Subject: Book List: NeuroTheology - cleaned up a bit
danw888
Send Email Send Email
 
Here is a NeuroTheology list from Amazon
http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/listmania/fullview/1TGVU6C1FE9C6/104-9042791-66\
66329?%5Fencoding=UTF8



Neuropsychological Bases of God Beliefs.
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0275926486/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_1/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Michael A. Persinger
$70.95


Phantoms in the Brain : Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0688172172/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_2/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by V. S. Ramachandran
$10.88   Used & New from: $5.00


NeuroTheology: Brain, Science, Spirituality, Religious Experience
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0971644586/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_3/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Rhawn Joseph
$44.00   Used & New from: $37.00


The Secret of the Soul : Using Out-of-Body Experiences to Understand Our
True Nature
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/006251671X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_4/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by William L. Buhlman
$10.20   Used & New from: $7.98
Out of Body Experiences can be induced by stimulating the right angular
gyrus


The Unanswered Question: Death, Near-Death, and the Afterlife
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571742999/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_5/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Kurt Leland
$11.53   Used & New from: $3.79
The question isnt unanwered, the answer is Hypoxia..check it out in a
medical journal  !


A sense of presence: The phenomenology of certain kinds of visionary and
ecstatic experience, based on a thousand contemporary first-hand
accounts (Studies in religious experience)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0906165008/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_6/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Timothy Beardsworth
Used & New from: $104.50
An explanation for this? Sure! Abnormal activity in the temporal lobe


The Biology of Belief: How Our Biology Biases Our Beliefs and
Perceptions
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0970813716/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_7/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Joseph Giovannoli
$19.95   Used & New from: $15.19


The "God" Part of the Brain
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0966036700/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_8/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Matthew Alper
$11.95   Used & New from: $9.75
An atheists perspective


The Transmitter to God : The Limbic System, the Soul, and Spirituality
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0970073313/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_9/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Rhawn Joseph
$24.00   Used & New from: $14.70


The Biology Of Belief: Unleashing The Power Of Consciousness, Matter And
Miracles
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0975991477/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_10/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Bruce H. Lipton
$16.50   Used & New from: $16.33


Why God Won't Go Away : Brain Science and the Biology of Belief
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/034544034X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_11/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Andrew Md Newberg
$11.20   Used & New from: $7.48
Written by theists for theists


Neurotheology: Virtual Religion in the 21st Century
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0945724012/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_12/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Laurence O. McKinney
$13.95   Used & New from: $8.50


Why Would Anyone Believe in God? (Cognitive Science of Religion Series)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0759106673/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_13/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Justin L. Barrett
$19.95   Used & New from: $16.00


Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0465006965/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_14/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Pascal Boyer
$11.90   Used & New from: $10.99


The God Gene : How Faith is Hardwired into our Genes
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0385500580/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_15/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Dean H. Hamer
$16.47   Used & New from: $12.47


The Mystical Mind: Probing the Biology of Religious Experience (Theology
and the Sciences)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0800631633/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_16/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Eugene G. D'Aquili
$13.60   Used & New from: $10.00


Approaches to Consciousness : The Marriage of Science and Mysticism
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0333912756/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_17/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Brian L. Lancaster
$79.00   Used & New from: $67.15


Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness (Bradford
Books)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0262523027/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_18/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Bernard J. Baars
$47.03   Used & New from: $46.52
great compilation


The Psychological Roots Of Religious Belief: Searching For Angels And
The Parent-god
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1591022673/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_19/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by M. D. Faber
$17.82   Used & New from: $11.44

#5808 From: "Daniel N. Washburn" <danw@...>
Date: Tue Jan 3, 2006 2:44 pm
Subject: Book List: Afterlife
danw888
Send Email Send Email
 
Here is a list on the Afterlife from Amazon
http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/listmania/fullview/20AI131QLH8US/104-9042791-66\
66329?%5Fencoding=UTF8



Round Trip
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/6304212720/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_1/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
VHS Venantino Venantini      $19.98


God at the Speed of Light
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0876044399/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_2/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by T. Lee, M.D. Baumann      $10.17   Used & New from: $8.50


Lessons from the Light: What We Can Learn from the Near-Death Experience
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0966132785/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_3/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Kenneth Ring      $11.53   Used & New from: $11.00


As it is in Heaven: an interview with Dannion Brinkley
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0967950708/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_4/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
VHS Cindy      $29.95


Saved by the Light
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0061008893/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_5/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Dannion Brinkley      $6.99   Used & New from: $0.91
An amazing story


Life After Life : The Investigation of a Phenomenon--Survival of Bodily
Death
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0062517392/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_6/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Raymond Moody      $10.50   Used & New from: $4.50


The Afterlife Experiments : Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life
After Death
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/074343658X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_7/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Gary E. R. Schwartz      Used & New from: $6.79
A scientific viewpoint


The Afterlife Codes: Searching for Evidence of the Survival of the Soul
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571741917/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_8/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Susy Smith      $10.17   Used & New from: $9.50


After Life
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1932128069/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_9/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by John Edward      $16.29   Used & New from: $3.95
What can I say? I love this man!


Life on the Other Side : A Psychic's Tour of the Afterlife
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0525945393/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_10/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Sylvia Browne      Used & New from: $2.40
My fave author & teacher


Visits from the Afterlife
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0525947566/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_11/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Sylvia Browne      $17.13   Used & New from: $7.99
Can't get enough of this amazing woman's gift !


Fast Lane to Heaven: Celestial Encounters that Changed My Life
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/157174200X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_13/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Ned Dougherty      $14.93   Used & New from: $6.95
I loved this man's inspirational story


Nothing Better Than Death
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1401064116/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_14/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Kevin Williams      $21.99   Used & New from: $17.00


The Grace in Dying : How We Are Transformed Spiritually as We Die
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0062515659/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_15/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Kathleen D. Singh      $10.85   Used & New from: $4.95


Far Journeys
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0385231822/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_16/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Robert Monroe      $10.17   Used & New from: $7.45


Cosmic Journeys: My Out-Of-Body Explorations With Robert A. Monroe
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571741232/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_17/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Rosalind A. McKnight      $11.16   Used & New from: $8.65
Read and you will learn, Seek and you will find!


The Secret of the Soul : Using Out-of-Body Experiences to Understand Our
True Nature
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/006251671X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_18/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by William L. Buhlman      $10.20   Used & New from: $7.98
Need proof of the afterlife? Do some astral traveling!


Astral Travel For Beginners (For Beginners)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/156718796X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_19/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Richard Webster      $9.95   Used & New from: $3.49
Begin Here


Astral Dynamics: A New Approach to Out-of-Body Experiences
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571741437/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_20/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Robert Bruce      $12.89   Used & New from: $11.50
Excellent


Parting Notes: A Connection With the Afterlife
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1403306087/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_21/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by April Crawford      $19.95   Used & New from: $14.76


Voyages into the Unknown (Exploring the Afterlife Series, Vol. 1)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571740686/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_22/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Bruce Moen      $10.36   Used & New from: $3.74
Excellent Series, read them all.


Voyage Beyond Doubt (Exploring the Afterlife Series , Vol 2)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571741011/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_23/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Bruce Moen      $11.16   Used & New from: $7.49


Voyages into the Afterlife: Charting Unknown Territory (Exploring the
Afterlife Series, Vol. 3)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571741399/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_24/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Bruce Moen      $11.16   Used & New from: $5.99


Voyage to Curiosity's Father (Exploring the Afterlife Series)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571742034/ref=cm_lm_fullview_pro\
d_25/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Bruce Moen      $11.16   Used & New from: $5.99

#5809 From: "Daniel N. Washburn" <danw@...>
Date: Tue Jan 3, 2006 2:47 pm
Subject: The Palace of Gold - West Virginia krishna wonder
danw888
Send Email Send Email
 
Take a virtual tour of the West Virginia Hare Krishna Center --
splendors to rival the great cathedrals!

http://www.palaceofgold.com/virtualtour.htm

Dan

#5810 From: "Daniel N. Washburn" <danw@...>
Date: Tue Jan 3, 2006 2:54 pm
Subject: OBE in the blind
danw888
Send Email Send Email
 
Mindsight: Near-Death and Out-of-Body Experiences in the Blind (Paperback)

Book Description
Ring and Cooper explore evidence that even those blind from birth can
"see" during near-death experiences. Their evidence reveals a unique
type of perception. More than just "seeing", it involves a deep
awareness and profound ability to know that the authors have called
"Mindsight".

This volume is a ground-breaking work in the field of near-death
studies. It investigates the astonishing claim that blind persons,
including those blind from birth, can actually "see" during near-death
or out-of-body episodes. The authors present their findings in
scrupulous detail, investigating case histories of blind persons who
have actually reported visual experiences under these conditions.

There is compelling evidence that the blind do "see" in those moments,
but it is not sight as we think of it. Ring and Cooper uncover a kind of
"transcendental awareness" they refer to as mindsight. It involves the
strange experience of being able to perceive from all angles at once,
from every focal depth at once, and a sense of "knowing" the subject,
not just visually, but with a deep and inexplicable knowledge.

Human beings may be more complex than we thought, gifted with amazing
abilities of perception. This book is an opportunity to assess the
evidence for yourself.

About the Author
Kenneth Ring, Ph.D., is Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the
University of Connecticut and co-founder and Past President of the
International Association for Near-Death Studies. He is also the author
of several previous books about near-death experiences, including Life
at Death, Heading Toward Omega, The Omega Project, and most recently,
Lessons from the Light.

Sharon Cooper, M.A., is a Ph.D. candidate in counseling psychology at
New York University. She has studied yoga, Eastern spirituality, and the
field of near-death studies since the early 1980s.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0966963008/ref=pd_sbs_b_4/104-9042791-6666329?%\
5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance&n=283155

#5811 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Tue Jan 3, 2006 3:08 pm
Subject: Daniel Dennett
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Dan
 
Rather a lot of food for the mind hereabouts, isn't there? : )  Thanks for the lists - just wish I had the time and money... 
 
If you, or anybody else, would like a good intro into current philosophical and neurological thinking on topics related to consciouness, mind, self, belief, religions... and more... filtered through the high-level academic and peer review systems, the works of Daniel Dennett are come very highly recommended. 
 
You can access a list of all his work from his homepage:
 
 
A lot of his essays are, sadly, tragically, criminally... in hard to access academic journals.  Searches sometimes turn up internet-published copies though.  The synopsies and reviews of his books at Amazon are well worth reading.  He is very much a leader in these kinds of fields, totally grounded.
 
I say all that on personal recomendation - I haven't actually read any of his work.  I see references quite often, and, as you know I don't often read stuff that doesn't contain reliable references.
 
I have a close friend, a retired senior academic, who has spent a lifetime in psi studies and the like.  Next time I see him I'll ask for a recommendation of a text or two to deliver an up-to-date review of current thinking from the critical perspective.
 
Mike
 
In a message dated 1/3/06 2:09:20 PM GMT Standard Time, danw@... writes:
Amazon NeuroTheology list
http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/listmania/fullview/1TGVU6C1FE9C6/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8

Neuropsychological Bases of God Beliefs.
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0275926486/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_1/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Michael A. Persinger    
$70.95

    <http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_0/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=RGTSxzbmi2bbJnXEzd2qroqFNOq3oBdLX5N3GWqmLXtcd8SykwYGPjsx6EI4uid7BKUFLacg%252FRY%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.0275926486=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0688172172/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_2/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
Phantoms in the Brain : Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0688172172/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_2/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by V. S. Ramachandran    
$10.88   Used & New from: $5.00

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_1/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&asin.0688172172=1&offeringID.1=fEEGynRIYumNlTkbWdXsrddhrXNVyRW3UmOe3ckbaHsJ%252Foh1xK3UGRFtGTkBYydIQIj31Kdz3CM%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0971644586/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_3/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
NeuroTheology: Brain, Science, Spirituality, Religious Experience
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0971644586/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_3/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Rhawn Joseph    
$44.00   Used & New from: $37.00

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_2/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&asin.0971644586=1&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=Nj3nkdTzYamzQ53yGGbiSGkiuHki6clcz66OMqF1BODLYjgKUocnYqiVrEZ%252F46%252BVqHx7c1sPcuk%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/006251671X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_4/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
The Secret of the Soul : Using Out-of-Body Experiences to Understand Our
True Nature
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/006251671X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_4/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by William L. Buhlman    
$10.20   Used & New from: $7.98
Out of Body Experiences can be induced by stimulating the right angular
gyrus

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_3/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&asin.006251671X=1&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=LI%252BaKXcN6eARf5ge0DwwqZKDidFKfRo93MAjw05D0Qwqp%252FhfjoGbEsoDscgF0v7v5ERhqPclneE%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571742999/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_5/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
The Unanswered Question: Death, Near-Death, and the Afterlife
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571742999/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_5/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Kurt Leland    
$11.53   Used & New from: $3.79
The question isnt unanwered, the answer is Hypoxia..check it out in a
medical journal  !

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_4/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=8IBWhe96y6OZQwd2YNESZUHP9%252BRvTIS6WWFSXZ6vBiQfHvnRWIWRWLuLUTwbTKp1j42SC58w610%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.1571742999=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0906165008/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_6/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
A sense of presence: The phenomenology of certain kinds of visionary and
ecstatic experience, based on a thousand contemporary first-hand
accounts (Studies in religious experience)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0906165008/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_6/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Timothy Beardsworth    
Used & New from: $104.50
An explanation for this? Sure! Abnormal activity in the temporal lobe

    <http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_5/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.0906165008=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0970813716/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_7/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
The Biology of Belief: How Our Biology Biases Our Beliefs and
Perceptions
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0970813716/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_7/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Joseph Giovannoli    
$19.95   Used & New from: $15.19


http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_6/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=%252BD8Xqr%252BLCqFaeEiNJCEsgJwsWN%252FYpF8WSOHOM5vUOxE2nuOCnq8FToNSm469%252Fw%252F7yQEDTX%252F2C0M%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.0970813716=1

<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0966036700/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_8/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
The "God" Part of the Brain
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0966036700/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_8/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Matthew Alper    
$11.95   Used & New from: $9.75
An atheists perspective

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_7/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&asin.0966036700=1&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=R%252B1nL%252BzgM7yCK9SqESpbZnIJFFIAg5fQIyaNE4MCn5DzYnhQeI2g9oFO651SgVA5eeNTjjQV9k8%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0970073313/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_9/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
The Transmitter to God : The Limbic System, the Soul, and Spirituality
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0970073313/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_9/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Rhawn Joseph    
$24.00   Used & New from: $14.70

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_8/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=tF0b1mJXcv7nxf2ZHCP2jGIy9%252F8UTtQ747JCADDZry44fn5%252FauZTPZt0%252BcUYH0xE9zl9TToBMsc%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.0970073313=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0975991477/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_10/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
The Biology Of Belief: Unleashing The Power Of Consciousness, Matter And
Miracles
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0975991477/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_10/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Bruce H. Lipton    
$16.50   Used & New from: $16.33

http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_9/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=WJ5JJmXGNh2WSqQ54%252FBUrV99%252FkcmxqZn5E9wiqoZ9VOAtsWvglSOi4XQh63wNZJ2H1hIfZ958KU%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.0975991477=1

<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/034544034X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_11/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
Why God Won't Go Away : Brain Science and the Biology of Belief
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/034544034X/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_11/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Andrew Md Newberg    
$11.20   Used & New from: $7.48
Written by theists for theists
 

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_10/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=TSYGh0qP43TZBDK%252FvDbRzs%252FukZj%252FQ0MhuLiZkRkBQdNWs6cv1M%252Bztrbb5%252FEDiz%252FbqP9FkW0aCAs%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.034544034X=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0945724012/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_12/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
Neurotheology: Virtual Religion in the 21st Century
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0945724012/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_12/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Laurence O. McKinney    
$13.95   Used & New from: $8.50

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_11/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&asin.0945724012=1&offeringID.1=%252F8ly7uBGCfDPd76oVoXnpmTJrSG%252FwI0KcZnjt8reYZCxTvQsoJ27LjS1rW19mQdQhrwRWmPK7b4%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0759106673/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_13/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
Why Would Anyone Believe in God? (Cognitive Science of Religion Series)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0759106673/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_13/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Justin L. Barrett    
$19.95   Used & New from: $16.00

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_12/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=dtTJg1w7Vo984enHt%252B0Su2bA8CdbYiUXy7keuPjvfgbn4pSYrulKp2bJotHEa7iIGBzxUWKxLAc%253D&asin.0759106673=1&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0465006965/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_14/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0465006965/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_14/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Pascal Boyer    
$11.90   Used & New from: $10.99

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_13/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=Ff0KK5ZkPZ8xVHMu%252Fi0ozeeLT7j6O2CFNXaKpdie%252FESeaZ5D176WLf%252FuUTkK9VeJqwqR4v8a%252F3o%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.0465006965=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0385500580/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_15/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
The God Gene : How Faith is Hardwired into our Genes
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0385500580/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_15/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Dean H. Hamer    
$16.47   Used & New from: $12.47

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_14/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=2aPqJmjLgIlL90WV%252BqHVNtVixUPb1vhSWv4hsC7Ymy0F7f%252BfLp0AztKcdsb1jlZowRbnk67T%252F00%253D&asin.0385500580=1&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0800631633/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_16/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
The Mystical Mind: Probing the Biology of Religious Experience (Theology
and the Sciences)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0800631633/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_16/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Eugene G. D'Aquili    
$13.60   Used & New from: $10.00

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_15/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=m9zXuWkNlLbWLdaXZLPTXbn22WvSVBIRmhPWgpuSFPRV1lRqGhoLobX3mXcRoHMpM2SwvBc3OFE%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.0800631633=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0333912756/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_17/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
Approaches to Consciousness : The Marriage of Science and Mysticism
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0333912756/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_17/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Brian L. Lancaster    
$79.00   Used & New from: $67.15

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_16/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=7kzasxLv%252B7G6gfo2CKVStiSefaUkc6%252F2yS6LWr66ub8dfyTBJKd0J55bF5euE64HqrVmtMmnuE0%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.0333912756=1>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0262523027/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_18/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness (Bradford
Books)
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0262523027/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_18/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by Bernard J. Baars    
$47.03   Used & New from: $46.52
great compilation

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_17/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=p%252Fjd5jnup9orwSlH1ylYF1FSCuBO9GCOi4F38ISsqVq2aygOKekhN0ewu04zjMy2x%252FTD790gS%252Fg%253D&asin.0262523027=1&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry>


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1591022673/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prodimg_19/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
   
The Psychological Roots Of Religious Belief: Searching For Angels And
The Parent-god
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1591022673/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_19/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance>
by M. D. Faber    
$17.82   Used & New from: $11.44

   

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/item-dispatch/ref=cm_lm_wl_18/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8&type=wishlist&offeringID.1=XfVb6Rc5pZEYkyGU33Qm9cDdnZ7GSpEVbOXpYKnLWDXUC2HR4KU4n%252BOxNxoanPSjVh7WGYHuY40%253D&submit.add-to-registry=addToRegistry&asin.1591022673=1>



shapeshifting list
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/guides/guide-display/-/3GIQMWC2HIRYN/ref=cm_bg_dp_m_1/104-9042791-6666329



Afterlife list
http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/listmania/fullview/20AI131QLH8US/104-9042791-6666329?%5Fencoding=UTF8
 

#5812 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Tue Jan 3, 2006 3:21 pm
Subject: Dawkins on TV
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 

For UK residents (if there are any) Richard Dawkins will be presenting a two-parter beginning next monday on Channel 4 at 8.00. 

"Root of all Evil, 1; The God Delusion

Professor Richard Dawkins, the world-renowned evolutionary biologist, whose atheism has earned him the nickname of 'Darwin’s Rottweiler', takes a personal journey through the world’s three great monotheistic religions: Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

Dawkins thinks it is time for science to stop sitting on the fence. In the light of overwhelming scientific evidence that, he believes, shows a supreme being cannot exist, and in a world in which religious conflict and bigotry are increasingly centre stage, Dawkins argues that for the good of humanity, religion needs to be challenged and disproved. Never one to shy away from a debate, Dawkins meets leaders from the Christian, Jewish and Muslim religions to find out how their beliefs fit with modern science's extraordinary knowledge of our world and the wider universe.

In The Root of All Evil Dawkins accuses the religious establishment of preying on people’s desire to believe in a greater being; abusing reason and humanity in the process. Ultimately he asks how they can defend what religion has done, and is doing to us?  "

What I'd like to see is Dawkins arguing his views with scientists who oppose him...

Mike


#5813 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Tue Jan 3, 2006 3:27 pm
Subject: Origins of Culture by Natural Selection
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 

“"Darwin's meme: or the origin of culture by means of natural selection"”

Event:
Lecture
Date:
Monday, 13rd February 2006
Time:
6:30pm
Venue:
Darwin Lecture Theatre, Darwin Building, UCL, Gower Street, London
Location:
London, UK

Professor Dawkins will chair a lecture by Dr Susan Blackmore on the origins of culture by natural selection. This should prove to be a very stimulating evening as two of the most repected public speakers of science will be present in one venue.

Tickets are £5/£3 to BHA (That'll be British Humanist Association - MB) members. Book by phone 020 7079 3580 or by email through the BHA websit
www.humanism.org.uk

I just wish I lived closer to London
 
Mike

#5814 From: IAMMYRIAH@...
Date: Wed Jan 4, 2006 2:15 pm
Subject: Re: [sl] Book List: Afterlife
IAMMYRIAH@...
Send Email Send Email
 
A must read on this topic and not listed here is 'Hello From Heaven' by Bill and Judy Guggenheim.  Published in 1995.  They researched over 2,000 people who had direct afterlife contact from their loved ones, and have categorized several common types of contact.  I also interviewed Judy Guggenheim at a time I was working for an on line spiritual journal.  Powerful book.

Myriah


#5815 From: "Daniel N. Washburn" <danw@...>
Date: Thu Jan 5, 2006 1:11 am
Subject: Re: [sl] Book List: Afterlife
danw888
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, Myriah

Thanks for the ref.

One that I have just read, and a very good one, is Afterlife Encounters
by Diane Archangeli (?)  She is a hospice counselor and head of the
Elizabeth Kubler-Ross center in Houston.

Dan

IAMMYRIAH@... wrote:

> A must read on this topic and not listed here is 'Hello From Heaven'
> by Bill and Judy Guggenheim.  Published in 1995.  They researched over
> 2,000 people who had direct afterlife contact from their loved ones,
> and have categorized several common types of contact.  I also
> interviewed Judy Guggenheim at a time I was working for an on line
> spiritual journal.  Powerful book.
>
> Myriah
>
>
>
> Topics suitable for discussion in this e-list can be found at:
> http://www.luckymojo.com/sacredland.html
>
> To UNsubscribe, send email to:
> sacredlandscapelist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>     *  Visit your group "sacredlandscapelist
>       <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sacredlandscapelist>" on the web.
>
>     *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>        sacredlandscapelist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>      
<mailto:sacredlandscapelist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
>     *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

#5816 From: "Daniel N. Washburn" <danw@...>
Date: Thu Jan 5, 2006 1:13 am
Subject: scientific validation
danw888
Send Email Send Email
 
Mike has objected to my use of the words 'scientific validation,' and I
have objected to his use of 'belief' to characterize my understandings.

Here is how I propose to use these words

1 belief - no evidence whatsoever

2 intuition - some very questionable evidence eg. empty tomb proves
resurrection

3 anecdote - field reports, eg ufo sightings, no tooth decay in certain
areas

4 survey - field reports systematically collected and analysed

5 hypothesis - testable propositions are formulated, experiments are
carried out

6 replication - experiments are repeated across researchers,
laboratories, methods

7 acceptance - some members of the scientific community accept the
results as true

8 validation - nearly all members of the scientific community accept the
results as true

9 technology - results are used in practical applications

10 integration - results are well understood within the larger body of
scientific laws

In this sense I do not have beliefs about god, parapsychology,
mysticism, and the afterlife

My understandings range from intuition through acceptance

Remote Viewing - now up to 7.  Some members of the scientific community
now believe the replication has taken place and they accept remote
viewing as true.

Dan

#5817 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Thu Jan 5, 2006 5:04 am
Subject: Re: [sl] scientific validation
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi Dan,

 

A very useful exercise.  A few early thoughts

 

A    From a philosophical point of view I think everything held to _be_ about the world (and other worlds) is usually regarded as 'belief'; but some beliefs are better justified than others.  Thus we may both believe turtles exist, but if your belief is supported by well-attested evidence and first-hand experience, whereas mine is the result of something a kid told me, your belief in turtles is better-justified than mine.

 

B    From the same point of view; Descartes' "I think therefore I am" remains a great force, in the sense that knowledge of one's own perception of being is all one can really claim to be said to 'know'.  All else comes through channels - the senses and the imagination - that are notoriously unreliable. This leads to what is known as the 'evil demon' or 'brain-in-a-vat' problem; that one might not exist in this world at all, but be in a different world of which we have no knowledge, fed sensory information that leads us think we exist in this world.  We cannot deny this problem; yet it makes best sense to believe ourselves to really exist in the world as presented to our senses.  We proceed however, on the basis of pragmatism rather than true knowledge.

 

C    With that behind us, and accepting (within limits) of the evidence of our immediate senses, we have to ask to what degree our perceptions of the world coincide with reality.  There are two main problems (as I see it).  First that our senses supply only very limited glimpses of the totality of reality (that which is local, or within line of site and large enough to see, and presents in the timeframe we have access to, and which is discernable to our senses); second, that that sensory material appears to be utilized by the brain to create a model of the world that makes internal sense, and which is then presented to 'us' as the real world.  It isn't, it is a construct of the mind.  Its often wrong - think of the many different accounts of the same incident given by several witnesses. 

 

D     With that general background in mind, I think we should think in terms of how well any particular 'belief' can be justified.  Now your schema, adjusted to take account of these linguistic conventions, would start to provide an expression of the range of reliability of beliefs.  It is however linear and thus one-dimensional, which I think restricts it somewhat.  Also, I would quibble with the notion that 'intuition' should take anything like the place you put it.  Intuition for me is the specific rising of a new, untested, thought, from origins unknown (I believe the unconscious brain - but I'd love to hear we had little radios in our heads), offering anything from a fantasic new understanding to a complete nonsense.  An idea in other words that must be tested against known factors in order to be evaluated.

 

Off the top of my head; my scheme of reliability of ideas, or 'knowledge', might look more like this:

 

1    (Lowest rating) Completely untested proposition.  This might be my own intuition (at the moment of conception), or an anecdote from an untrusted source (which covers plenty of ground : ).  I expect we could think up further sub-categories.  We should note that while these are completely untrustworthy, they may well provide leads for investigation, and may be later upgraded to sure-as-can-be category.  I think this corresponds fairly with your categories 1 to 8 Dan?  (I'd leave 9 out, I think its a distraction)   Religious claims of all kinds of course reside in this category. 

 

2a    First-hand empirical & examined.  This covers material that I have examined at first hand and have satisfied myself to be as real as I can know.  Think there's a keyboard under my fingers at the moment, and I'm fairly sure I'm not dreaming.  I don't think your scheme covers this Dan? 

 

2b    Second-hand empirical from trusted sources.  This category includes material that is presented to me personally by people who's ability to discern I accept - at that time and of that subject.  If my son reports he has a flat tyre on his bicycle I can be fairy sure that is true; if he reports the puncture repair kit is not where it should be, I will, knowing where I put it, and his poor ability to see what's in front of his nose, treat the statement with some skepticism.  It also includes material that has been accepted by the academic/scientific community - but with the proviso that I accept that itself to be incapable of perfection, merely provisional and vastly incomplete.  But still, the best we have, and most often very good indeed.  This (last bit) corresponds to your 10.

 

My categories 2a and 2b represent that material that I think may contribute directly to my understanding of the world. 

 

There's also the issue of sound reasoning to be fitted in there... 

 

I think its worth noting that scheme is far from perfect, and that my knowledge about the world is similarly imperfect.  However, as a person I am very concerned with an awareness of the status of all my ideas within my own epistemological scheme.  If my thinking is based on rubbish premises I want to know about it. 

 

I'm concerned that my beliefs are justified, and work hard to keep things that way.  There are a number of reasons for this, but I think the best is that my belief system is what supplies me with a sense of what may be true and what is likely not - and 'truth' is my... 'sacred,' my 'divine'.  If I'm sloppy I will never be able to believe I know anything at all about anything.  Then what would be the point of anything?  My trust in my ability to discern truth and falsehood to at least some degree gives my thoughts meaning, in the sense that I can believe they correspond in some manner to what is real.  

 

I think the offerings of Kuhn and Wittgenstein are relevant to contemporary views, but I'm unfamiliar with them.  An interesting snip from http://www.uea.ac.uk/~j339/Kuhntogo.htm:

 

"...who has ever really supposed that anyone can just enter into an area of scientific work and make an effective intervention? And who has suggested that any innovatory contribution has nothing whatever to do with the previously extant results of science? Who imagines that anyone can – and quite arbitrarily – put forward a new scientific paradigm and any old one that one is inclined to do, that one can just decide that’s how nature is? Everything that Kuhn says amounts to: natural science is anything but easy.

Of course, philosophy of science does make differences: we’d like our philosophical intervention to help put an end to a long and utterly futile dispute, we’d like people to see that the ‘science’ and ‘culture’ wars have been carried on by largely naked emperors, and that what people might have thought were reasons to e.g. devalue science or to take up arms against Realists are only bad reasons – just as are the reasons one has been given for sticking with the Realists."

I wouldn't expect to be able to even comprehend what they have to say without studying them for some time.  There's a useful-looking introduction to epistemology at: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/EPISTEMI.html

 

A wonderful introduction to these issues, which offers also to equip one in matters of western history as well as epistemology, is via Plato and Aristotle.  The former much the easier.  The Sophist and Theatetus are I think the best for studies of 'knowing'.

 

> In this sense I do not have beliefs about god, parapsychology,
> mysticism, and the afterlife

 

According to my scheme this would be a untrue statement.  (Leaving aside the fact that its a bit of flannel designed to hoick your beliefs about God etc. into the realm of nearly-scientifically justified.) 

 

You do believe in the existence of a God, the validity of some results from parapsychological studies, the broad existence of the 'otherworldly' and the afterlife.  For me to hold those beliefs would be unjustified; but perhaps you have had experiences that I have not, and are sufficiently satisfied in their veracity in support of the larger worldview in which you feel comfortable, to consider them justified. 

 

I think Dan, and forgive me for intruding; you are trying to design a scheme that justifies your existing mindset, rather than a scheme that will be of real value in discriminating between well justified and unjustified beliefs.  I humbly suggest: if one subscribes to the view that God is Truth, it is one's religious duty to look impartially at ways of discerning Truth.  

 

Cheers,

 

Mike
 
In a message dated 1/5/06 1:13:53 AM GMT Standard Time, danw@... writes:
Mike has objected to my use of the words 'scientific validation,' and I
have objected to his use of 'belief' to characterize my understandings.

Here is how I propose to use these words

1 belief - no evidence whatsoever

2 intuition - some very questionable evidence eg. empty tomb proves
resurrection

3 anecdote - field reports, eg ufo sightings, no tooth decay in certain
areas

4 survey - field reports systematically collected and analysed

5 hypothesis - testable propositions are formulated, experiments are
carried out

6 replication - experiments are repeated across researchers,
laboratories, methods

7 acceptance - some members of the scientific community accept the
results as true

8 validation - nearly all members of the scientific community accept the
results as true

9 technology - results are used in practical applications

10 integration - results are well understood within the larger body of
scientific laws

In this sense I do not have beliefs about god, parapsychology,
mysticism, and the afterlife

My understandings range from intuition through acceptance

Remote Viewing - now up to 7.  Some members of the scientific community
now believe the replication has taken place and they accept remote
viewing as true.

Dan
 

#5818 From: Ambrose Hawk <ahawk@...>
Date: Fri Jan 6, 2006 5:12 pm
Subject: pathological neurons
AmbroseHawk
Send Email Send Email
 
What amuses me about those "scientific" analyses on things like near
death is that they overlook a key point.
We know that the chemicals and hypoxia etc. produce many of the
sensations which are components of the experiences reported, but never
the complete experience itself, nor usually the persisting effects in
the personality of the individual.
However, those experiences are clearly and carefully monitored on their
devices ... yet a "near death" experience is considered such because
those monitors are flatlined!

Further, it should be an obvious point that for a human to retain and to
integrate a spiritual experience, it must necessarily have physical
analogs for the body to use to recall and to communicate it ...  thus,
finding such bits and pieces counterfeited by drugs etc. does not, IMHO,
"disprove" the original experience, but rather tends to confirm its
reality to me ...

:)
Ambrose

--
IN HOC MODO MILLIS FRANGITVR .

#5819 From: Ambrose Hawk <ahawk@...>
Date: Fri Jan 6, 2006 7:45 pm
Subject: Re: [sl] Digest Number 1030
AmbroseHawk
Send Email Send Email
 
Mike wrote:
Completely untested proposition. (snip) Religious claims of all kinds of
course reside in this  category.
--
Hardly.
The rigors to which a claimed miracle are subjected with the Catholic
Church are fairly severe.
Secondarily, many religions are constantly subjected to examination and
to testing of various kinds.
Indeed, for a significant number of devotees, their religious
perceptions and practices clearly meet the criteria of "First-hand
empirical & examined."
Obviously all too many folks think that their religion fits your highest
category as well ... "Second-hand  empirical from trusted sources."
LOL
Ambrose
--
IN HOC MODO MILLIS FRANGITVR .

#5820 From: "Daniel N. Washburn" <danw@...>
Date: Sat Jan 7, 2006 12:34 am
Subject: Re: [sl] pathological neurons
danw888
Send Email Send Email
 
Good points, Ambrose

When people talk about psychedelic drugs being able to produce mystical
states, I think about the analogy with visual hallucinations.  Visual
hallucinations are produced in a part of the brain that is dedicated to
visual processing of real world data.  In using psychedelics, when I
have ah hallucination of God, am I using a part of the brain that
processes real world mystical data?

Dan

Ambrose Hawk wrote:

>What amuses me about those "scientific" analyses on things like neart
>death is that they overlook a key point.
>We know that the chemicals and hypoxia etc. produce many of the
>sensations which are components of the experiences reported, but never
>the complete experience itself, nor usually the persisting effects in
>the personality of the individual.
>However, those experiences are clearly and carefully monitored on their
>devices ... yet a "near death" experience is considered such because
>those monitors are flatlined!
>
>Further, it should be an obvious point that for a human to retain and to
>integrate a spiritual experience, it must necessarily have physical
>analogs for the body to use to recall and to communicate it ...  thus,
>finding such bits and pieces counterfeited by drugs etc. does not, IMHO,
>"disprove" the original experience, but rather tends to confirm its
>reality to me ...
>
>:)
>Ambrose
>
>--
>IN HOC MODO MILLIS FRANGITVR .
>
>
>
>
>
>Topics suitable for discussion in this e-list can be found at:
>http://www.luckymojo.com/sacredland.html
>
>To UNsubscribe, send email to:
>sacredlandscapelist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

#5821 From: "Eugene Johnson" <eugenemj@...>
Date: Sat Jan 7, 2006 2:16 am
Subject: Re: Dawkins on TV
anthropik9
Send Email Send Email
 
--The (man) protests to much, I think..

People who constantly push a cause tend to leave me a little
suspicious as to their real motivations.   Why mount a vendetta
against religion?  To save the world from the practice of bad
religion is one thing, an admirable thing, a worthy service perhaps,
but an attack on humanities whole spiritual enterprise is way over
the top, in my opinion.

The mistake that hard headed intellectual types like Dawkins make is
that they don't have the insight and sensitivity to distinguish the
wheat from the chaff; to them, apparently, "it all looks the same";
when, in fact, there is a world of difference between the religious
sensibilities of a self-avowed fundamentalist, of any religion, and,
for a want of a better word, "a non-fundamentalist", of any religion.

For anyone interested in this subject the current issue of Parabola
is devoted to this issue of religious fundamentalism.

The issue contains several interesting articles, one of Huston
Smith.  In one place Smith says: "fundamentalism takes what is
intrinsically an indispensible necessity and turns it into a
doctrine, which is likely to be disputable..."

The interviewer then says: "I see it more as a meander through the
labyrinth.  It seems that the one thread through the debate about the
root cause of fundamentalism is the spector of being threatened,
cornered, even shamed by modernity".

Smith responds: "Exactly, I like your phrase, "the specter of being
threatened".  In the case of Christianity, the specter emerged around
the end of the last century.  Why then?  Because the churches felt
threatened, as you say. This is worth coming down hard on for the
point will thread its way through the rest of the interview.  The
underlying cause of fundamentlism is this sense of being threatened."

"The threats that produced fundamentalism a century or so ago were
basically two - Darwinism...and Higher Criticism...Regarding
Darwinism..so, as the six days of creation were metaphorical, not
literal ( for the non-fundamentalist ), there was nothing to fear
from a fossil record that showed that it took millions of years for
human beings to come into existence.  However, there is no way to
derive the foundational component of the human self - the 'imago
dei', the Buddha nature, the Atman and the Uncarved Block, whatever
the idiom - from natural sleection working with chance variations.
So if Darwinism claimed to tell the whole story, it did threaten
Christianity.."

Another article, "Where Has God Gone", by William Ventimiglia who
says: "One thing is certain - religious feeling is a given.
Religious feeling goes to the very core of the personality and
without it many people find life unsustainable...the "ground of
being""

"The violent face of radical fundamentalsim reflects just such a
primitive defense of the collective, tribal, group self - an
infectious narcisstic rage, an emotional flooding that inflates the
ego with holy vengence and wrath..."

In 1925 C.G. Jung stated, " you can run across people who think
themselves born without a religious sense, and this is just as absurd
as if they said they were born without eyes.  It simply means they
have left all that side of themselves in the unconscious.."

Returning to Mr. Dawkins, I suppose one could say that either his
unconscious may be in a perilous state, or Mr. Dawkins is indeed a
fresh prototype of the New Darwinian Man,a new human mutation,
forever cut free from the surly bonds of religious needs and all the
irrational behavior such brings in its train....

Gene  J

- In sacredlandscapelist@yahoogroups.com, mikebispham@a... wrote:
>
>
> For UK residents (if there are any)  Richard Dawkins will be
presenting a
> two-parter beginning next monday on Channel  4 at 8.00.
> "Root of all Evil, 1; The God Delusion
> Professor Richard Dawkins, the world-renowned evolutionary
biologist, whose
> atheism has earned him the nickname of 'Darwin’s Rottweiler',
takes a personal
>  journey through the world’s three great monotheistic religions:
> Christianity,  Judaism and Islam.
> Dawkins thinks it is time for science to stop sitting on the fence.
In the
> light of overwhelming scientific evidence that, he believes, shows
a supreme
> being cannot exist, and in a world in which religious conflict and
bigotry are
> increasingly centre stage, Dawkins argues that for the good of
humanity,
> religion needs to be challenged and disproved. Never one to shy
away from a
> debate, Dawkins meets leaders from the Christian, Jewish and Muslim
religions to
> find out how their beliefs fit with modern science's extraordinary
knowledge
> of  our world and the wider universe.
> In The Root of All Evil Dawkins accuses the religious establishment
of
> preying on people’s desire to believe in a greater being; abusing
reason and
> humanity in the process. Ultimately he asks how they can defend
what religion  has
> done, and is doing to us?  "
> What I'd like to see is Dawkins arguing his views with scientists
who oppose
> him...
> Mike
>

#5822 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Sat Jan 7, 2006 5:07 am
Subject: New List
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi All

 

Feeling that a lot of the time my ways of thinking are discomforting to people here, and that most members of the list are largely driven by issues of belief that are not relevant to my own interests and approach, I have set up a new list to provide a place for more secularly based discussions of the topics we originally set out to explore. 

 

The subject list is very similar to that at sl, but with 'sacred' removed to facilitate discussions that otherwise founder on differences of core belief.  The chief focus has been restored to latent order in the natural world, approachable through mathematics, and the employment of mathematics in human artifacts.

 

The broad aims of the list are encompassed by it's name, 'Ad Quadratum,' which refers first to one of the two design and construction methods used by (at least some of) the cathedral builders of Europe.  I envisage critical discussions centred on the relationships that emerge between the four poles of Mathematics, Nature, Human Experience, and Cultural Artifacts.   

 

I could expand on that a little by saying I want to explore mathematics in historical art and artifacts; exploring the ways in which human understanding of the world has developed by recognising mathematical patterns in nature, and seeking to understand and utilize them. 

 

A fuller outline of aims and topics appears at the homepage.  I haven't actually got a topic list together yet.

 

I will also, as usual, be keeping an eye out for philosophical and linguistic traps - examining ways of knowing from a philosophical perspective; and generally engaging in conversations that will amuse, challenge, or enlighten us all in some way. 

 

If you'd like to join the group, head on over to:

 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AdQuad/

 

Hope to see some of you there,

 

Best wishes,
 
Mike

#5823 From: "Eugene Johnson" <eugenemj@...>
Date: Sun Jan 8, 2006 7:35 pm
Subject: Gothic cathedrals
anthropik9
Send Email Send Email
 
Mike, if you are still out there, hope you change your mind and
continue to share your thoughts with us.

I'm sorry that Mike has decided to "abandon the field", rather than to
continue the debate, but the fact that it occured suggests that it
contained something important, something relevant to the times and
worth talikng about,

I recently discovered a book, "The Transformative Vision - Reflections
on Nature and History of Human Expression", by Arguelles.  It was his
first book, published in 1975.  The inspiration for the book came to
him one day in art class when he had the insight that modern art had
become nothing more than than a game of style, "...like clothes to be
taken off or put on without the slightest regard to the inner
feelings.."  He says," The problem of art is inextricably involved with
the problem of history, and the problem of history with the unfathomed
depths of man's own nature.  A rare art historian like Wihelm Worringer
revealed to me that art was generated by spiritual forces, and that art
history properly understood was a "history of the human psyche and its
forms of expression.."

Reading this I realized that what he was saying related to our rambling
debate about, science, religion, spirituality, consciousness,etc.  The
meaning of "Transformative Vision" for Arguelles, is that our survival
depends on a "transcendance of the conflicts we call history..by the
integration of 'psyche' ( right hemisphere ) and 'techne' ( left
hemisphere ).." though these two aspects of human nature can function
independently of each other, the degree of their independence defines
the degree of human imbalance, sickness or insanity.  In actuality they
cannot be understoon separately.  Being whole, the mutual self-
definition comprizes the basis of the psychophysical point of view.."

"Should the idology and mentality of history prevail, then the
transformative vision may have to continue as a strange underground
development..a rhythm more powerful and inexorable than the rhythm of
human reason is sweeping through the human race...this rhythm is the
heartbeat of the transformative vision."

On page 49 of the book Arguelles gives wonderful description of the
meaning of the Gothic cathedral in medieval life.

"..culture is the universally understoood means of expression of a
given social organism; the more highly integrated the culture, the more
conscious and universally shared are the means and meaning of
expression.  The great craftsmen and builders of Gothic Europe were
able to bring about a high level of cultural integration by the
construction of cathedrals.  The process of erecting these great
edifices offered an opportunity for universal participation, uniting
all the arts, beliefs and spiritual practices of the society in one
tangible whole."

"The case of mid-eithteenth-century Europe is quite the reverse; the
arts were no longer coalesced into one work but fragmented into easel
painting, chamber music, novels, and secular architecture. Furthermore,
the craft/guild system was under fatal attack from two sides - the
usurpation of the arts by the academies, and the mechanization of life
that was about to become universal, thus dispensing with the need
for "handicrafts"...the means of culture  were now left in the hands of
a few privileged people only shows that the rest of the people, "the
masses", were culturally deprived.  Not only would the masses become
desensitized and brutalized as a result, but the very meaning of life
could no longer be coherently expressed and transmitted.  This, then,
is the bane of mechanized civilization."

"Cultural disintegration, which manifests socially in increasing modes
of specialization- professionalism -has been aggravated by universal
sensory fragmentation. Again, the Gothic cathedral provides an example
of an aesthetic process whose end is achieved when a participant is
able to experience a state of psychosensorial interfusion.  The effect
of different sensory agents acting upon the participant simultaneously
transfuses and uplifts the whole being, evoking a transcendant
experience.  With the onset of the Renaissance this total experience
became much more the exception than the rule.  One may recall certain
multimedia events,  such as the synchronization of water sculpture,
lights, and music by the great Baroque artist Gianlorenzo Bernini who
was familiar with the nature of mystical experience."

"By and large, from the sixteenth century onward Europeans suffered
increasing sensorial frgamentation, an inevitable result of the
mechanization of consciousness, which naturally limits the organism to
a splintered, sequential point of view.."

Gene  J

#5824 From: Khem Caigan <Khem@...>
Date: Sun Jan 8, 2006 8:01 pm
Subject: Charles Henry [ was: Gothic cathedrals ]
khemcaigan
Send Email Send Email
 
Eugene Johnson writes:
>
<SNIPS>
> I recently discovered a book, "The Transformative Vision -
> Reflections on Nature and History of Human Expression", by
> Arguelles. It was his first book, published in 1975.

Arguelles first book was _Charles Henry and the Formation of
a Psychophysical Aesthetic_, published in 1972.


Michael Moynihan Speaks
With Jos Argelles
http://tinyurl.com/cmq4j


"In 1886 Seurat met mathematician and scientist Charles
Henry. Vocal in his ideas about the interconnections between
aesthetics and science, Henry influenced Seurats desire to
logically control color and space and his later attempts to
find methodical, scientific means of composition."
http://tinyurl.com/avqgw

"In August 1885 Charles Henry published his "Introduction A
une esthetique scientifique," which argued for an art based
on scientific principles.

As a result of Henry's study of perception, Seurat started
using his technique of "optical mixture." In
October-November 1885 he applied tiny dots of pure color,
which, it was thought, the spectator's eye would recompose
at a distance."
http://tinyurl.com/csnnt

"Other influences on George Seurat included Sutter's
Phenomena of Vision (1880) in which he wrote that 'the laws
of harmony can be learned as one learns the laws of harmony
and music'[1], as well as mathematician Charles Henry who in
the 1880s would hold monologues at the Sorbonne about the
emotional properties and symbolic meaning of lines and
color. Henry's ideas would be quickly adopted by the founder
of Neoimpressionism."
http://tinyurl.com/77nc2

"Seurat adopted some of the concepts described in an article
entitled The Phenomena of Vision, written by theorist David
Sutter. Sutter maintained that light was composed of three
main elements: vertical, horizontal, and diagonal, and
proposed emotional equivalents for certain colors and forms.
Sutters analysis of light and line fed into the work of the
mathematician Charles Henry. Henry attempted to define a
method for artists to create harmony by coordinating line
and color according to specific geometric and algebra formulas."
http://tinyurl.com/aynhw

Cors in Manu Domine,


~ Khem Caigan
<Khem@...>

#5825 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Mon Jan 9, 2006 11:21 am
Subject: Re: [sl] Gothic cathedrals
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Gene,
 
I didn't mean I'd be disappearing from this list, just that I wanted anther space to work in that would allow discussions of an objective nature to take place on various topics, mostly relating to the way the world has been veiwed and understood in the past, and the ways that understanding has been shaped by recognition of natural patterns - or maths. 
 
While the discussion of the nature and meaning of 'the sacred' is appropriate here, it does get in the way of historical and cosmological exploration.   
 
In response to the rest of your post: while I'm sure its an interesting issue, I'm not sure I can see where you are headed with this material, and am sure your material centred on gothic gathedrals is well off the mark:
 
"..culture is the universally understoood means of expression of a
given social organism; the more highly integrated the culture, the more
conscious and universally shared are the means and meaning of
expression.  The great craftsmen and builders of Gothic Europe were
able to bring about a high level of cultural integration by the
construction of cathedrals.  The process of erecting these great
edifices offered an opportunity for universal participation, uniting
all the arts, beliefs and spiritual practices of the society in one
tangible whole."
 
While there is something right in here, there is also much that is wrong.  About the only thing that united all the players in cathedral building - most of the time - was the money those in charge payed to the rest.  Sure, the artistic programmes offered a unity of aesthetic, and sure, the interpretation of creation as a mathematical proposition provided support for that - but somehow I don't think that's what you are trying to convey.
 
I love cathedrals, but I have no illusions about the ways they were built, or what they were built for.  They were, (largely) simultaniusly, power-structures and tourist magnets; designed to reinforce the staus quo that saw a tiny minority live in comfort while the rest grubbed; to supply funds, security, status and glory to their owners.  They were often designed to house and sell the notion of praying for dead souls by contract.  They are, largely, the very beautiful results of a great scam.  They are also very much an expression of the human love of building, and building bigger and better.
 
>"Cultural disintegration, which manifests socially in increasing modes
of specialization- professionalism -has been aggravated by universal
sensory fragmentation. Again, the Gothic cathedral provides an example
of an aesthetic process whose end is achieved when a participant is
able to experience a state of psychosensorial interfusion.  The effect
of different sensory agents acting upon the participant simultaneously
transfuses and uplifts the whole being, evoking a transcendant
experience.  With the onset of the Renaissance this total experience
became much more the exception than the rule.  One may recall certain
multimedia events,  such as the synchronization of water sculpture,
lights, and music by the great Baroque artist Gianlorenzo Bernini who
was familiar with the nature of mystical experience."

>"By and large, from the sixteenth century onward Europeans suffered
increasing sensorial frgamentation, an inevitable result of the
mechanization of consciousness, which naturally limits the organism to
a splintered, sequential point of view.."
 
This is all very imprecise, and seems to me to exhibit most of all a strong sense of cherry-picking history in support of a hobby-horse.  As I say, where are you going?  What is your solution to this spintered sense of common ethic you identify?  A new common ethical system I imagine: ok, spell it out for us - in what ways will you mend the rift bought about by multiculturalism?
 
Mike
 
 
 
In a message dated 1/8/06 7:36:14 PM GMT Standard Time, eugenemj@... writes:
Mike, if you are still out there, hope you change your mind and
continue to share your thoughts with us.

I'm sorry that Mike has decided to "abandon the field", rather than to
continue the debate, but the fact that it occured suggests that it
contained something important, something relevant to the times and
worth talikng about, 

I recently discovered a book, "The Transformative Vision - Reflections
on Nature and History of Human Expression", by Arguelles.  It was his
first book, published in 1975.  The inspiration for the book came to
him one day in art class when he had the insight that modern art had
become nothing more than than a game of style, "...like clothes to be
taken off or put on without the slightest regard to the inner
feelings.."  He says," The problem of art is inextricably involved with
the problem of history, and the problem of history with the unfathomed
depths of man's own nature.  A rare art historian like Wihelm Worringer
revealed to me that art was generated by spiritual forces, and that art
history properly understood was a "history of the human psyche and its
forms of expression.."

Reading this I realized that what he was saying related to our rambling
debate about, science, religion, spirituality, consciousness,etc.  The
meaning of "Transformative Vision" for Arguelles, is that our survival
depends on a "transcendance of the conflicts we call history..by the
integration of 'psyche' ( right hemisphere ) and 'techne' ( left
hemisphere ).." though these two aspects of human nature can function
independently of each other, the degree of their independence defines
the degree of human imbalance, sickness or insanity.  In actuality they
cannot be understoon separately.  Being whole, the mutual self-
definition comprizes the basis of the psychophysical point of view.."

"Should the idology and mentality of history prevail, then the
transformative vision may have to continue as a strange underground
development..a rhythm more powerful and inexorable than the rhythm of
human reason is sweeping through the human race...this rhythm is the
heartbeat of the transformative vision."

On page 49 of the book Arguelles gives wonderful description of the
meaning of the Gothic cathedral in medieval life.

"..culture is the universally understoood means of expression of a
given social organism; the more highly integrated the culture, the more
conscious and universally shared are the means and meaning of
expression.  The great craftsmen and builders of Gothic Europe were
able to bring about a high level of cultural integration by the
construction of cathedrals.  The process of erecting these great
edifices offered an opportunity for universal participation, uniting
all the arts, beliefs and spiritual practices of the society in one
tangible whole."

"The case of mid-eithteenth-century Europe is quite the reverse; the
arts were no longer coalesced into one work but fragmented into easel
painting, chamber music, novels, and secular architecture. Furthermore,
the craft/guild system was under fatal attack from two sides - the
usurpation of the arts by the academies, and the mechanization of life
that was about to become universal, thus dispensing with the need
for "handicrafts"...the means of culture  were now left in the hands of
a few privileged people only shows that the rest of the people, "the
masses", were culturally deprived.  Not only would the masses become
desensitized and brutalized as a result, but the very meaning of life
could no longer be coherently expressed and transmitted.  This, then,
is the bane of mechanized civilization."

"Cultural disintegration, which manifests socially in increasing modes
of specialization- professionalism -has been aggravated by universal
sensory fragmentation. Again, the Gothic cathedral provides an example
of an aesthetic process whose end is achieved when a participant is
able to experience a state of psychosensorial interfusion.  The effect
of different sensory agents acting upon the participant simultaneously
transfuses and uplifts the whole being, evoking a transcendant
experience.  With the onset of the Renaissance this total experience
became much more the exception than the rule.  One may recall certain
multimedia events,  such as the synchronization of water sculpture,
lights, and music by the great Baroque artist Gianlorenzo Bernini who
was familiar with the nature of mystical experience."

"By and large, from the sixteenth century onward Europeans suffered
increasing sensorial frgamentation, an inevitable result of the
mechanization of consciousness, which naturally limits the organism to
a splintered, sequential point of view.."

Gene  J

   






Topics suitable for discussion in this e-list can be found at:
http://www.luckymojo.com/sacredland.html

To UNsubscribe, send email to:
sacredlandscapelist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sacredlandscapelist/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    sacredlandscapelist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




 

#5826 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:50 am
Subject: Fwd: eSkeptic: The Privileged Planet
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 
 

eSkeptic: the email newsletter of the Skeptics Society

Monday, January 9th, 2006  |  ISSN 1556-5696

This Evening!
Michael Shermer on Art Bell’s
Coast to Coast AM radio show

Monday, January 9th
11pm—2am, Pacific Standard Time

Tonight, Michael Shermer will appear on Art Bell‘s Coast to Coast AM national radio show. Topics to be discussed include: UFOs and alien abductions, psuedoscience and the paranormal, evolution and intelligent design, cults, science and religion. You can tune in live on AM radio stations across the US (free), XM radio channel 165, or you can pay for a subscription to the podcast from the Coast to Coast AM website.


Call for Assistance for Jared Diamond Event

The Skeptics Society needs help promoting a Caltech event with Jared Diamond, on Sunday, January 22nd. If you live in Southern California and are interested in lending a hand, please contact Michael Shermer at mshermer@.... (More info about this event will be in the next eSkeptic.)


In this week’s eSkeptic, we present Charles G. Lambdin’s review of the film “The Privileged Planet: The Search for Purpose in the Universe”

Charles G. Lambdin is a graduate student at Wichita State University, where he teaches psychology and research methods.


Creationism by Any Other Name

film review by Charles G. Lambdin

Intelligent design (ID) is a dressing up of the old “argument from design,” with technical jargon added to lend a thin veneer of scientific credibility. ID advocates’ opportunistic tactics, which have more in common with politicians than scientists, have been described as the “wedge” strategy — an attempt to gain academic acceptance by maintaining a presence in academic and scientific venues.

A prime example of this is the film The Privileged Planet, a contemporary classic of pseudoscience. The film was produced by the Discovery Institute, a conservative think-tank whose expressed goal is the promotion of Intelligent Design. The film gained a degree of notoriety when the Discovery Institute boasted that The Privileged Planet was screening at none other than the Smithsonian Institute itself, with the implied endorsement of that august body. In fact, the Discovery Institute donated $16,000 to the Smithsonian, which by policy allowed the Discovery Institute to co-sponsor the film and to use the Smithsonian’s Baird Auditorium for its viewing. This naturally sparked an outcry from the scientific community, which led the Smithsonian to refuse the $16,000 donation, thereby withdrawing their co-sponsorship and any hint of endorsement. Although the Smithsonian was still contractually obliged to show the film, the screening ended up being an invitation-only event attended by ID sympathizers.

The film revolves around the authors of the book of the same title, Guillermo Gonzalez, an astrobiologist, and Jay W. Richards, a philosopher at the Discovery Institute (the book is published by Regnery). Their argument is that life is too improbably to have come about by chance, therefore there must be an Intelligent Designer. The film reviews the standard arguments for the necessary conditions that allow life to exist on Earth or elsewhere, such as that the planet must be in the “Goldilocks Zone” — the distance at which a planet reaches habitable temperatures. The film claims that if the earth were merely five percent closer to the sun temperatures would approach 900° Fahrenheit and all the water would boil off the earth. The type of star also has to be just right. If the sun were smaller, then the “Goldilocks Zone” would have to be closer. But if the earth were closer to the sun then its rotation rate might become fixed with its rate of orbit (as with our own moon), such that the same side of the earth would always face the sun, creating two lifeless sides — a cold, frozen side and a scorched, seared side. (The film ignores the transitional twilight zone between the dark side and light side in which life might exist.) Plate tectonics must diligently operate to recycle carbon; there must be an atmosphere rich in oxygen, liquid water, and a circulating, liquid iron core generating a magnetic field to deflect solar radiation. (Never mind the microbes found at thermal vents in the ocean or at significant depths in mines — which do not require oxygen.) The planet must be orbited by a large moon — our moon stabilizes the tilt of the earth, keeping the seasons temperate. The planet must be surrounded by larger planets in order to protect it from gigantic space debris that are absorbed by these larger planets before they can strike the earth. And the list goes on and on.

In short, a whole lot of things have to be a precise way in order for a planet to be habitable, and all of these factors must be present in order for life to exist on any planet. (Again, it could be argued that these are merely the factors that allow for a very specific type of life and are not even necessary for a number of earth creatures). In The Privileged Planet it is stated that if we assume that the odds of each of these factors occurring are the same, and if we fix these odds at one out of ten, then the odds of all of these conditions coming together in one location are 1/1,000,000,000,000,000. These odds are so remote, the authors conclude, that it is unlikely that a planet would be habitable due to chance alone, and so the best inference is design.

These odds might be remote, to be sure, but there are probably a lot of planets! This simple point is glossed over in the film. Interestingly, the film gives an estimate of more than 10,000 billion billion star systems in the universe, and 10 billion stars in the Milky Way galaxy. Oddly, no one in The Privileged Planet bothers to put such estimates together with the film’s 1/1,000,000,000,000,000 odds of habitability. To do so, we must estimate how many planets there are in the universe: If we assume that the odds that a star system contains one planet are one in a million and that there are 10,000 billion billion star systems, this leaves us with ten million billion planets in the cosmos.

Now if, as stated in The Privileged Planet, the odds that a planet is habitable are 1/1,000,000,000,000,000, or .0000000000001%, then contrary to what is claimed in the film it would be expected that there should be 10 habitable planets due to chance alone (10,000,000,000,000,000 x .000000000000001). However, the one-in-a-million odds that a star system contains at least one planet is a very conservative estimate! Astronomers who search for extra-solar planets find that about one in ten star systems they search contain planets. Using Gonzalez and Richard’s own odds of habitability, this suggests that there may be one billion habitable planets due to chance alone. And even this may be a conservative estimate! The odds of habitability presented in The Privileged Planet are, after all, rather arbitrary given how they were computed. To illustrate, scientists from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, in a paper on “Habitable Zones and the Number of Habitable Planets in the Milky Way,” using only part of the Drake equation estimate that there are 48 million habitable planets in our galaxy alone (http://biospace.nw.ru/astrobiology/Articles2002/Astrobio_franck_22_24.pdf). If this figure is in any way representative of other galaxies, then the number of habitable planets in the universe would be staggering.

The other arguments in The Privileged Planet amount to pointing to coincidences and citing them as evidence of a divine plan, which is, of course, a non sequitur. For example, it is suggested that Saturn and Jupiter were placed where they are so as to protect the earth from asteroids. (This is really no different from Voltaire’s joke in Candide that the Anabaptist drowned in the bay, therefore the bay was created so that the Anabaptist could drown in it! Everything works out for the best in this best of all possible worlds.)

Another claim made in the film is that the position of the earth in the solar system makes for perfect solar eclipses. It is only the perfect solar eclipse that has revealed the atmosphere of the sun to us and further allowed us to confirm Einstein’s idea that the light rays of other stars are bent by the sun’s gravity. A perfect solar eclipse would not be observable from other planets in the solar system. How can it be that the one place in the solar system from which these discoveries could have been made just happens to be the one place where there are observers to make them? Furthermore, one of the factors that contributes to the habitability of earth is its location in the galaxy. This location also makes an ideal place to do astronomy (there’s not a lot to block our view). From this, Gonzalez and Richards argue that there is “a high correlation between life and discovery.” The same factors that contribute to the earth’s habitability also seem to make us able to do science! It must therefore be the case that we were designed so that we could understand the universe and that the universe was designed such that it could be understood by us. (The subtitle of the book is “How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery.”)

I was baffled every time it was stated that there “is a high correlation between life and discovery.” I wanted to shout, “Yeah it’s high; it’s perfect; it’s a correlation of one!” It does not make sense to talk about science and discovery as though they could occur independently of life, which is done in the film by suggesting that the correlation “between life and discovery” could be anything less than perfect. If there is no life, no conscious beings, then who or what is doing the discovering? How can “discovery” exist without discoverers?

The thesis of The Privileged Planet is no different than the classic case of Presidential coincidences: Abraham Lincoln was elected to congress in 1846. John F. Kennedy was elected to congress in 1946. Lincoln was elected President in 1860, Kennedy in 1960. Both of their last names have seven letters. Both of their wives experienced the loss of child in the White House. Both were shot in the head on a Friday. Both were assassinated by Southerners and succeeded by Southerners. Lincoln was succeeded by Andrew Johnson, who was born in 1808. Kennedy was succeeded by Lyndon Johnson, who was born in 1908. Lincoln’s assassin, John Wilkes Booth, has 15 letters in his name. Kennedy’s assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, has 15 letters in his name. Both assassins were known by three names. Booth was born in 1839, Oswald in 1939. As I am unable to imagine otherwise, these coincidences are too great to have occurred due to chance alone, so there must be some Intelligent Assassin behind it. Thus runs the reasoning throughout The Privileged Planet.

Throughout the film much is made of the fact that we can “do” science at all. Why is it so surprising that we can figure things out about the universe? Such statements as, “We evolved to hunt and gather food, not to do astronomy,” display a complete lack of understanding of evolution. It doesn’t really make sense to say that we evolved to do anything. We just evolved. There is no reason to think that evolution is a teleological process and that we are evolving into anything in particular. Similarly, the statement that, “It is just so astounding that we can even understand the universe at all,” is not an observation; it’s a value judgment. If an occurrence seems near impossible to you, this only really says something about your beliefs regarding nature. (Why should one expect things to be other than the way they happen to be?) Coincidences are not evidence of mystical forces. Statistically unlikely events are, in the long run, likely to occur: There are 280 million people in America, therefore one-in-a-million odds will happen 280 times a day in America. It does not make sense to say that 280 miracles happen a day in the United States, any more than it should seem miraculous that someone will win a lottery.

Ignoring such facts, The Privileged Planet repeatedly beats into the viewer that the coincidences in nature require an Intelligent Designer. Intelligent Design theory begs the question by not having set an objective criterion for what is “too rare” or “too unlikely” or “too complex.” As Schopenhauer said, nothing more is implied by a premise than what is already contained in it. To say that habitable planets are uncommon only implies that they’re rare, not that they’re designed. And as we have seen, they may not be that rare.


eSkeptic is a free, public newsletter published (almost) weekly by the Skeptics Society. Contents are Copyright © 2005 Michael Shermer, the Skeptics Society, and the authors and artists. Permission is granted to print, distribute, and post with proper citation and acknowledgment. Contact us at skepticssociety@.... | This webpage is coded by Rocketday Arts to W3C compliant XHTML 1.1, adhering to accessibility guidelines set forth by the W3C’s Web Accessibility Initiative and US Section 508, using Dublin Core RDF metadata. | Subscribe to eSkeptic by sending an email to join-skeptics@.... Unsubscribe by sending an email to leave-skeptics@.... | Browse, search, and read the eSkeptic archives online. Read other articles, order books, cds and dvds, browse announcements of events, and at subscribe to Skeptic magazine at www.skeptic.com.

#5827 From: "Daniel N. Washburn" <danw@...>
Date: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:47 pm
Subject: MOD: Re: [sl] New List
danw888
Send Email Send Email
 
I got home from a long week-end in West Virginia (unfortunately not at
the Golden Palace) to find Mike's 'new list' message on my machine.

It certainly looks to me from the message as if Mike wants to split the
SL list and draw off participants to his new list, ad qadratum.   He
certainly has the right to form any list he likes, but this message
feels like an abuse of SL hospitality to me.  To confuse things, it
seems he intends to stay on SL.

Mike, you are perfectly welcome to stay, but please coordinate any
future reference to Ad Qadratum with me.  You have made your
announcement, please limit it to that.  Any other invitations to join
your new list will be considered an abuse of hospitality and I will ban
you from SL.

Please make any replies to this e-mail to me off list.

Moderator Dan



mikebispham@... wrote:

> Hi All
>
>
>
> Feeling that a lot of the time my ways of thinking are discomforting
> to people here, and that most members of the list are largely
> driven by issues of belief that are not relevant to my own interests
> and approach, I have set up a new list to provide a place for more
> secularly based discussions of the topics we originally set out to
> explore.
>
>
>
> The subject list is very similar to that at sl, but with 'sacred'
> removed to facilitate discussions that otherwise founder on
> differences of core belief.  The chief focus has been restored to
> latent order in the natural world, approachable through mathematics,
> and the employment of mathematics in human artifacts.
>
>
>
> The broad aims of the list are encompassed by it's name, 'Ad
> Quadratum,' which refers first to one of the two design and
> construction methods used by (at least some of) the cathedral builders
> of Europe.  I envisage critical discussions centred on the
> relationships that emerge between the four poles of Mathematics,
> Nature, Human Experience, and Cultural Artifacts.
>
>
>
> I could expand on that a little by saying I want to explore
> mathematics in historical art and artifacts; exploring the ways in
> which human understanding of the world has developed by recognising
> mathematical patterns in nature, and seeking to understand and utilize
> them.
>
>
>
> A fuller outline of aims and topics appears at the homepage.  I
> haven't actually got a topic list together yet.
>
>
>
> I will also, as usual, be keeping an eye out for philosophical and
> linguistic traps - examining ways of knowing from a philosophical
> perspective; and generally engaging in conversations that will amuse,
> challenge, or enlighten us all in some way.
>
>
>
> If you'd like to join the group, head on over to:
>
>
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AdQuad/
>
>
>
> Hope to see some of you there,
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Mike
>
>
> Topics suitable for discussion in this e-list can be found at:
> http://www.luckymojo.com/sacredland.html
>
> To UNsubscribe, send email to:
> sacredlandscapelist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>     *  Visit your group "sacredlandscapelist
>       <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sacredlandscapelist>" on the web.
>
>     *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>        sacredlandscapelist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>      
<mailto:sacredlandscapelist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
>     *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

#5828 From: mikebispham@...
Date: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:40 am
Subject: Dawkins on Religion
mikebispham
Send Email Send Email
 
Well,
 
Richard Dawkins' 1st programme (more-or-less faith vs reason) was great, and there's been some insightful comment in the press... but is anyone interested?
 
Mike

#5829 From: "Mark Swaney" <mswaney@...>
Date: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:15 pm
Subject: check
swaney342001
Send Email Send Email
 

Hello SL list – is anyone out there?

 



Messages 5800 - 5829 of 7668   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help