> [mailto:sasxsek@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of narfee

> What is the difference between
>
> mo iesxuan.
>
> and
>
> mo uanxies.

Actually the first would be saying "I am hunger." To say "I am
hungry" would be "mo uan ies" (lit: I want {verb} eat {object}).
Sasxsek compounds are head last, but declarative sentences are
SVO.


> dumxmacino
>
> and
>
> macinxdumo
>
>
> Do we have to base ourselves on the english language ? like...
I
> want-eat... or there's a specific order like I eat-want.


> Hunger is iesxuan wich means I eat-want

"want" as a noun head with "eat" modifying it so that it refers
to a specific type of desire, that is the desire to eat.



> but computer is dumxmacino wich is think-machine...

Again, head last. Semantically though this could work as
"think-machine" or "machine-think-er". I suppose at this point
the selection of the head would be more emphatic.

BTW: It would be "dume" (=thinker), not "dumo" (=thought).
"-e" is the agentive noun. The best way to explain "-o" would
be to loosely relate it to the Mandarin "-zi (?)", and it could
correspond to several differnt endings of E-o like "-ado",
"-ido" or "-ajxo".