Last week I posted a link to a page showing that a USM applied to an image scanned with ICE was indistinguishable in sharpness from a picture not using ICE. I...
East75th
east75th@...
May 1, 2000 9:30 am
9568
Hi Doug The Pre-scan uses the scanner with both a different resolution and physical light level capture sensor difference. Additionally software like...
Phil.Lippincott
phil.lippincott@...
May 1, 2000 6:11 pm
9569
Folks, I need to scan some 6x45 negatives for use as web images only. I realize that the dimension of the final image size has a LOT to do with the resolution...
Colin Povey
cpovey@...
May 1, 2000 11:33 pm
9570
This was sent to me by Digital Darkroom located in Jacksonville, Florida - thought it might be of interest to the list. --steve bohne UMAX SCANNING UPDATE &...
Steve Bohne
smbohne@...
May 1, 2000 11:33 pm
9571
Generally, if the photo program you use does nothing else at all, here how to figure it out: Assume about a 96dpi for screen. If you want a 3x2" wide image on...
David Chien
chiendh@...
May 2, 2000 12:12 am
9572
Today, in my pile of junk mail, I found a catalog from a company called "Publishing Perfection." They are selling the H-P ScanJet 6300C, and the headline of...
Julian Vrieslander
julianv@...
May 2, 2000 1:03 am
9573
... Regardless of the Neg or final size, 72dpi is the standard for on-screen viewing. Wm. "Bill" Brady, Harwood MD 38°51'30"N 76°41'00"W - Who was wrong: ...
Bill Brady
wmbrady@...
May 2, 2000 1:25 am
9574
I guess you might need to add a little memory, too. Paul ... - *Please* turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines....
Amundson
amundson@...
May 2, 2000 3:32 pm
9575
Still sticking to that 72 dpi, eh? ;-) For some reason, it doesn't work well for me when I test images on my monitor. I find 96 dpi works better, both with my...
Arthur Entlich
artistic@...
May 2, 2000 3:32 pm
9576
If Publishing Perfection is up to their usual tricks, and if that scanner is front page with a great price, you can be sure they have approximately 1,000,000...
Arthur Entlich
artistic@...
May 2, 2000 3:33 pm
9577
... A non-answer answer. Yes, 72dpi is the "assumed" resolution standard used in many graphics programs for on-screen images. However, taken by itself, it is...
Michael Friedlander
mfriedlander@...
May 2, 2000 3:35 pm
9578
... .... So I give up, how does one GET PowerColor for a supported UMax "professional" scanner (PowerLookIII, Mirage II, etc.) which originally shipped with...
Daniel Bridgman
dbridgma@...
May 2, 2000 6:50 pm
9579
Gotta tell you all--I just came from a Web design seminar, and the speakers worked on PC's-- and all THREE speaker used the 72dpi standard. smb ... -- Do you...
Steve Bohne
smbohne@...
May 2, 2000 6:51 pm
9580
I've been trying to stay out of this discussion as we beat it to death about 3 months ago. When you do the math, 75dpi is correct for most users. Say the ...
gary
gsellani@...
May 2, 2000 9:15 pm
9581
... From: "Steve Bohne" <smbohne@...> To: <scan@...> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 5:08 AM Subject: Re: What resolution to use? ... speakers ......
bjs
bjs1@...
May 2, 2000 9:23 pm
9582
Well, if a simple figure doesn't suffice, here's a simple equation that'll get you a figure customized to your display setup: (horizonal screen resolution...
David Chien
chiendh@...
May 2, 2000 10:17 pm
9583
Keep in mind, most Web Design classes will instruct you to design for that 640x480 monitor . . . smb ... - *Please* turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted...
Steve Bohne
smbohne@...
May 2, 2000 10:57 pm
9584
Yep, and that's for the 10% of users (according to my site specs) that still use 640x480. Everyone else, the 90% majority of users, are running above 640x480...
David Chien
chiendh@...
May 3, 2000 1:54 am
9585
Since I'm a photographer, I do NOT design a 2nd site for clowns with "graphics turned off". However, since most people who search my site are households (and...
Steve Bohne
smbohne@...
May 3, 2000 12:33 pm
9586
I'm using a Nikon Ls 2000. Recently I started getting a glow off areas of different contrast. Say a white sign on a red background, the white sign bleeds into...
Johnsimage@...
May 3, 2000 1:03 pm
9587
I have the same scanner and have seen it. I have some shots of kids in white shirts against a dark background and the white really spreads. I control it by...
Larry Becker
LDBecker@...
May 3, 2000 4:55 pm
9588
John: Ah! the dreaded CCD Pixel Blooming, lens flare, or whatever you want to call it. Almost all CCD scanners have this problem to a greater or lesser degree ...
Mark Romine
klick3@...
May 3, 2000 4:56 pm
9589
Hi Steve The size of the monitor does not of course set the screen resolution. The video board settings do. Since the old CGA (on PC) and Mac II first...
Phil.Lippincott
phil.lippincott@...
May 3, 2000 6:53 pm
9590
Larry: ... Look carefully at the edges of image at 100% in Photoshop, more than likely it is still there although your reduction of contrast may have helped. I...
Mark Romine
klick3@...
May 3, 2000 7:03 pm
9591
will be less of a problem. My first 19" monitor was nearly $2000; today they can be had as low as $500. Actually, much lower. ...
chiendh@...
May 3, 2000 7:05 pm
9592
It's CCD flare. The only way to avoid it is to use a drum scanner or a professional CCD scanner such as one of the Scitex scanners. On the LS-2000 you can...
East75th
east75th@...
May 3, 2000 7:08 pm
9593
In a message dated 5/3/2000 1:11:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, klick3@... writes: << Ah! the dreaded CCD Pixel Blooming, lens flare, or whatever you want to...
Johnsimage@...
May 3, 2000 8:30 pm
9594
BTW, Hate to pile on the bad news, but the effects of CCD flare aren't limited to high contrast areas, it's throughout the image. Fortunately it's not as bad...
East75th
east75th@...
May 3, 2000 8:32 pm
9595
John: ... Not that I am aware of, I have seen others ask the same question here before but I do not recall anyone coming up with such a publication, maybe some...
Mark Romine
klick3@...
May 3, 2000 9:56 pm
9596
Dane: ... Your right, I have seen it in many normal contrast images as well. For many unless they look at their files carefully at say 100% in PS they may...