Hi
I am trying to find information on the maximum route table entry/size
for a sidewinder 2150e running v7. Looking to run OSPF with approx
2000 routes.
Secure Computing has only said there is no Hard Cap but I haven't been
able to get anymore information other than that.
Any help would be appreciated.
I recently ran into an error that support has never heard of. If you power down a Sidewinder 7 running on this hardware and don't do it properly (shutdown -r now, shutdown -h now, etc..) the system boots and freezes on the following error:
The numbers in question, (128, 141, 3, etc.) change with every reboot, but the error is generally the same.
If I choose option 4(boot from serial console) I can get to a prompt where I would generally run an fsck command or something, but that does work, even with the switches.
I get this same error when I choose the Emergency Mode option.
Any ideas here? I would rather learn what causes this and how to fix it. I know I can always re=install.
Remember that the man cf pages give a lot of information
and if you want to look at anything in particular regarding cf, then
just do man cf_server or whatever the convention or area
is.
From:
sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Mike Swier Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 7:10 PM To: sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [sidewinder-users] (unknown)
I am looking for a way to get
the policies (firewall/vpn rules or more)
out of the box to do offline analysis. Is there any way to get those --
like saving to a file or accessing from database if they are maining in
db or any other way I did not think of.. CheckPoint supports CMPI
connection to get the firewall policies out of the box for further
analysis or reporting. I am looking for similar ways for Sidewinder
also. Does any one done any similar work before.. please let me know
new ways to do this...
Thanks & Regards,
Sridhar P
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sidewinder-users/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sidewinder-users/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:sidewinder-users-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:sidewinder-users-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
sidewinder-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
I am looking for a way to get the policies (firewall/vpn rules or more) out of the box to do offline analysis. Is there any way to get those -- like saving to a file or accessing from database if they are maining in db or any other way I did not think of.. CheckPoint supports CMPI connection to get the firewall policies out of the box for further analysis or reporting. I am looking for similar ways for Sidewinder also. Does any one done any similar work before.. please let me know new ways to do this...
Thanks & Regards,
Sridhar P
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go
to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sidewinder-users/
<*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sidewinder-users/join (Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email: mailto:sidewinder-users-digest@yahoogroups.com mailto:sidewinder-users-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: sidewinder-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
I am looking for a way to get the policies (firewall/vpn rules or more)
out of the box to do offline analysis. Is there any way to get those --
like saving to a file or accessing from database if they are maining in
db or any other way I did not think of.. CheckPoint supports CMPI
connection to get the firewall policies out of the box for further
analysis or reporting. I am looking for similar ways for Sidewinder
also. Does any one done any similar work before.. please let me know
new ways to do this...
Thanks & Regards,
Sridhar P
Sidewinder 4.0 had Xeyes.
--- In sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com, "K K" <kkadow@...> wrote:
>
> On 2/3/08, Justin Beeler (JBEELER.COM) <justin@...> wrote:
> > Scott is there any plan on a web interface for the Sidewinder GUI?
> > or are you guys sticking with a strickly Winblowz interface?
>
> Personally, I'm not a fan of web-based firewall management.
>
> OTOH, I miss the old X cobra client.
>
>
> Kevin
>
np, sorry it couldn't be more positive...next time...
fakhruddin_seth <fakhruddin_seth@...> wrote:
hi scott, thanks for you answer.
--- In sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com, Scott Montgomery <scottyva@...> wrote: > > No IPX support is available on any Sidewinder appliance of any version. > > S > > fakhruddin_seth <fakhruddin_seth@...> wrote: Hi Guys, > Can any one share
info about IPX support in Sidewinder 4150 G2 > Appliance, is it available or not? > thanks in advance. > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. >
hi scott,
thanks for you answer.
--- In sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com, Scott Montgomery
<scottyva@...> wrote:
>
> No IPX support is available on any Sidewinder appliance of any
version.
>
> S
>
> fakhruddin_seth <fakhruddin_seth@...>
wrote: Hi Guys,
> Can any one share info about IPX support in Sidewinder 4150 G2
> Appliance, is it available or not?
> thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo!
Search.
>
On 2/3/08, Justin Beeler (JBEELER.COM) <justin@...> wrote:
> Scott is there any plan on a web interface for the Sidewinder GUI?
> or are you guys sticking with a strickly Winblowz interface?
Personally, I'm not a fan of web-based firewall management.
OTOH, I miss the old X cobra client.
Kevin
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Justin Beeler (JBEELER.COM)
Website URL: http://www.jbeeler.com
- UNIX IS user friendly.....it's just picky about who it chooses to be friends with.
"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I forgot to mention - we're currently running version 6.1.2.03.
Frank
From: sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Fiamingo, Frank Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 11:48 AM To: sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com Subject: [sidewinder-users] Citrix Proxy Status
Sometime ago after an upgrade to Sidewinder G2 the Citrix proxy no longer worked properly, and we had to improvise with a with a generic TCP proxy and UDP filter to allow the traffic to pass properly.
Has the Citrix proxy been fixed? Does it now work properly for both the TCP and UDP connections?
Sometime ago after an upgrade to Sidewinder G2 the Citrix proxy no longer worked properly, and we had to improvise with a with a generic TCP proxy and UDP filter to allow the traffic to pass properly.
Has the Citrix proxy been fixed? Does it now work properly for both the TCP and UDP connections?
I missed the part in the crontab man page the you need to escape the
% with a \ so now it works.
Mike
-- In sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com, "Mike" <ramses_the_1st@...>
wrote:
>
> I am trying to get a cron job going to do a config backup of my EM
> server and I am running into a strange issue. Here is the beginning
of
> the command:
>
> /usr/sbin/cf config backup loc=remote filename=fwbackup`date +%y%m%
d`
> directory=/data/fwbackup/
>
> The job will run just fine from the command line, but when run from
> cron it blows up using the date function. The cron log looks like
this:
>
> /usr/sbin/cf config backup loc=remote filename=fwbackup`date +)
>
> Is there a know issue with using the date function in cron? It just
> seems odd that it will work from the cli but not in cron.
>
> Mike
>
I am trying to get a cron job going to do a config backup of my EM
server and I am running into a strange issue. Here is the beginning of
the command:
/usr/sbin/cf config backup loc=remote filename=fwbackup`date +%y%m%d`
directory=/data/fwbackup/
The job will run just fine from the command line, but when run from
cron it blows up using the date function. The cron log looks like this:
/usr/sbin/cf config backup loc=remote filename=fwbackup`date +)
Is there a know issue with using the date function in cron? It just
seems odd that it will work from the cli but not in cron.
Mike
> On 10/26/07, Matthew <matthew.harvey@usdoj.gov> > wrote: > > > Does anyone know how to perform a packet-level > capture on an interface > > on a G2? To create a PCAP or similar file, that > is. > > This is pretty easy. You can use tcpdump to monitor > interfaces. > > Just `man tcpdump`. >
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
tcpdump -npi [ifname, exp0 for example] -X -s220
You can throw other parameters in such as:
host 100.2.3.4 and port 80
There are some other commands that you can use to
filter it down to a specific stream as well if that
isn't good enough.
If I am looking for something specific, I will
redirect it to a file with:
> /home/dump.txt
for example and then grep for whatever I am looking
for.
- F
--- Eric Pancer <epancer@...> wrote:
> On 10/26/07, Matthew <matthew.harvey@...>
> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know how to perform a packet-level
> capture on an interface
> > on a G2? To create a PCAP or similar file, that
> is.
>
> This is pretty easy. You can use tcpdump to monitor
> interfaces.
>
> Just `man tcpdump`.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
As mentioned before, use tcpdump. If you would like to write the
capture to a file, for viewing at a later time with tcpdump or
wireshark, simply use the -w flag.
On 10/26/07, Matthew <matthew.harvey@...> wrote:
> Does anyone know how to perform a packet-level capture on an interface
> on a G2? To create a PCAP or similar file, that is.
This is pretty easy. You can use tcpdump to monitor interfaces.
Just `man tcpdump`.
You can have up to 14 interfaces on the mid models and
go up to 26 on the big boxes.
Since the Sidewinder O.S. [secure o.s.] is extremely
locked down, all hardware drivers have to be added to
the O.S. It's not like you can just add your own
drivers.
What this meant is that many, many, time someone would
buy a server that had components that were not on the
HCL.
What this meant was down time for the firewall and
also hours and hours of support calls to try and
troubleshoot problems for hours to track down a bad
nic card, etc.
With the appliance, all of that down time goes away
because you know it will just work. I did an install
once and the server came with 3com 905-c's which were
not supported. The model that did work was the 905-b,
which didn't have netbios blasts built into the nic.
Had to burn two days waiting for the right part to
show up.
--- Daniel Sichel <daniels@...> wrote:
> I have not yet seen version 7, but it sounds pretty
> good. I hear the GUI
> is or soon will be Java based which makes me
> hesitant, Java always
> seems slow and kludgy with lots of annoying bugs in
> user interfaces. I
> complained bitterly for years over the PHP issues,
> and now in 6.1x they
> have it really well executed IMHO. I do have one
> question, what is the
> maximum number of interfaces in one of their
> appliances? I have eight
> interfaces on my appliance, all in use, and it
> looks like I will soon
> be needing a ninth. If they supported more
> interfaces that would be a
> compelling reason to upgrade.
>
>
>
> Thanks for all the comments about this. I am not
> really sure how I feel
> about the end of life issue. On the one hand I
> understand Secure needs
> to generate revenue and control costs which dictates
> older issue
> equipment going end of life, but on the other hand,
> this type of
> upgrade is expensive and disruptive, and I wonder
> about what is owed
> the end user who drops tens of thousands of dollars
> into a firewall then
> pays support too. As I often have said, it's one
> thing when I pay $79
> bucks for an off the shelf device at Best Buy and
> call support, but
> totally another when I pay these prices. This is
> why I WON"T USE
> SYMANTEC PRODUCTS. I guess I feel like Secure
> support is generally
> very, very good but their product policies leave
> something to be
> desired. It's like Winston Churchill's description
> of democracy,
> "...It's the worst form of government in the world
> -except all the
> others."
>
>
>
> Daniel Sichel, CCNP, MCSE
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Ponderosa Telephone (559) 868-6367
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
One very nice think about them using a Java based GUI is that those of
us that detest Windows can go back to administrating our "*NIX
firewall" with a *NIX box! That has been a huge thorn in our side
since we switched from Gauntlet to Sidewinder G2. Kudos on SCC for
doing this!
Justin
Daniel Sichel wrote:
I have not yet seen version 7, but it sounds
pretty good. I
hear the GUI is or soon will be Java based which makes me hesitant,
Java
always seems slow and kludgy with lots of annoying bugs in user
interfaces. I
complained bitterly for years over the PHP issues, and now in 6.1x
they
have it really well executed IMHO. I do have one question, what is
the maximum number of interfaces in one of their appliances? I have
eight
interfaces on my appliance, all in use, and it looks like I will soon
be
needing a ninth. If they supported more interfaces that would be a
compelling reason to upgrade.
Thanks for all the comments about this. I am
not
really sure how I feel about the end of life issue. On the one hand I
understand Secure needs to generate revenue and control costs which
dictates
older issue equipment going end of life, but on the other hand, this
type
of upgrade is expensive and disruptive, and I wonder about what is
owed
the end user who drops tens of thousands of dollars into a firewall
then pays
support too. As I often have said, it’s one thing when I pay $79 bucks
for an off the shelf device at Best Buy and call support, but totally
another
when I pay these prices. This is why I WON”T USE SYMANTEC PRODUCTS.
I guess I feel like Secure support is generally very, very good but
their
product policies leave something to be desired. It’s like Winston
Churchill’s description of democracy, “…It’s the worst
form of government in the world –except all the others.”
I have not yet seen version 7, but it sounds pretty good. I
hear the GUI is or soon will be Java based which makes me hesitant, Java
always seems slow and kludgy with lots of annoying bugs in user interfaces. I
complained bitterly for years over the PHP issues, and now in 6.1x they
have it really well executed IMHO. I do have one question, what is
the maximum number of interfaces in one of their appliances? I have eight
interfaces on my appliance, all in use, and it looks like I will soon be
needing a ninth. If they supported more interfaces that would be a
compelling reason to upgrade.
Thanks for all the comments about this. I am not
really sure how I feel about the end of life issue. On the one hand I
understand Secure needs to generate revenue and control costs which dictates
older issue equipment going end of life, but on the other hand, this type
of upgrade is expensive and disruptive, and I wonder about what is owed
the end user who drops tens of thousands of dollars into a firewall then pays
support too. As I often have said, it’s one thing when I pay $79 bucks
for an off the shelf device at Best Buy and call support, but totally another
when I pay these prices. This is why I WON”T USE SYMANTEC PRODUCTS.
I guess I feel like Secure support is generally very, very good but their
product policies leave something to be desired. It’s like Winston
Churchill’s description of democracy, “…It’s the worst
form of government in the world –except all the others.”
Dan,
Have you seen Sidewinder v. 7? That is what's running on the new
appliances. The single panel rule screen is awesome and your proxies
and ip filters are all in a single rule set. Also, you do not have
to run and turn a proxy on before making the acl. Simply creating
the rule opens the proxy/server that you trying to control.
- F
--- In sidewinder-users@yahoogroups.com, "Justin Beeler
(JBEELER.COM)" <justin@...> wrote:
>
> Dan,
>
> Stick with 6.1.2x and your current server(s). If what you have
works
> for you then stick with it! Since a Sidewinder has "never been
> breached" then you have nothing to worry about. Of course you
won't be
> able to get upgrades or anything, but you'll still be very well
> protected. The 6.1.2.x platform is very stable, very reliable, and
very
> secure. The old saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" comes to
> mind. I'm sure SCC will dislike my response, but it is what it is
my
> friend. I know of several Sidewinder 5.x boxes and even Gauntlet
5.x
> and 6.0 boxes still alive, well, and doing a very good job at
security.
>
> Justin Beeler
>
> Scott Montgomery wrote:
> > Hi, Dan:
> >
> > Unfortunately there are only two real options here today. One is
to
> > run without support, but I can't really advise it. The kb, phone
> > support, upgrade discounts, access to patches and updated
versions,
> > etc is tied to a current support agreement. The other is a
migration
> > to a newer appliance. The cost is far less than list price on
the
> > appropriately sized appliance (we basically give you some
hardware
> > credit for your existing device).
> >
> > We are exploring the viability of a VMWare-enabled appliance
version
> > (basically a 'software appliance' on a CD), but it's more a
research
> > project right now than anything else. There's no commitment to a
> > delivery yet, and I have no idea what
pricing/SKU/warranty/details
> > might be like. It's basically just something we're noodling on.
> >
> > If you're happy with the Sidewinders I'd talk to sales about the
> > migration/upgrade costs - it's the best way to stay plugged into
new
> > versions and features as well as support.
> >
> > Scott
> > scott_montgomery@...
> > <mailto:scott_montgomery@...>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > */flitcraft66 <daniels@...>/* wrote:
> >
> > I have a pair of Sidwewinder 250 appliances (really they are
Dell
> > servers with a Secure Computing ROM) that aren't supported
for 7.0.
> > So, I am wondering what the future is. These appliances are
more than
> > adequate for our needs for the indefinite future and I would
hate to
> > have to retire them in 2009. So, I am wondering if somebody
from
> > product development or marketing could let us know what to
expect.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Dan Sichel
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> > Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel
today!
> >
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48517/*http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/ya
hoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7>
> >
> >
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Justin Beeler (JBEELER.COM)
> Website URL: http://www.jbeeler.com
>
> - UNIX IS user friendly.....it's just picky about who it
> chooses to be friends with.
>
> "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably
> the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
Stick with 6.1.2x and your current server(s). If what you have works
for you then stick with it! Since a Sidewinder has "never been
breached" then you have nothing to worry about. Of course you won't be
able to get upgrades or anything, but you'll still be very well
protected. The 6.1.2.x platform is very stable, very reliable, and
very secure. The old saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" comes to
mind. I'm sure SCC will dislike my response, but it is what it is my
friend. I know of several Sidewinder 5.x boxes and even Gauntlet 5.x
and 6.0 boxes still alive, well, and doing a very good job at security.
Justin Beeler
Scott Montgomery wrote:
Hi, Dan:
Unfortunately there are only two real options here today. One
is to run without support, but I can't really advise it. The kb, phone
support, upgrade discounts, access to patches and updated versions, etc
is tied to a current support agreement. The other is a migration to a
newer appliance. The cost is far less than list price on the
appropriately sized appliance (we basically give you some hardware
credit for your existing device).
We are exploring the viability of a VMWare-enabled appliance
version (basically a 'software appliance' on a CD), but it's more a
research project right now than anything else. There's no commitment
to a delivery yet, and I have no idea what pricing/SKU/warranty/details
might be like. It's basically just something we're noodling on.
If you're happy with the Sidewinders I'd talk to sales about the
migration/upgrade costs - it's the best way to stay plugged into new
versions and features as well as support.
I have a pair of Sidwewinder 250 appliances (really they are
Dell
servers with a Secure Computing ROM) that aren't supported for 7.0.
So, I am wondering what the future is. These appliances are more than
adequate for our needs for the indefinite future and I would hate to
have to retire them in 2009. So, I am wondering if somebody from
product development or marketing could let us know what to expect.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Justin Beeler (JBEELER.COM)
Website URL: http://www.jbeeler.com
- UNIX IS user friendly.....it's just picky about who it chooses to be friends with.
"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately there are only two real options here today. One is to run without support, but I can't really advise it. The kb, phone support, upgrade discounts, access to patches and updated versions, etc is tied to a current support agreement. The other is a migration to a newer appliance. The cost is far less than list price on the appropriately sized appliance (we basically give you some hardware credit for your existing device).
We are exploring the viability of a VMWare-enabled appliance version (basically a 'software appliance' on a CD), but it's more a research project right now than anything else. There's no commitment to a delivery yet, and I have no idea what pricing/SKU/warranty/details might be like. It's basically just something we're noodling on.
If you're happy with the Sidewinders I'd talk to sales about the
migration/upgrade costs - it's the best way to stay plugged into new versions and features as well as support.
I have a pair of Sidwewinder 250 appliances (really they are Dell servers with a Secure Computing ROM) that aren't supported for 7.0. So, I am wondering what the future is.
These appliances are more than adequate for our needs for the indefinite future and I would hate to have to retire them in 2009. So, I am wondering if somebody from product development or marketing could let us know what to expect.