Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
simputer · Discussions related to the Simputer
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
'open hardware' version to spread simputer ?   Topic List   < Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Reply | Forward  | 
Re: [simputer] 'open hardware' version to spread simputer ?

Hello

I'd like to add that currently it is not possible to download hardware
specs from the simputer site.
The ".tar.gz" file is not available.

I guess a wider spread of the specs, in a true "open-source" spirit,
would encourage design-houses and contract-manufacturers around the
world to join the simputer effort, to some day achieve the intended
"critical mass".

I am particularly interested in stuying the simputer as a basis for
low-cost industrial PLCs, for use in developing countries like Brazil,
where the cost of industrial automation is still prohibitive for small
manufacturers.

Best regards

Victor



easlab@... wrote:

>There was previously something written about
>licenced and/or open-hardware simputer.
>
>Confirmed by newsgroups traffic [arm & embedded etc],
>there's an increasing number of people who would like to
>do some arm hardware hacking/experimentation.
>
>Apparently there are several boards available for this,
>but many would prefer to pay more and start from a
>running system. Like in the old-days when you wanted
>to develop/investigate some new pc-based hardware
>device, you would do so on your standard pc.
>With all the advantages of the running/proven system
>available for conventient I/O.
>
>So also a version of the simputer: open box, with convenient
>external PSU connector[s] and 'extendable facilities' would
>be of great value to many and involve negligable?sp additional
>development cost to the simputer marketers.
>
>Or do the existing I/O connectors suffice ?
>Apparently not, if the developer wanted to eventually develop
>his own arm-based product, he wouldn't be comfortable
>with a 'black-box' simputer, because the conceptual distance
>to his intended product would be too great.
>
>Eg. my prefered OS/lang is ETH-S3/Oberon and there's
>apparently an arm port, which I'd like to investigate.
>The handheld Sharp Zaurus started collecting a number of
>open-software contributions [these things take a few years
>to evolve] but now it's out of production.
>
>I still maintain that simputer's failure to reach critical mass is
>caused by the Indian society/tradition failure to understand
>the dynamics of free/open contributor based
>software/applications.
>
>== Chris Glur.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>







Wed Mar 1, 2006 12:46 pm

vr@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
 | 
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

There was previously something written about licenced and/or open-hardware simputer. Confirmed by newsgroups traffic [arm & embedded etc], there's an...
easlab@...
Send Email
Feb 26, 2006
8:03 pm

Hello I'd like to add that currently it is not possible to download hardware specs from the simputer site. The ".tar.gz" file is not available. I guess a wider...
Victor Rocha
vr@...
Send Email
Mar 1, 2006
5:09 pm

Hi, Thats why simputer development is slow. Though promised the custodians of the simputer did not or could not deliver on their promise. The open source...
Arun K
arun_k_kumar
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
9:39 pm

Hi, I came across a development kit similar to that of the simputer. Please follow the link below. http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2304885763.html At $500...
Arun K
arun_k_kumar
Offline Send Email
Mar 10, 2006
2:27 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help