Excellent news! I'm looking forward to 1.1!

Otis

Benjamin Reitzammer wrote:
> Hi Otis and fellow simpyians,
>
> as the author of the module, I see problem in the dual-license. Just
> go ahead and change it. But as I just recently used my own module a
> little I discovered some, let's say "strange" things. Nothing
> dramatic. For example it's not possible to get all notes, in the
> current version. One can only search for notes. That's pretty stupid.
> ;)
> I'll make some minor changes and release an 1.1 version of the simp
> python api module. So maybe Magnus should await and use the 1.1
> release. I'll get it done within the next two days.
>
> Cheers
>
> Benjamin
>
> On 4/18/07, Otis Gospodnetic <otis@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Somebody is looking into adding support for Simpy to epilicious (an
>> extension to Epiphany, part of epiphany-extensions since 2.18) and is
>> looking into the Python REST API client (that's your work, Benjamin).
>> This is licensed under ASL 2.0. Magnus, the person looking into adding
>> the eplicious support for Simpy found that GNOME requires GPL/LGPL
>> licensed software, so now Magnus (and I) are wondering if anyone sees
>> any issues with dual-licensing (ASL + GPL) the Python client.
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/gnome-devel-list@gnome.org/msg00797.html
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/desktop-devel-list@gnome.org/msg09406.html
>>
>> Does anyone have any concerns with this? If not, I'll make the
>> appropriate changes to things that live under http://simpytools.sf.net .
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Otis
>> --
>> Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ -- Tag. Search. Share.
>>
>


--
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ -- Tag. Search. Share.