<<< 1) S-Reflexivity: Not always "a" is equivalent to "a".<br>2) S-Transitivity: Let "a" be equivalent with "b" and "b" equivalent with "c". Then ...
<<< 1) S-Reflexivity: Not always "a" is equivalent to "a".<br> 2) S-Transitivity: Let "a" be equivalent with "b" and "b" equivalent with "c".<br> Then...
<Perhaps some sort of quantum mechanical thing would apply here.><br><br>That would be great, Howard, if you can write a paper or book on s-quantum ...
<<what's the difference between quantum physics and quantum mechanics?<br><br>also what quantum theory means?>><br><br><br>I don't know what the ...
I got a definition from a Dictionary of Physics about "Quantum Mechanics" that I copy below:<br>"A methematical physical theory that grew out of Planck's...
I come back because I found a definition for Quantum Theory as well from the same dictionary:<br>"A departure from the classical mechanics of Newton involving ...
I think I have a reasonable definition for "quantum" congruence of segments.<br><br>On the sphere, antipodal points have infinitely many segments joining them,...
Looks interesting, Howard, can we connect quantum theory with geometry? It seems that a probabilistic s-geometry would be better used in quantum physics than...
<<Definition: The q-segment AB is the set of all possible segments AB. Each<br> mention of the q-segment AB refers to one particular segment AB with<br> ...
<<<I am not sure if q-segment is best name because "quantum" means small, actually it means "the smallest amount of energy that a system can gain or...
<<A generalization of fuzzy logic is called neutrosophic logic. We might say<br> neutrosophic congruence? >><br><br>I read that in the neutrosophic...
<<I would ask Howard if he develop the s-counter-projective geometry? Any Howard model again?<br>Jean >><br><br>I don't really have anything here....
I succeeded to build this last Howard model and indeed the second axiom for the projective geometry is s-denied. I read more messages and I hope I understood a...
Checking the first counter axiom, as suggested by Chong, I found out that it is s-denied on this model!<br>I think I am right:<br>if we take a point say A1 on ...
PS: the previous message was sent to me by email by Mike Antholy, but I posted it. Please give all the credit to him.<br><br>I agree with him, but am waiting...
What Mike says looks right to me.<br><br>We don't really have a definition for s-lines near boundaries. In all of the models I describe, I always assume that ...
As a understand we need s-lines of 2, 1, or zero points (imaginary lines? or lines at infinite?) to s-deny the thrid projective axiom. How then to build a...
<<As a understand we need s-lines of 2, 1, or zero points (imaginary lines? or lines at infinite?) to s-deny the thrid projective axiom. How then to ...
< <<As a understand we need s-lines of 2, 1, or zero points (imaginary lines? or lines at infinite?) to s-deny the thrid projective axiom. How then to...
I have posted a picture for the counter-projective model I was describing earlier, except I have added two elliptic vertices to allow a more thorough ...
Yes, I checked this Howard model too and it works.<br>It is a model for an s-counter projective geometry.<br><br><<Finally, Axiom III is violated by...
<<However, what about s-lines with no point at all?<br>Would they be called imaginary lines?<br>Would it be possible to define an s-line at infinite? ...
<<A finite model with boundary, the boundary to be an s-line at infinite, or s-line with no point? <br>chonghulai>><br><br>I am not sure if it's...
<<A finite model with boundary, the boundary to be an s-line at infinite, or<br> s-line with no point? <br> chonghulai>><br><br>Copying Jean, or...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
