Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
sml-dev
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1 - 30 of 5159   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1
Hello, Welcome to SML-DEV mailing list, the primary mailing list for SML developers. Discussion on this mailing list should be contained to SML in general and...
Don Park
donpark@...
Send Email
Nov 29, 1999
2:17 am
2
"don park" <donpar-@...> wrote: original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/sml-dev/?start=1 ... I promise. I am already sad :( But it does not...
Robert La Quey
robertl1@...
Send Email
Nov 30, 1999
6:46 pm
3
... Assembly language of sort in one sense, a house-cleaning in another sense. ... This is true to certain extent. It is too easy to fall into traditional...
Don Park
donpark@...
Send Email
Nov 30, 1999
7:12 pm
4
I appologize to the sudden shift from XML-DEV. I felt there was a freight train of a reaction from the storm of SML-related messages we posted over the...
Don Park
donpark@...
Send Email
Nov 30, 1999
8:00 pm
5
Hello there! Its great to have a separate SML list! No ridicule from the hardcore XML folks :) I really like the SML idea from the start, we should have as...
Pavel Velikhov
pvelikho@...
Send Email
Nov 30, 1999
10:14 pm
6
I'm very happy to see this effort. As some of you may be aware, I'm working on a distributed bookkeeping system with an associate Dan Palanza. Also, part time...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
1:18 am
7
... ;) Clark...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
1:23 am
8
I think all we're trying to do is to get from point A to point B, where point A is a world that is suffering unnecessarily from XML's complexities and point B...
Joe Lapp
jlapp@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
4:55 am
9
I think much of what Joe is writing is correct ... but I have one huge caveat. Attributes are a major problem and very hard to ignore if we need upward...
Robert La Quey
robertl1@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
5:33 am
10
... I am not sure about the XSL business. Is it really necessary to duplicate the XSL design? There are a couple things that I personally don't like about XSL:...
Pavel Velikhov
pvelikho@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
6:25 am
11
Hi. I've been following the SML discussion as a lurker in XML-DEV. I haven't chimed in for the same reason that I hate speaking to large crowds :) I think any...
Brad Clawsie
brad@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
6:39 am
12
... I think attributes must go in all SMLs. A solution I like is to allow attributes as syntactic sugar: an attribute is really an element then. However I...
Pavel Velikhov
pvelikho@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
6:11 am
13
... We might implement this (syntactic sugar) by having a convertor that will map SML++ (with attributes) in a well defined and unique way into SML--. Note...
Robert La Quey
robertl1@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
6:40 am
14
... Not in my opinion. If people want to use XSL, they can use XML. SML documents would be so trivial to manipulate that I wouldn't think that further...
Brad Clawsie
brad@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
6:43 am
15
... Certainly. I was not intending to say we should mimic XSL (although that is a legitimate reading of the test which I wrote.) Rather my intent was to say...
Robert La Quey
robertl1@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
6:49 am
16
... I have another option for us to consider. It is born of my belief that the syntax of attributes is not the problem, it's the semantics that give us...
Joe Lapp
jlapp@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
6:54 am
17
... So far I agree, but only so far. I have developed one major site using exactly this approach. I think for now it was the best approach available. I am not...
Robert La Quey
robertl1@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
7:00 am
18
... Grrrr. Actually, I wasn't entirely happy with XQL either. It's not really a query language anyway. The name is unfortunate. Jonathan Robie is fixing...
Joe Lapp
jlapp@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
7:06 am
19
... But now you are duplicating the semantic distinctions between attributes and elements of XML. Why not consider the following: attributes and elements are...
Pavel Velikhov
pvelikho@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
7:20 am
20
... Yes, that is a great starting point! I propose we start with ground zero, elements and text nodes only, no attributes, etc, and fix the remaining confusion...
Pavel Velikhov
pvelikho@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
7:22 am
21
... I'm claiming to have hidden all of the semantics by adding syntactic constraints. It does mean that only those named constituents that exhibit certain...
Joe Lapp
jlapp@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
7:41 am
22
... point A is a world that is suffering ... largely free of them. But *who* is suffering from XML's complexities. The developers of processors? Sure but they...
James Tauber
jtauber@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
8:20 am
23
... Hi James, Would you please define the "XML Infoset" or provide a URL for us Simpletons who are still coming up to steam. TIA, Bob La Quey...
Robert La Quey
robertl1@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
8:40 am
24
Joe, I like your pragmatic approach, glad to see you signed up on this list. I'll comment on your attributes seperately. ;) Robert, I've long held the belief...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
9:42 am
25
... James, I'm convinced that attributes are broken in XML. And, the last time I looked, InfoSet seems to have inherited this brokenness. ... I think that...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
9:54 am
26
... The XML Infoset[1] is a formal description of the set of information that an XML processor passes to an application as a result of parsing an XML document....
James Tauber
jtauber@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
10:36 am
27
... Yes. Our discussions on the other list clearly showed this fault line. Further, our discussion has shown that attributes are indeed broken in XML. ... I...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
10:43 am
28
... Well, admittedly, the InfoSet is pretty much determined by the reporting requirements on XML processors. Regarding the brokenness of attributes, I still...
James Tauber
jtauber@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
10:43 am
29
I think the following issues should be decided before we go into debate about specific SML features (such as attributes, name spaces, etc.). I1 - Are all valid...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
11:38 am
30
... The answer is a function of time, it ranges from 'yes' to 'no' on all three points -- especially as XML continues to grow. ... It will catch on if it meets...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
11:49 am
Messages 1 - 30 of 5159   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help