... It wasn't my idea originally - I forwarded a message from XML-DEV by Rev.Rob. which suggested it (obviously it didn't fly well as an XML suggestion). I've...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Feb 1, 2000 9:18 am
2025
... Hmmm. That's exactly what I was aiming at in the NVC API... Does it make more sense from this perspective? Share & Enjoy, Oren Ben-Kiki...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Feb 1, 2000 9:20 am
2026
... (the ... I though of another definition for noise: '<' some-non-name-character ..... same-non-name-character '>' Would work fine for PIs (<? ... ?>) also...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Feb 1, 2000 9:41 am
2027
... I've given Namespaces a lot of thought over the last few weeks, as I was aiming to try and write a basic usage spec which might help people grok things...
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Feb 1, 2000 10:15 am
2028
... From: "Joe Lapp" <joe@...> To: <sml-dev@egroups.com> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 9:52 AM Subject: [sml-dev] The Holy Grail of Simplification ...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Feb 1, 2000 1:14 pm
2029
Davidd Megginson said on XML-DEV, in response to someone asking why the W3C people got a special Q&A session at XTech2000: " > Why limit the topics of...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Feb 1, 2000 1:37 pm
2030
... From: "Joe Lapp" <joe@...> To: <sml-dev@egroups.com> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 10:35 AM Subject: [sml-dev] Re: Help needed on some CXML...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Feb 1, 2000 6:06 pm
2031
I uploaded a document to the Vault for comments: http://www.egroups.com/docvault/sml-dev/Work/CXMLGuidelinesV1.htm This is a stab at the CXML guidelines. It...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Feb 1, 2000 6:36 pm
2032
... I have no problem with squishing. Just enumerating through options. ... Not really. XML Namespace declarations are still required but only at the root....
Don Park
donpark@...
Feb 1, 2000 6:37 pm
2033
I'll be reading it on the plane to NJ... ... From: Michael Champion <Mike.Champion@...> To: <sml-dev@egroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 01,...
Dale Hunscher
dale@...
Feb 1, 2000 6:40 pm
2034
I'm not sure whether to feel good or bad about this, but there's a post by Didier PH Martin on XML-DEV that echoes some of our data modelling discussions. ...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Feb 1, 2000 6:45 pm
2035
... From: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@...> To: <sml-dev@egroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 1:36 PM Subject: [sml-dev] Rough 1st...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Feb 1, 2000 6:51 pm
2036
... FYI, egroups are maintaing a separate archive of the list at http://www.egroups.com/groups/xml-dev/ The post you're looking for is at: ...
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Feb 1, 2000 7:32 pm
2037
I like SXML (Simple-XML) and CXML (Common-XML). I wonder if this is a violation of XML trademark? Don Park - mailto:donpark@... Docuverse -...
Don Park
donpark@...
Feb 1, 2000 7:44 pm
2038
... I don't think we discussed xml:space and xml:lang explicitly but I always assumed that they were quirky and isolated enough to warrant removing from both...
Don Park
donpark@...
Feb 1, 2000 7:50 pm
2039
... From: "Don Park" <donpark@...> To: <sml-dev@egroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 2:54 PM Subject: [sml-dev] Re: Help needed on some CXML...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Feb 1, 2000 7:53 pm
2040
... From: "Joe Lapp" <joe@...> To: <sml-dev@egroups.com> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 11:43 AM Subject: [sml-dev] Re: Naming Names ... What would...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Feb 1, 2000 7:56 pm
2041
... CXML is not just for data; it supports mixed content (right?) and attributes. As we outlined earlier, CXML is good for educational and interoperability...
Joe Lapp
joe@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:04 pm
2042
... I got your six, Mike. Don Park - mailto:donpark@... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com...
Don Park
donpark@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:04 pm
2043
... If we are a strict subset, we can probably get away with it -- there is plenty of precedent. If we are not, we'll probably be in for trouble. We could be...
Joe Lapp
joe@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:11 pm
2044
... Two things: 1) I've heard that the W3C is not enforcing the XML trademark for some reason. 2) Are you sure you want to lose the branding on SML? Renaming...
Simon St.Laurent
simonstl@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:15 pm
2045
... I don't know about the 'good' part but: 'xml:space' is attached to an element to signal an intention that in that element, white space should be preserved...
Don Park
donpark@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:21 pm
2046
... That's why I said my interest is XML for B2B. It's also why I'm proposing the name XML for Data Subset (X4D Subset). People who see "SML" and see that it...
Joe Lapp
joe@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:23 pm
2047
... Great to hear! ... Absolutely. It is exactly the branding that we need most to abandon. It has negative branding and negative connotation. Fix the ...
Joe Lapp
joe@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:28 pm
2048
... No offense but X4D sounds like a robot (i.e. R2D2) to me. But then if SML becomes X4D, we can rename Common-XML to X4U. X4D and X4U. Hmm. I am a little...
Don Park
donpark@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:33 pm
2049
... What's wrong with a little humor? I'm all for it! R2D2 was a catchy name. Good marketing. We could learn from it....
Joe Lapp
joe@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:36 pm
2050
... If you're planning on managing the relaunch and spreading the word, that's fine - to me, that's making life way too hard. Personally, I'd say you're...
Simon St.Laurent
simonstl@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:37 pm
2051
X4D is catchy, but there is also the old 4D (4th Dimension) relational database, FourD accounting packages, and a host of other "4-D" things. Not even counting...
Eugene Kuznetsov
eugene@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:40 pm
2052
... We don't have that much invested right now. Time is our #1 enemy. The more time that goes by, the harder it will be. Not much time has passed yet. ... ...
Joe Lapp
joe@...
Feb 1, 2000 8:45 pm
2053
... From: "Joe Lapp" <joe@...> To: <sml-dev@egroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 3:33 PM Subject: [sml-dev] Re: Naming Names ... My situation...