Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
sml-dev
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 22 - 51 of 5159   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
22
... point A is a world that is suffering ... largely free of them. But *who* is suffering from XML's complexities. The developers of processors? Sure but they...
James Tauber
jtauber@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
8:20 am
23
... Hi James, Would you please define the "XML Infoset" or provide a URL for us Simpletons who are still coming up to steam. TIA, Bob La Quey...
Robert La Quey
robertl1@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
8:40 am
24
Joe, I like your pragmatic approach, glad to see you signed up on this list. I'll comment on your attributes seperately. ;) Robert, I've long held the belief...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
9:42 am
25
... James, I'm convinced that attributes are broken in XML. And, the last time I looked, InfoSet seems to have inherited this brokenness. ... I think that...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
9:54 am
26
... The XML Infoset[1] is a formal description of the set of information that an XML processor passes to an application as a result of parsing an XML document....
James Tauber
jtauber@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
10:36 am
27
... Yes. Our discussions on the other list clearly showed this fault line. Further, our discussion has shown that attributes are indeed broken in XML. ... I...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
10:43 am
28
... Well, admittedly, the InfoSet is pretty much determined by the reporting requirements on XML processors. Regarding the brokenness of attributes, I still...
James Tauber
jtauber@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
10:43 am
29
I think the following issues should be decided before we go into debate about specific SML features (such as attributes, name spaces, etc.). I1 - Are all valid...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
11:38 am
30
... The answer is a function of time, it ranges from 'yes' to 'no' on all three points -- especially as XML continues to grow. ... It will catch on if it meets...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
11:49 am
31
As contribution to our group, rather than spurting out answers, let me express how I think. This will give us a pattern language with which we can better...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
12:37 pm
32
... OK, let's talk specifically about SML 1.0 then :-) ... I thought of SML 1.0 as the "simple core" you refer to. ... Well, I was thinking about a bit more...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
12:51 pm
33
IMHO, what ever standard SML has, it must be invariant under the identity operation. Thus, emitter(parser(x)) = x So, this means quite a bit to attributes: If...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
12:53 pm
34
Hi all, Thought I'd come and lurk here and see what was happening... ... the ... attributes ... S-expressions. ... I agree here - it would be nice to know that...
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
1:06 pm
35
... I don't think we need I4. I'm much less concerned about code-reuseability than data-reuseability. What I have in mind for a processor is completely...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
1:13 pm
36
... Document vs Document Fragment stuff is awful. I've never liked the distinction. *ML is recursive, so I feel uneasy about trying to distinguish between...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
2:00 pm
37
... This is a consequence of (I3). If the SML APIs are a subset of the XML APIs, you can trivially use an XML library/parser/etc. ... recreated/revised ... ...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
2:08 pm
38
... Both of these are key items. Like relational databases, I think these are best done at a higher level since the solution to both of these questions depend...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
2:18 pm
39
... SML ... results. ... as ... Hmmm. I didn't think of I4 as code reusability; my motivation was that I could send an SML file to anyone - whether he's using...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
2:19 pm
40
... Assuming you agree that SML should be a subset of XML, the issue is (from an adoption standpoint) how significant a subset it should be in order to merit...
Brad Clawsie
brad@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
2:21 pm
41
... Yes, I do agree that SML 1.0 should be a strict subset. ... I want something simple to build upon. What I make may compete with XML to a degree, and might...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
2:47 pm
42
... This is almost exactly what happened with SGML... XML is *really* the SGML subset (with a few extra touches) that the SGML community used for...
Gavin Thomas Nicol
gtn@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
3:18 pm
43
... not a ... disaster. I happen to agree strongly. ... You can always do that. Personally, I think a lot of the power of XSL could be accomplished with a...
Gavin Thomas Nicol
gtn@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
3:21 pm
44
Sorry about going off topic, I'll try to clear it up before I get into problems... ;) ... If the schema design stuck to SML (the strict subset) then there will...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
3:22 pm
45
... Note also that SML is something for the short term (weeks to months) while YML is a long term (years). SML is "All the XML you really need." YML is "What...
Robert La Quey
robertl1@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
3:54 pm
46
... I don't agree. If I want a simpler API and that falls out of SML then why not use it? A lot of the comments on XML-DEV (mine included) saw API...
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
4:12 pm
47
... Just trim SAX. It's almost there, eliminate the attributes and processing instructions and you are very close. Although there is one addition that I'd...
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
4:34 pm
48
... DOM would be more interesting - but my point was you ought to be able to demonstrate the SML 'simplicity' by trimming the APIs. If SAX can be trimmed...
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
5:40 pm
49
James, thanks for joining us and for taking us credibly. Looking forward to you contributions... ... webMethods builds many little targeted technologies on...
Joe Lapp
jlapp@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
7:51 pm
50
... Sorry, that was a little hasty -- too little sleep, and I whipped it up as I was being dragged away to interview someone. My apologies. I'm very happy...
Joe Lapp
jlapp@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
10:02 pm
51
... By "valid" do you mean "wellformed" or are you asking a bigger question? ... Very good questions, and the answers should color our approach. In fact, I'd...
Joe Lapp
jlapp@...
Send Email
Dec 1, 1999
10:19 pm
Messages 22 - 51 of 5159   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help