... Or rather Leigh Dodds wrote, but managed to mess up his mail config. As far as he's aware his fiance isn't *that* interested in markup languages. *blush* ...
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Apr 1, 2000 12:20 pm
2967
... Why, that's easy, here's one, with all kind of nodes: <order> <item> <id> Q9765 <xml.syntax>attribute</xml.syntax> </id> <price>17</price> <date> <?iso8601...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Apr 2, 2000 5:48 pm
2968
... Notes: I've not include namespaces in the examples so as to not confuse issues; the namespace approach appears to be completely seperable from this issue....
Clark C. Evans
cce@...
Apr 2, 2000 6:44 pm
2969
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote: Let me dress it up some... ... * for a 1001 household uses!</bold> They come looped * to a...
Clark C. Evans
cce@...
Apr 2, 2000 7:23 pm
2970
If we moved forward with using <?notation ... ?> for support of natively represented values; we need some gaurentee that the encodings are interoperable....
Clark C. Evans
cce@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:21 pm
2971
... I was going to say, because commented content is simply not parsed at all (efficiency!). But that's not true for two reasons: - It is parsed as far as...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Apr 2, 2000 8:21 pm
2972
... There probably are some, there's an ISO standard for _everything_. Probably more then one :-) ... Would you like to see "decimal/int32" vs. "octal/int32"...
Oren Ben-Kiki
oren@...
Apr 2, 2000 9:00 pm
2973
... Right; you can have a callback stack or some other API level mechanism that does not affect the information model. ... Right; but your example had...
Clark C. Evans
cce@...
Apr 2, 2000 9:03 pm
2974
As it comes down to the wire; to get nice whitespace and coloring support (which follows from mixed-content), it seems to come down to the following two model...
Clark C. Evans
cce@...
Apr 2, 2000 9:24 pm
2975
... Correct; nested parsing is complicated, better to stick to single-level parsing. ... Cool. ;) Clark...
Clark C. Evans
cce@...
Apr 2, 2000 9:26 pm
2976
... OK. ... Think of the second as a coroutine. I see no reason it cannot be multi-pass if need be. Why do you say this? Are you forcing single pass as a...
Bob La Quey
robertl1@...
Apr 2, 2000 10:17 pm
2977
... To me multi-pass implies that there is an output and that the output is re-parsed. Thus, by definition, it is a multi-stage process. I'm not sure if a ...
Clark C. Evans
cce@...
Apr 2, 2000 10:32 pm
2978
... I don't know where it is written that a parser must be single staged. This may be common. This may be good practice. But there is nothing in the definition...
Bob La Quey
robertl1@...
Apr 2, 2000 11:21 pm
2979
Look what a certified luminary like Peter Murray-Rust is saying on XML-DEV! (quoted below) Is it time to go public with a Common XML draft to try to make the...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Apr 3, 2000 1:44 pm
2980
... And David Megginson seems to agree that there are real interoperability issues, while Tim Bray still doesn't seem to think that these issues qualify as...
Simon St.Laurent
simonstl@...
Apr 3, 2000 2:51 pm
2981
... My life is pretty overbooked right now, or I'd gird myself with asbestos and march into the flames with you <grin>. This also might be the time for...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Apr 3, 2000 3:27 pm
2982
... XML ... Definitely. I'm a little disappointed that the XSLT stuff seems to have sunk beneath the surface again. I've been giving it some thought lately, so...
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Apr 3, 2000 3:37 pm
2983
Here's a first hack at defining the core. I'm well aware that this will need pruning, cleaning, polishing, and probably reconstruction. Melding it with the...
Simon St.Laurent
simonstl@...
Apr 3, 2000 3:48 pm
2984
... From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@...> To: <sml-dev@egroups.com> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 11:36 AM Subject: RE: [sml-dev] Common XML - time to strike...
Michael Champion
Mike.Champion@...
Apr 3, 2000 4:16 pm
2985
Again, this is a quick first pass. Each section is more or less "you can use this, but this is why it didn't make it into the core." Comments, suggestions,...
Simon St.Laurent
simonstl@...
Apr 3, 2000 5:07 pm
2986
... Yep. I just posted the rest of Common XML, admittedly in a form that needs a lot of plaster itself. Hopefully that can provide a base for Common XML and...
Simon St.Laurent
simonstl@...
Apr 3, 2000 5:10 pm
2987
I like it. Good short starter. Don Park - mailto:donpark@... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com...
Don Park
donpark@...
Apr 3, 2000 7:45 pm
2988
... Add: All whitespace within element and attribute boundaries is always significant. ... Add: Obviously, since CoreXML does not support DTDs, default ...
Clark C. Evans
cce@...
Apr 3, 2000 7:47 pm
2989
Parser work is winding down. I'll get to OpenMarkup.org afterward. Hopefully the hoopla on XML-DEV is still going on by then. I usually like to make my own...
Don Park
donpark@...
Apr 3, 2000 7:48 pm
2990
Very nice. I didn't realize it before but this section will make Common XML spec a required reading for all XML users. Very nice indeed. Best Don Park -...
Don Park
donpark@...
Apr 3, 2000 7:51 pm
2991
I think our nose is too close to the ground. 1. Why are we having mixed-content back in MinXML? 2. Are colors are critical to MinXML? Best, Don Park -...
Don Park
donpark@...
Apr 3, 2000 7:58 pm
2992
... Yeh, I think we have drifted in the direction of YML....
Bob La Quey
robertl1@...
Apr 3, 2000 8:09 pm
2993
... Within elements, I'll track down exactly what XML 1.0 says and repeat it in plainer English. Within attributes, no - XML 1.0 specifies normalization. I'll...
Simon St.Laurent
simonstl@...
Apr 3, 2000 8:59 pm
2994
Hi, I just noticed - did we do away with the "no attribute of an element should have the same name as a child element"? I thought that at the time it was...
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Apr 3, 2000 9:10 pm
2995
... How about also suggesting that, where possible, standardising on a prefix for particular schemas? This is not to suggest a single registry, or to define a...