Hi, I created an HTML document that allows you to create a VVM document, which is then rendered as an outliner. http://w3future.com/html/tryvvm.html For...
Sjoerd Visscher
sjoerd_visscher@...
Mar 6, 2001 12:30 am
4511
... ... and creating it - or, better phrased, *moving* it into the model. IMVHO, this is the next step in moving VVM away from MinML... Which is a pity; I ...
Oren Ben-Kiki
orenbk@...
Mar 6, 2001 7:00 am
4512
... the ... model. IMVHO, ... pity; I ... year or so ... used to ... accepting a ... number of ... I'm sorry. I had no idea concatenating strings was complex....
Sjoerd Visscher
sjoerd_visscher@...
Mar 6, 2001 12:13 pm
4513
... Some issues: - It requires a full traversal of a (sub) tree; - It requires repeated dynamic allocation of storage, or a two-pass algorithm. - It probably...
Oren Ben-Kiki
orenbk@...
Mar 6, 2001 2:41 pm
4514
... sync. ... will have ... What about having one long string (the value of the root). Then each content node can have a start pointer to the position of it's...
Sjoerd Visscher
sjoerd_visscher@...
Mar 6, 2001 8:17 pm
4515
Well, W3C Schema, the crowning achievement of the XML Complexity Movement (and the antithesis of the XML Minimalization Movement), is finally about to become a...
Michael Champion
mchamp@...
Mar 18, 2001 12:03 pm
4516
... Do you want to co-author something? I may not agree with some of the SML approaches (I think Common XML is a Good Thing though), but I *do* agree with...
Gavin Thomas Nicol
gtn@...
Mar 18, 2001 2:26 pm
4517
... Please keep smallSchema http://www.smallstd.org/smallschema/index.html in mind as well. After correspondence on this list, I'm no longer actively ...
Mark S. Miller
markm@...
Mar 18, 2001 5:10 pm
4518
... My hope is to have a number of us collaborate to put together something along the lines of Common XML itself -- a moderate statement of what really works...
Michael Champion
mchamp@...
Mar 18, 2001 7:22 pm
4519
... I'm in... Sign me up. -- Tom Bradford Founder & Chief Architect The dbXML Group, L.L.C. http://www.dbxmlgroup.com...
Tom Bradford
bradford@...
Mar 18, 2001 7:24 pm
4520
... the Right ... I'd be interested to see this develop as a useful adjunct to Common XML as well. <back-to-lurking/> Cheers, L. -- Leigh Dodds, Systems...
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Mar 18, 2001 7:42 pm
4521
Count me in too. I have started to extract myself from the project I have been working on for close to a year and should be able to spend some quality time...
Don Park
donpark@...
Mar 18, 2001 10:39 pm
4522
... the Right ... Perhaps "Common XML Design Patterns" or "Common XML Application Architectures"? I'm thinking perls of wisdom like using SAX instead of DOM...
Gavin Thomas Nicol
gtn@...
Mar 18, 2001 10:47 pm
4523
... That's why I said "layered and compositional". I like having as many components replaceable or removable as possible. If you want one component, that's all...
Gavin Thomas Nicol
gtn@...
Mar 18, 2001 10:54 pm
4524
... Design patterns are perfectly fine for people who are developing applications that use XML, but people who are developing architectures for processing...
Tom Bradford
bradford@...
Mar 18, 2001 10:57 pm
4525
... ... this is another perl of wisdom though. What experience with XML/SGML teaches you is what works and what doesn't. That goes as much for the data as it...
Gavin Thomas Nicol
gtn@...
Mar 18, 2001 11:35 pm
4526
... Talking of pick-and-mix schemas, what do you think of the 'Schemarama' discussions that took place on XML-DEV in Feb [1]? (apologies if this has been...
Leigh Dodds
ldodds@...
Mar 19, 2001 12:40 am
4527
Thanks for all the replies. It sounds like there is a consensus that this would be a good time to tell the world about Common XML, but this time within the...
Michael Champion
mchamp@...
Mar 19, 2001 1:15 pm
4528
... XForms as well, which will soon become part of your average XHTML document. ... I've been struggling with this. Note that XForms decided to make their own...
Clark C. Evans
cce@...
Mar 20, 2001 2:59 am
4529
... Thanks, Clark. Especially for the ISO 8601 reference; that sounds like something that Common XML could recommend as a simple, standard, interoperable...
mchamp@...
Mar 20, 2001 4:14 am
4530
... "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) Rgds.Paul. PS. Just kidding. PPS. Sorry I can not participate as...
pault12@...
Mar 20, 2001 7:50 pm
4531
... Bingo. I have a little type definition language I use for metadata schemas and object interfaces that I call "Simple Type Definitions in XML", which is...
Gavin Thomas Nicol
gtn@...
Mar 20, 2001 8:46 pm
4532
... Yes, I like that. I've always been looking for a schema that describes what an element should contain *at least*. Or in other words: an *open* type ...
Sjoerd Visscher
sjoerd_visscher@...
Mar 20, 2001 9:47 pm
4533
I just stumbled upon SML a few days ago when researching Caucho's implementation of EJB (apparently they're using SML as the format for their Burlap RPC...
will_conant@...
Apr 7, 2001 5:01 pm
4534
... That's pretty much the definitive Minimal XML. Minimal XML is in some sense "complete" because there is nothing left to take away that would leave us with...
mchamp@...
Apr 7, 2001 5:24 pm
4535
... From recent discussions, there seems to have been consensus on a few changes to Minimal-XML. Specifically, to allow and ignore the xml declaration and the...
Mark S. Miller
markm@...
Apr 8, 2001 5:20 am
4536
... few changes ... declaration and ... was also ... consensus ... would also ... To put it more practically, Minimal-XML is elements only, and when you are...
Sjoerd Visscher
sjoerd_visscher@...
Apr 8, 2001 10:32 am
4537
... In the absence of such terms, what does it means for Minimal-XML to be a standard? What would it mean for someone to say that a given file conforms to...
Mark S. Miller
markm@...
Apr 8, 2001 4:21 pm
4538
... From: "Sjoerd Visscher" <sjoerd_visscher@...> To: <sml-dev@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 11:31 AM Subject: [sml-dev] Re: status of...
John Wilson
tug@...
Apr 8, 2001 6:32 pm
4539
... From: <will_conant@...> To: <sml-dev@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 6:00 PM Subject: [sml-dev] status of SML ... I took a look at...