Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
soapbuilders
  • Members Only
  • Post
  • Files
  • Photos
  • Links
  • Database
  • Polls
  • Members
  • Calendar
  • Promote
  • Groups Labs (Beta)
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

   Messages Help
Message #
Search:
Advanced
WSDL schemas update   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #6853 of 10820 |

Hi, all!
Following community demand for updating WSDL schemas to Recommendation version of XML Schema, schemas were updated at the following locations:

Wsdl.xsd                -       http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/
Wsdl-mime.xsd   -       http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/
Wsdl-http.xsd   -       http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/
Wsdl-soap.xsd   -       http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/

Schemas were also fixed in couple places to match verbiage of the WSDL spec. They were reviewed and approved by spec authors.

Please take a look and tell us if there are any problems.

Thank you.



Mon Feb 4, 2002 7:19 am

Show Message Option
kirillg@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward 		Message #6853 of 10820 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi, all! Following community demand for updating WSDL schemas to Recommendation version of XML Schema, schemas were updated at the following locations: ... 		Kirill Gavrylyuk
kirillg@...
Send Email 		Feb 4, 2002
7:19 am

The use attribute on the soap body is described in the spec as "The required use attribute indicates whether...." However, in the schema it is still marked as...
James Pasley
jepasley
Offline Send Email 		Feb 4, 2002
12:01 pm

All, It looks like wsdl:required is back on the table. With regard for soap binding schema, 1) soap:body, where wsdl:required="1" or omitted is valid; ...
Matt Long
mattlong61
Offline Send Email 		Feb 4, 2002
4:09 pm

Adding soapbuilders. == Mike == ... From: Mike Deem Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:01 PM To: 'wsdl@yahoogroups.com' Subject: RE: [wsdl] FW: [soapbuilders]...
Mike Deem
mikeericdeem
Offline Send Email 		Feb 4, 2002
11:24 pm

Thanks, James, ... this seem to be a bug in the schema, need to fix this. Any objections? ... include the default values for such attributes in the schema ...
Kirill Gavrylyuk
kirillg@...
Send Email 		Feb 5, 2002
12:11 am

... Earlier versions of the schema used a sequence for the definitions element, now its a repeating choice, was there a specific reason to go away from...
Simon Fell
simonfell99
Offline Send Email 		Feb 5, 2002
3:08 am

Hi, Simon! We felt that spec wording does not limit the order of definitions children. So we put a sequence of choice elements to allow any order. What do...
Kirill Gavrylyuk
kirillg@...
Send Email 		Feb 5, 2002
3:27 am

I'd prefer for as few as possible semantic changes to be made. The fixed order is useful if you have a sax based processor for WSDL. Cheers Simon ...
Simon Fell
simonfell99
Offline Send Email 		Feb 5, 2002
3:39 am

Kirill, That's going to break some ppl who developed on the literal definition of sequence (children of definitions) in the previous schema. Thx, -Matt Long ...
Matt Long
mattlong61
Offline Send Email 		Feb 5, 2002
4:16 am

I see - sure, I don't think there is any problem with reverting it back. Does everybody concur that schema for definitions element should be reverted back to...
Kirill Gavrylyuk
kirillg@...
Send Email 		Feb 5, 2002
5:44 am
< Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Message #
Search:
Advanced
Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help