Skip to search.
soapbuilders

Group Information

  • Members: 1198
  • Category: Protocols
  • Founded: Jan 27, 2001
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Support for the BDG   Message List  
Reply Message #742 of 10830 |
The BDG is short, sweet, and easy to implement. I like it.

Therefore, as promised, I plan to put SOAP BDG support on the top of my
TODO list for xmlrpc-c. This means that users of xmlrpc-c should be able
to support SOAP BDG by changing a few lines of code.

Two notes:

1) I have no plans to support all of SOAP 1.1.

2) If the BDG conflicts with established SOAP, XML or Unicode standards,
I will stick with those standards and ignore the BDG. I am only aware
of two such cases at the moment; see my earlier post on
character-encodings.

Is anyone making a list of SOAP implementations planning to support the
BDG?

Many thanks to everyone who has worked on the BDG!

Cheers,
Eric

--
XML-RPC HOWTO: http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/XML-RPC-HOWTO/index.html
XML-RPC for C and C++: http://xmlrpc-c.sourceforge.net/



Sat Mar 31, 2001 3:44 pm

eric.kidd@...
Send Email Send Email

Message #742 of 10830 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

The BDG is short, sweet, and easy to implement. I like it. Therefore, as promised, I plan to put SOAP BDG support on the top of my TODO list for xmlrpc-c....
Eric Kidd
eric.kidd@... Send Email
Mar 31, 2001
3:40 pm

Eric, this is great news. To answer your question, no one, as far as I know, has a list of pledges to interop at the BDG level. I think your caveats are...
Dave Winer
dave@... Send Email
Mar 31, 2001
3:47 pm

... OK. At a minimum, I'd like SOAP BDG to be consistent, at least in theory, with the following standards: HTTP XML 1.0 XML Namespaces SOAP 1.1 Unicode (and...
Eric Kidd
eric.kidd@... Send Email
Mar 31, 2001
4:05 pm

... If it specifies a *subset* of one of these standards, it's OK. Is this your intent? Yes, and drop the imho part. We're defining an easy path through the ...
Dave Winer
dave@... Send Email
Mar 31, 2001
4:17 pm

... For what it's worth ... we're building a commercial product, building security net services. We're neither general infrastructure nor open source....
Rich Salz
rsalz@... Send Email
Mar 31, 2001
4:24 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help