Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
soapbuilders
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Questions regarding Round3-InteropTestDocLit.   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #7966 of 10820 |
I am looking at the InteropTest DocLit test from round 3 [1] and have a few
questions about dispatching when we do not use SOAPAction.

The description of the test does not include the echoVoid() method wereas some
WSDL does (ASP.NET do not include the echoVoid operation).

How can we associate the message on the wire with the operation?
If we have ping() and logout() operations defined, how can we distach them?

Is it true to state that,
we can only implement one method (or operation) for each part name?
we cannot have more than one input /output part for this style of invocation?

In other word,
can we have two operations that consume the same input message?
can we have two operations that have no input part?

Thanks for your wisdome on this questions.
Eric

[1] http://www.whitemesa.com/r3/plan.html




Fri Jun 14, 2002 11:53 pm

eccoonthenet
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #7966 of 10820 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I am looking at the InteropTest DocLit test from round 3 [1] and have a few questions about dispatching when we do not use SOAPAction. The description of the...
Eric Rajkovic
eccoonthenet
Offline Send Email
Jun 14, 2002
11:52 pm

Hi, Eric, I would certainly not apply the word wisdom to my emails:), but I think the consensus of the Round 3 testing is that using doc/lit style for rpc ...
Kirill Gavrylyuk
kirillg@...
Send Email
Jun 15, 2002
11:34 pm

This wrapper stuff seems silly. Why not just use RPC Literal? becky ... From: Kirill Gavrylyuk [mailto:kirillg@...] Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002...
Rebecca Dias
silkcorba
Offline Send Email
Jun 17, 2002
5:58 pm

Hi, Rebecca:-) All the difference between rpc/literal and document/literal with the use of wrappers is that in rpc/literal you use SOAP Section 7 rules to ...
Kirill Gavrylyuk
kirillg@...
Send Email
Jun 17, 2002
8:18 pm

But of course having the wrapped schema leads to tools like Apache Axis trying to 'be nice' to its users and 'unwrap' the arguments to the operation for its...
Tom Jordahl
tomj_88
Offline Send Email
Jun 17, 2002
8:56 pm

The simple question is, "Why is Wrapped Doc Lit not a hack?", are we simply trying to accomodate short-comings in the RPC Lit spec? Are we over-engineering at...
Rebecca Dias
silkcorba
Offline Send Email
Jun 17, 2002
9:49 pm

Unlike rpc style, nothing about a doc/lit operation in WSDL says "this is a method call!" - that's an implementation choice of either side. So it follows (in...
Alex DeJarnatt
adejarnatt
Offline Send Email
Jun 17, 2002
11:11 pm

While rpc/literal isn’t widely understood or implemented today, I believe the suggestion was to replace this gaping hole with a known, valid interpretation....
Wes Moulder
wes_moulder
Offline Send Email
Jun 17, 2002
11:37 pm

Hi guys, I agree with Wes on this one (surprise, surprise). It's hard enough dealing with four different combinations of invocation (rpc/document...
Graham Glass
graham_glass
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2002
12:01 am

... Well said. I am feeling the pain now. I've wrote eSOAP a while back ,and it was small and simple, supporting only rpc/encoded. Now, I am trying to come up...
Rosimildo daSIlva
rosimildo
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2002
12:26 am

To your last question in the message: WASP supports wrapped doc/lit as well as other 'combinations'. In general, I have to agree with Graham - web services are...
Radovan Janecek
radosek
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2002
10:00 am

IONA supports both. Should we be making a recommendation to the W3C? Glen, what is your take on all of this? becky ... From: Radovan Janecek...
Rebecca Dias
silkcorba
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2002
5:18 pm

... Except that .NET unfortunately ties this decision to the use of the message parts being called 'parameters' so in reality, the WSDL author gets to decide...
Simon Fell
simonfell99
Online Now Send Email
Jun 18, 2002
3:29 am

Doesn't every doc/lit implementation also support "wrapped"? Copying what .net does is hardly a requirement for interop (and Simon Fell rightly points out that...
Alex DeJarnatt
adejarnatt
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2002
4:21 pm

Right, you can treat doc/literal/wrapped the same as any other doc/literal message, you don't have to unroll the parameters. that's what i currently do for...
Simon Fell
simonfell99
Online Now Send Email
Jun 19, 2002
2:41 am

By the remark about other 'over-soap' things I wanted say that even if we are discussing doc/lit/wrapped vs. rpc/encoded or rpc/literal there are many...
radosek
Offline Send Email
Jun 25, 2002
1:18 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help