soapbuilders : Messages : 10311-10348 of 10820

Messages: Simplify \| Expand (Group by Topic)		Author	Sort by Date

10311	Hi friends, just check the following links...and share your comments... http://soapoverhttps.blogspot.com http://entintegration.com regards shishir ...	Shishir Shah shishiratyash	Jul 2, 2005 4:42 am
10312	... 1. .net1.1 time assumes that times are in local tz, so if your service is working w/ GMT zones then you only get interop problems in the GMT locations. 2....	Steve Loughran steve_loughran	Jul 5, 2005 8:52 pm
10313	Hello All. I am back on the mail list, with a dedicated alias for the purpose. That way spam mail to the list wont interfere with the unique business ...	Steve Loughran steve_loughran	Jul 5, 2005 10:13 pm
10314	Hello all, Somewhat of a newbie here and coming up to speed... looking for a "raw" (for lack of a better term) implementation of SOAP, independent of WSDL and...	hotsam2231963	Jul 6, 2005 5:38 pm
10315	Use AXIOM in http://ws.apache.org/axis2/ (see http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2005/05/10/axiom.html for a write up) -- dims ... -- Davanum Srinivas...	Davanum Srinivas dims	Jul 6, 2005 5:44 pm
10316	Quick reply - thanks! ... platform ... much ... discuss implementation and interoperability issues. Please stay on- topic....	Joseph Leporati hotsam2231963	Jul 7, 2005 6:45 am
10320	Hi When working with the juddi registry,with the juddi client library & using juddi console I get the token fine as this : <?xml version="1.0"...	muthu_tibco	Jul 20, 2005 7:28 pm
10321	Hi soapbuilders, When you have a minute, could you try out your proxy generation tools to consume the following Indigo-generated WSDLs? They correspond to ...	Kirill Gavrylyuk kirillg@...	Jul 20, 2005 10:50 pm
10322	Systinet wsdl2java and wsdlc (for C++ stubs) in latest versions consume both wsdls without problems. Note that RoundC was originally header interop [1] [1]...	Tomas Bahnik tomas.bahnik@...	Jul 21, 2005 7:55 am
10323	Tomas, REALLY? the tools should have flagged the fact that there are ws-policy attributes in wsdl:binding..guess, you have a bug in your tools. -- dims ... -- ...	Davanum Srinivas dims	Jul 21, 2005 12:27 pm
10324	Dims, I don't understand what you mean here... I didn't see any wsdl:required="true" elements in there, which means that all the extensions (including the...	Glen Daniels glen@...	Jul 21, 2005 12:57 pm
10325	Glen, Yes ("because the schema for wsdl:binding isn't attribute-extensible! ") Don't worry Kirill is doing something else now :) [Our bad (wsdl:binding element...	Davanum Srinivas dims	Jul 21, 2005 1:00 pm
10326	wsdl2h v1.1.4c from the gSOAP 2.7.3 toolkit consumes these with no problems as does wsdl.exe from .NET 1.1.4322.573. Kirill Gavrylyuk wrote: Hi soapbuilders, ...	Daniel Wilcox dvw269k	Jul 21, 2005 1:02 pm
10327	... Dims/Glen, WS-I Basic Profile 1.1 [1] has fixed this. All elements in WSDL 1.1 namespace are extensible via attribute and via elements. Pl. note that the...	Anish Karmarkar backpacker_or	Jul 21, 2005 1:45 pm
10328	Right, our intent is to switch to <wsp:PolicyReference URI=".."/> . That allows one to put wsdl:required on attachment points directly and in particular have...	Kirill Gavrylyuk kirillg@...	Jul 21, 2005 2:51 pm
10329	Our Http client was not able to read the Wsdl schema. The message included the content type with wrong quoted string: Content-Type: text/xml; charset='UTF-8' ...	Kogan, Tamara tkogan2002	Jul 21, 2005 5:29 pm
10330	JAX-WS 2.0 EA2 [1] is able to consume both WSDLs without any problems. [1] https://jax-rpc.dev.java.net/jaxws20-ea2/ -Arun ... -- got Web Services ? Download...	Arun Gupta arun_p_gupta	Jul 21, 2005 6:41 pm
10331	Thanks Tamara, good catch - it's a bug on our side. Indeed only double or none are allowed. I think most stacks got tired and allow both types of quotes:)....	Kirill Gavrylyuk kirillg@...	Jul 22, 2005 7:03 pm
10332	Guys, thanks again to everyone who tried! It's great to see that WSDL syntax is well supported out there. ... From: soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com...	Kirill Gavrylyuk kirillg@...	Jul 22, 2005 7:03 pm
10334	[cc'ed to soapbuilders because I think that community is generally interested in this kind of issue] Hi folks! In...	Glen Daniels webservicedude	Aug 5, 2005 1:55 pm
10335	... I believe someone posted elsewhere that the schema is not (yet) correct. ... Perhaps a useWSIProfile option? Or require such WSDL's to have a conformance...	Rich Salz rich_salz	Aug 5, 2005 2:57 pm
10336	Hey, if anyone on soapbuilders replies to that (or any other similar messages), please don't reply to jsr-110-eg-disc, as that group is members-only... my...	Glen Daniels glen@...	Aug 5, 2005 5:30 pm
10337	... This was a fix added to 1.1. In 1.0, some WSDL elements were extensible via attributes and some via elements. ... Unfortunately, that schema is not yet...	Anish Karmarkar backpacker_or	Aug 5, 2005 5:46 pm
10338	FYI--These are the Microsoft public RM endpoints that contain the non-compliant WSDLs. Look for wsp:PolicyURIs attribute on wsdl:binding. ...	Sonali Kanaujia sonalijaidka	Aug 5, 2005 6:45 pm
10339	We're fixing the issue at hand. But I agree with Glenn, that the restriction on wsdl:binding attribute extensibility was not the intent of WSDL spec and it...	Kirill Gavrylyuk kirillg@...	Aug 5, 2005 6:49 pm
10344	I ran into some issues with SOAP Headers that are simple types when using .NET 1.1. I documented the issues here ...	Simon Fell simonfell99	Aug 11, 2005 5:33 pm
10345	Hi Simon, .Net 1.1 behavior aside, this is an interesting issue, that I don't think was discussed a lot (surprisingly). I do not believe that test_1header.wsdl...	Kirill Gavrylyuk kirillg@...	Aug 12, 2005 12:59 am
10346	Meant to add [1] http://www.pocketsoap.com/weblog/2005/08/test_1header.wsdl ... From: soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com] On...	Kirill Gavrylyuk kirillg@...	Aug 12, 2005 1:01 am
10347	That's a good point. I'd say its valid, although it doesn't account for everything. (a request which is valid to the schema is a valid request) You could also...	Simon Fell simonfell99	Aug 12, 2005 1:15 am
10348	ahhh, here's the pointer to when i last tried this http://www.dotnet247.com/247reference/msgs/7/36948.aspx cheers Simon...	Simon Fell simonfell99	Aug 12, 2005 3:47 am

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...

Messages

Yahoo! My Yahoo! Mail
	Sign In New User? Sign Up
		Tech - Groups - Help

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...

Best of Y! Groups

Messages