Matt, others, I don't think we want to be necessarily interoperable even in clearly semantically erroneous message cases. IMO the third choice is the best from...
5429
Matt Long
mlong@...
Oct 1, 2001 1:28 pm
Jacek, My issue w/ (3) is that it embraces a level of dis-interoperability. 1) is there some basic (non-political) reason we cannot agree on some basic rules...
5430
Jacek Kopecky
jacek@...
Oct 1, 2001 1:59 pm
Matt, I think that the basic non-political reason for _not_changing_ the behavior in such clearly erroneous cases is that it adds (possibly non-trivial) logic...
5431
Matt Long
mlong@...
Oct 1, 2001 2:18 pm
... imo, the not allowing lower position following higher position is only a function of whether you allow, i.e., don't fault, a combo of "offset" != 0 and...
5432
Jacek Kopecky
jacek@...
Oct 1, 2001 2:35 pm
Matt, you are right, there remains the more general issue of mixing offset and positions (non-positioned vs. positioned elements). I favor 2), i.e. forbidding...
5433
Rich Salz
rsalz@...
Oct 1, 2001 2:42 pm
Is it more likely to be a sender BUG or proper behavior if a serialization "overwrites" elements? How many times, for example, does Perl's "keys" iterating...
5434
Matt Long
mlong@...
Oct 1, 2001 2:55 pm
Jacek, There is room for both (1) and (2) as the (1)s will interop with the (2)s. The bigger concern is whether the (2)s will interop with each other. If you ...
5435
Matt Long
mlong@...
Oct 1, 2001 3:03 pm
hi rich, My recollection from the opinion in [1] is that duplicates are not allowed. [1] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soapbuilders/message/5126 This is not...
5436
Jacek Kopecky
jacek@...
Oct 1, 2001 3:25 pm
Matt, Yes it is reasonable because you're effectively saying "let's all accept (and some implement) Andrew's logic." This is a clear proposal. But there can be...
5437
Dave Winer
dave@...
Oct 1, 2001 4:08 pm
Good morning! I'd like to open a connection between two worlds I'm part of -- the SOAP 1.1 developer community and people who run "weblog" sites. Presumably...
5438
Dave Winer
dave@...
Oct 1, 2001 5:41 pm
Noteworthy.. I added Mac OS X [1] to the directory [2] of 48 XML-RPC implementations. They're the first operating system to bake in support for XML-RPC. Quite...
5439
roman.tomasic@...
Oct 2, 2001 7:49 am
Soap sample AddressBook Error:'samples.addressbook.Address' could not be resolved Example of error X:\java samples.addressbook.GetAddress ...
5440
Martin Frydl
martin@...
Oct 2, 2001 12:30 pm
Hi, I'm getting incorrect message when sending sparse array with hrefs. To requests <SOAP-ENV:Envelope ...
5441
Martin Frydl
martin@...
Oct 2, 2001 1:58 pm
Hello, I'm getting incorrect types in some message from SOAP:Lite. If I send this as part of echoStructArray request: <arg xsi1:type="ns1:SOAPStruct"> ...
5442
Martin Frydl
martin@...
Oct 2, 2001 2:18 pm
Hello everybody, I tried to specify type of element (xsi:type) in three different namespaces for maximum interoperability. So I have xsi9:type, xsi0:type and...
5443
Simon Fell
soap@...
Oct 2, 2001 3:51 pm
4s4c tries to pick a schema version from the request to generate the response, by default it will respond with a 2001 schema, unless the 1999 schema is used in...
5444
Rich Salz
rsalz@...
Oct 2, 2001 3:56 pm
There is an important and possibly-subtle lesson here. I hope that because I don't have the time to write a Noah or Andrew style missive (long and...
5445
Paul Kulchenko
paulclinger@...
Oct 2, 2001 4:00 pm
Hi, Martin! I put float. Could you try again? Best wishes, Paul. ... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo!...
5446
Pete Hendry
peter.hendry@...
Oct 2, 2001 4:01 pm
I'm lost as to the point of doing this? Pete...
5447
Jacek Kopecky
jacek@...
Oct 2, 2001 4:22 pm
Pete, let me try to explain, even though I'm not Martin. Martin's message tries to communicate an information "the type is...
5448
Paul Kulchenko
paulclinger@...
Oct 2, 2001 4:27 pm
Hi, Martin! I also thought this idea will work, but now I don't think so ;). What schema you expect to get in response? Forget about WSDL for a second. You...
5449
Paul Kulchenko
paulclinger@...
Oct 2, 2001 4:33 pm
Hi, Jacek! ... That's right, but problem is in second phrase. You may have English as your native language and know only this phrase in Spanish and German, but...
5450
Jacek Kopecky
jacek@...
Oct 2, 2001 4:54 pm
Paul, please see my comments inside. Jacek Kopecky Idoox http://www.idoox.com/ ... If the server doesn't understand 2001, it won't understand the ...
5451
Simon Fell
sfell@...
Oct 2, 2001 4:56 pm
surely, in that case the same argument can be made for the client. It has the WSDL, why doesn't it just send a 2001 request, as indicated in the WSDL ? Cheers ...
5452
Pete Hendry
peter.hendry@...
Oct 2, 2001 4:57 pm
... I understand what Martin is doing, I just don't see why anyone would want to do it and why it should be supported for interop. Your example above is...
5453
Martin Frydl
martin@...
Oct 2, 2001 5:01 pm
Hi Simon, I understand that you return xsi:type attribute with one of the namespaces, but you also change the value of attribute. I send the same xsd1:string...
5454
rlarson@...
Oct 2, 2001 5:02 pm
Hello, I'm using the MS Toolkit SP 2 and Apache SOAP 2.2 and the MS Toolkit is unable to process what appears (to me) to be a completely valid reply from the...
5455
Jacek Kopecky
jacek@...
Oct 2, 2001 5:02 pm
Paul, My problem with the second phrase is that it says something different from what the first phrase says. John is not Juan. The Schema spec doesn't exempt...
5456
Peter de Jong
pdejong@...
Oct 2, 2001 5:03 pm
.Net Remoting Soap supports ArrayOfArrays. Any of the ArrayOfArrays can be multidimensional. Peter ... From: Matt Long [mailto:mlong@...] Sent:...
5457
Jacek Kopecky
jacek@...
Oct 2, 2001 5:12 pm
Simon, but it does. The client sends a request that contains data typed as xsd2001:string, just as the WSDL requests. The problem here is that neither SOAP nor...
