... Thanks Ric. I *always* thought that the "schema" in WSDL would be orthogonal to SOAP encoding rules. Thanks for making the point clear. BTW, I used the...
Wow, Jorgen, where to begin? I disagree with just about everything in your note. So, if only to get an alternate opinion "into the record" let me make state...
Phalanx interop tests will be down from ~30 days during office move. Web Servers will be down until Monday 4/1/02. Thx, -Matt Long Phalanx Systems, LLC...
Hi All - I've been able to create a simple C# web service using .NET beta 2 with a no param 'Hello World' method, and have been able to call that method from a...
Here's an overview of the publish-subscribe system we've developed at UserLand. http://backend.userland.com/publishSubscribeWalkthrough I've been explaining...
I am still testing with VB using MS SOAP toolkit 2.0 SP2 and Apache 2.2. I found out that SOAP tookit 2.0 did not work for me is that "No deserializer found...
... Wow, Rich, I think you have misunderstand almost everything in my note ;-) ... That is because this group is focused on interoperability testing, and the...
www.XMLBus.com/interop has a host of results from the most recent SOAP Builders Interop Forum. Here you can see what implementations and from what vendors are ...
... hi swati.... actually what u r trying to do , let me know clearly ... what is ur problem ? where you are trying to implement the soap , and what you want...
Hi, I have a question with regard to the validity of the following schema: <complexType name="address"> <sequence> <element name="city" type="xsd:string"/> ...
I believe local qnames must be unique. I'm not sure where it's specified, and I'll look for it further, but I'm pretty sure that's the case. --Wes ... From:...
Robert, Looking at section 2.5 of xmlschema-1, I gather this: Within a given symbol space, names are unique, but the same name may appear in more than one...
The type definition is not legal. A element with a given QName ( zip ) in a given context ( address type ) cannot be bound to more than one type. The relevant...
Thanks! It is easy to overlook this kind of information in these long specs. One more question though: is the following legal? <complexType name="baseAddress">...
Robert, I believe it would have to be a restriction, not an extension, since you're changing the behaviour of zip, and even then, I don't think you're allowed...
Hi Wes, I see. But don't you find it strange that the O in SOAP refers to Objects while XML schemas don't seem to be able to preserve basic OO semantics? A...
Well, as far as Java goes, if you have two classes, Address and USAddress, Like this: public class Address { String city; String zip; String country; } public...
Hello, How do C# or Java come into the picture? I though you were discussing the limitations of XML Schema... not C# RC...
Bob Cunnings
cunnings@...
Apr 3, 2002 7:28 pm
7380
At the last interop meeting [1] we talked about having the next meeting in about three months in the bay area. I can arrange to host this at the IBM Almaden...
Hi, ... Sorry, I am primarely looking for OO representations in SOAP and I think there are some problems that need to be addressed at the protocol level. Again...
... while XML schemas don't seem to be able to preserve basic OO semantics? From what I understand, in SOAP 1.2 the S, O, A, and P don't stand for anything. ...
Yann Christensen
yannc@...
Apr 3, 2002 9:24 pm
7383
The SOAP RPC encoding can send data (e.g., aliased pointers via href/id) that cannot be expressed in XML Schema. There is no requirement that WSDL use XML...
No, for the same reason. The effective type definition for address is; <complexType name="address"> <sequence> <element name="city" type="xsd:string"/> ...
... I agree. The programming languages are what they are. C#, Java, C++ and others have the constructs to build Classes, Inheritance, Polymorphism, etc.These...
Sam, thanks for driving this. The timing looks good, as does the location. I've looked through the tests, and i don't see how this moves us forward, I couldn't...